Whereas efforts that prohibit employment discrimination based on factors such as race or sexual orientation require certain organizational changes, creating a transgender-inclusive workplace requires organizational changes that include personnel, policy, legal, and medical issues unique to transgender people. At present, it is not clear whether communities are actually implementing these organizational changes, even after adopting transgender-inclusive nondiscrimination laws. This research project surveyed 74 municipalities with transgender-inclusive nondiscrimination employments laws, in order to assess and better understand the state of transgender-inclusive public workplaces. The initial results of the survey suggest that although innovation continues to increase, implementation and enforcement remain low, affecting managers' and employees' abilities to operate in a transgender-inclusive environment. Recommendations are made to improve implementation and enforcement of transgender-inclusive nondiscrimination laws.
Alm, A. ( 1992). A need for new approaches: Command and control is no longer a cure-all. EPA Journal, 18, 6—11.
2.
Badgett, M.V.L. (1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination . Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(4), 726—739.
3.
Barnes v. City of Cincinnati, 401 F.3d 709 (2005).
4.
Button, J.W., Rienzo, B.A., & Wald, K.D. (1997). Private lives, public conflicts: Battles over gay rights in American communities. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
5.
Cohen, R., O'Byrne, S., & Maxwell, P. (1999). Employment discrimination based on sexual orientation: The American, Canadian and U.K. responses. Law & Inequity , 17(1), 1—20.
6.
Colvin, R. (2000). Improving state policies prohibiting public employment discrimination based on sexual orientation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(2), 5—19.
7.
Croteau, J.M., & Lark, J.S. (1995). On being lesbian, gay, or bisexual in student affairs: A national survey of experiences on the job. NASPA Journal, 32(1), 223—239.
8.
Currah, P., & Minter, S. (2001). Transgender equality: A handbook for activists and policymakers. Washington, DC: National Center for Lesbian Rights, and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.
9.
Currah, P., & Minter, S.P. (2006). Gender pluralisms under the transgender umbrella . In P. Currah, R. M. Juang, & S. P. Minter (Eds.), Transgender Rights. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
D'Emilio, J. (1983). Sexual politics, sexual communities (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Gordon, R. (2001, February 16). S.F. set to add sex change benefits, city would be first to include option. Retrieved October 5, 2006, from http://www.SFGate.com.
12.
Harmon, V. (2006, July 1). San Francisco city and county transgender health benefits. San Francisco: Human Rights Commission.
13.
International City/County Management Association (ICMA). (1998a). City managers or strong mayors: The choice is clear. Washington, DC: Author.
14.
International City/County Management Association (ICMA). (1998b). Di ferent forms of local government. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
Irwin, J. (2002). Discrimination against gay men, lesbians, and transgender people working in education. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 14(2), 65—77.
16.
Jost, K. (2006). Transgender issues: Should gender-identity discrimination be illegal. CQ Researcher, 16(17), 385—408.
17.
Klawitter, M., & Flatt, V. (1998). The effects of state and local antidiscrimination policies for sexual orientation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(4), 658—686.
18.
Letellier, P. (2003). Beyond he and she. Retrieved November 12, 2004, from http://patrickletellier.com/articles.html .
19.
Levine, M.P. (1989). The status of gay men in the workplace. In M. S. Kimmel & M. A. Messner (Eds.), Men's lives (pp. 261—276). New York: Macmillan.
20.
Lombardi, E., Wilchins, R., Priesing, D., & Malouf, D. (2001). Gender violence: Transgender experiences with violence and discrimination. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(1), 89—101.
21.
Minter, S., & Daley, C. (2003). Trans realities: A legal needs assessment of San Francisco's transgender communities. San Francisco: National Center for Lesbian Rights and Transgender Law Center.
22.
Oswald, R., Gebbie, E., & Culton, L. (2000). Report to the community: Rainbow Illinois survey of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people in central Illinois. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Human and Community Development.
23.
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).
24.
Riccucci, N.M., & Gossett, C.W. (1996). Employment discrimination in state and local government: The lesbian and gay male experience. American Review of Public Administration, 26(2), 175—200.
25.
Sausa, L. (2002). Updating college and university campus policies: Meeting the needs of trans students, staff, and faculty. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(3/4), 43—55.
26.
Shaffer, M.A., Joplin, J.R.W., Bell, M.P., Lau T., & Oguz, C. (2000). Gender discrimination and job-related outcomes: A cross-cultural comparison of working women in the United States and China . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 395—427.
27.
Sheehy, C. (2004). Transgender issues in the workplace: A tool for managers. Washington, DC: Human Rights Campaign Foundation.
28.
Simon, H.A., & Daly, E. (1992). Sexual orientation and workplace rights: A potential land mine for employers?Employee Relations Law Journal, 18(1), 29—60.
29.
Steelman, T., & Ascher, W. (1997). Public involvement methods in natural resource policy making: Advantages, disadvantages and trade-offs. Policy Sciences, 30, 1—90.
Taylor, V., & Raeburn, N.C. (1995). Identity politics as high-risk activism: Career consequences for lesbians, gay, and bisexual sociologists. Social Problems, 42, 252—273.
32.
The Task Force. (2006, March 3). Jurisdictions with explicitly transgender-inclusive anti-discrimination laws (with population data). Retrieved March 28, 2006, from http://www.thetaskforce.org.
33.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). (1997 ). Sexual orientation-based employment discrimination: States' experience with statutory prohibitions (Document Number B-277688). Washington, DC: Author.
34.
Walker, J. (1969, September). The diffusion of innovation among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880—899.
