By juxtaposing the experiences of conducting research at two schools, one a Charismatic, evangelical, fundamentalist Christian school, the other, an ultra-orthodox Hasidic Jewish girls’ school, the author discusses prevailing notions of subjectivity, arguing that postmodern and postpositivistic models of subjectivity apply, but that their applications are best imagined as profoundly context driven.
Antoun, R. (2001). Understanding fundamentalism: Christian, Islamic, and Jewish movements. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
Ashby, R., & Lee, P. J. (1987) Discussing the evidence. Teaching History, 48, 13-17.
3.
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (1996). “Back when God was around and everything”: Elementary children’s understanding of historical time. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 419-454.
4.
Bloom, L. R., & Munro, P. (1995). Conflicts of selves: Non-unitary subjectivity in women administrators’ life history narratives. In A. Hatch & R. Wisniewski (Eds.), Life history and narrative (pp. 99-112). London: Falmer.
5.
Bronner, L. L. (1993, Fall). From veil to wig: Jewish women’s hair covering. Judaism, 42, 465-477.
6.
Brophy, J. (1990). Teaching social studies for understanding and higher-order applications. Elementary School Journal, 90, 351-417.
7.
Broyde, M. J., Krakowski, L., & Shapiro, M. (1991). Further on women’s hair covering: An exchange. Judaism, 40, 79-94.
8.
Cooperman, A. (2004, September 16). Openly religious, to a point: Bush leaves the specifics of his faith to speculation. Washington Post, p. A01-A01.
9.
Davies, B. (1992). Women’s subjectivity and feminist stories. In C. Ellis & M. G. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 53-76). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Ellsworth, E. (1997). Teaching positions: Difference, pedagogy, and the power of address. New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Epstein, T. (1998). Deconstructing differences in African-American and European-American adolescents’ perspectives on U.S. history. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(4), 397-423.
12.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 645-672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
14.
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, fiction and forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
16.
Grant, S. G. (2001). It’s just the facts, or is it? The relationship between teachers’ practices and students’ understandings of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 99(1), 65-108.
17.
Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller, M. Sosna, & D. E. Wellberry (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought (pp. 222-236). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
Heilman, S. (1992). Defenders of the faith. New York: Schocken.
19.
Heshusius, L. (1994). Freeing ourselves from objectivity: Managing subjectivity or turning toward a participatory mode of consciousness?Educational Researcher, 23(3), 15-22.
20.
Hollway, W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Jacobs, M., Munro, P., & Adams, N. (1995). Palimpsest: (Re)reading women’s lives. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 327-345.
22.
Kondo, D. K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Lagemann, E. C. (2002). Useable knowledge in education: A memorandum for the Spencer Board of Directors. Chicago: Spencer Foundation.
24.
Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (1996). “They still use some of their past”: Historical salience in elementary children’s chronological thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(5), 531-576.
25.
Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2001). Doing history. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
27.
Mosborg, S. (2002). Speaking of history: How adolescents use their knowledge of history in reading the daily news. Cognition and Instruction, 20(3), 323-358.
28.
Myerhoff, B. (1978). Number our days. New York: Dutton.
29.
Peshkin, A. (1986). God’s choice: The total world of a fundamentalist Christian school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity: One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17-21.
31.
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Roman, L. G. (1993). Double exposure: the politics of feminist materialist ethnography. Educational Theory, 43, 279-308.
33.
Schweber, S. (2006a). “Breaking down barriers” or “building strong Christians”: Reflexive affirmation and the abnegation of history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(1), 9-33.
34.
Schweber, S. (2006b). Fundamentally 9/11: The mechanics of collective memory in a fundamentalist Christian school. American Journal of Education, 112(3), 392-417.
35.
Schweber, S., & Irwin, R. (2003). “Especially special”: Learning about Jews in a fundamentalist Christian school. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1693-1719.
36.
Seixas, P. (1993) Historical understanding among adolescents in a multicultural setting. Curriculum Inquiry, 23, 301-327.
37.
Shapiro, M. (1990). Another example of “Minhag America.”Judaism, 39, 148-154.
38.
Van Sledright, B. A. (1995). The teaching-learning interaction in American history: A study of two teachers and their fifth graders. Journal of Social Studies Research, 19, 3-23.
39.
Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.
40.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and postcultural theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
41.
Wellen Levine, S. (2003). Mystics, mavericks and merrymakers: An intimate journey among Hasidic girls. New York: New York University Press.
42.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
