It is an issue of some contestation as to whether generalization is an appropriate requisite to demand of case study research in any case. The author argues that the critique is misdirected, and based on Bent Flyvbjerg’s concept of a “critical case,” ways of generalizing from case studies are indicated (Iran/Iraq War of 1980). In addition, the author illustrates that the case study is idyllic for generalizing using the brand of test that Karl Popper called “falsification.” Conversely, the author exhibits Robert Stake’s ethos that case studies need not make any claims about the generalizability of their findings but rather, what is crucial is the use others make of them—chiefly, that they feed into processes of “naturalistic generalization.”
Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics; or how economists explain (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Bromley, D. (1986). The case study method in psychology and related disciplines. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1985). Toward a scientific understanding of international conflict: A personal view. International Studies Quarterly, 29, 121-136.
4.
Campbell, D. T. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
Campbell, S. (2003). Case studies in planning comparative advantages and the problem of generalization (University of Michigan Working Paper). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
6.
Caporaso, J. A., Marks, G., Moravcsik, A., & Pollack, M. A. (1997). Does the European Union represent an n of 1?European Union Studies Association, X(3), 1-5. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from http://www.eustudies.org/N1debate.htm
7.
Cronbach, L. (1983). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Donmoyer, R. (2000). Generalizability and the single-case study. In R. Gomm (Ed.), Case study method (pp. 45-68). London: Sage.
9.
Eckstein, H. (2000). The case study and theory in political science. In R. Gomm (Ed.), Case study method (pp.119-164). London: Sage.
10.
Flyvbjerg, B. (1993). Aristotle, Foucault and progressive phronesis. In E. Winkler & J. Coombs (Eds.), Applied ethics (pp. 11-27). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
11.
Flyvbjerg, B. (1997). The Aalborg Study: Case selection and data collection (Research Report). Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University, Department of Development and Planning.
12.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (S. Sampson, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Galliers, R. D. (1992). Information systems research—Issues, methods and practical guidelines. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.
14.
Geller, D., & Singer, D. (2000). Nations at war: A scientific study of international conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Gomm, R. (Ed.). (2000a). Case study method. London: Sage.
16.
Gomm, R. (2000b). Case study and generalization. In R. Gomm (Ed.), Case study method (pp. 98-116). London: Sage.
17.
Gomm, R. (2000c). Case study and theory. In R. Gomm (Ed.), Case study method (pp. 234-258). London: Sage.
18.
Gottlieb v. Gottlieb, 19 A.D.2d 860 245 N.Y.S.2d 348 (1963).
19.
Grummon, S. (1982). The Iran-Iraq War: Islam embattled (Washington Paper No. 92). New York: Praeger.
20.
Hamilton, D. (1981). Generalization in the educational sciences: Problems and purposes. In T. Popkewitz & R. Tabachnick (Eds.), The study of schooling: Field based methodologies in educational research and evaluation. New York: Praeger.
21.
Hempel, C. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. (1997). Single case experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
23.
Holland, K., & Herstad, J. (2000). The “critical case” in information systems research (Working Paper). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo, Department of Informatics.
24.
Internet Classics Archive. (n.d.). Meno by Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.). Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/meno.htm
25.
Johansson, R. (2002). Case study methodology reflected in architectural research. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from http://www.infra.kth.se/%7Erolfj/Foufaces2003.pdf
26.
Kennedy, M. (1979). Generalizing from single case studies. Evaluation Quarterly: A Journal of Applied Social Research, 3, 661-679.
27.
Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 65, 682-693.
28.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (2000). The only generalization is: There is no generalization. In R. Gomm (Ed.), Case study method (pp. 27-44). London: Sage.
30.
Mitchell, J. (2000). Case and situation analysis. In R. Gomm (Ed.), Case study method (pp. 165-186). London: Sage.
31.
Mitchell, J. C. (1983). Case and situation analysis. The Sociological Review, 31, 187-211.
32.
Peceny, M. (1999). Democracy at the point of bayonets. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
33.
Popper, K. (2000). The logic of scientific discovery (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
34.
Robertson, J. E., & Norris, N. F. J. (2001). Generalization: The linchpin of evidence-based practice?Educational Action Research, 9, 303-310.
35.
Said, E. (2003). Orientalism. London: Penguin.
36.
Schofield, J. (2000). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In R. Gomm (Ed.), Case study method (pp. 69-97). London: Sage.
37.
Stake, R. (1982). Naturalistic generalization. Review Journal of Philosophy and Social Science, 7, 1-12.
38.
Stake, R. (1983, February). Case study method: Deacon University. Educational Researcher, 7, 89-113.
39.
Stalley, R. (1998). Aristotle, the Politics. London: Penguin Classics.
40.
Taylor, C., & Jodice, D. (1983). World handbook of political and social indicators (Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
Tripp, D. (1985). Case study generalization: An agenda for action. British Educational Research Journal, 11, 35-38.
42.
Walton, J. (1992). Making the theoretical case. In H. S. Becker & C. Ragin (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 121-137). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Yin, R. (1994a). Analyzing case study evidence. In Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed., pp. 105-125). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Yin, R. (1994b). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Yin, R. (1994c). Conducting case studies: Collecting the evidence. In Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed., pp. 84-95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
