The purpose of this narrative is to explore students’ perceptions of exemplary and effective teachers, contextualized within contemporary conversations about “evidence-based” instruction and school reform. A brief overview of audience performance texts and their implications for teacher education programs is first provided, followed by the role-play of a panel discussion among students, educators, and policy makers. The text highlights the relationship between students’ perceptions and the research regarding optimal teaching strategies and learning environments.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Longman.
2.
Bracey, G. W. (2004). Setting the record straight: Responses to misconceptions about public education in the U.S. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3.
Cambourne, B. (2000a). Is an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning possible? 25 years of inquiry suggest it is. In N. K. Padak, T. V. Rashinski, J. K. Peck, B. W. Church, G. Fawcett, J. M. Hendershot, et al. (Eds.), Distinguished educators on reading: Contributions that have shaped effective literacy instruction (pp. 59-65). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4.
Cambourne, B. (2000b). Towards an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning: Twenty years of inquiry. In N. K. Padak, T. V. Rashinski, J. K. Peck, B. W. Church, G. Fawcett, J. M. Hendershot, et al. (Eds.), Distinguished educators on reading: Contributions that have shaped effective literacy instruction (pp. 49-58). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5.
Cambourne, B. (2001). Turning learning theory into classroom instruction: A minicase study. Reading Teacher, 54(4), 414-417.
6.
Comber, B. (2001). Negotiating critical literacies. School Talk, 6(3), 1-2.
7.
Conquergood, D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58, 179-194.
8.
Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. (Original work published 1970.)
10.
Graves, D. H. (2002). Testing is not teaching: What should count in education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11.
Institute for Education Sciences. (2004). Predoctoral interdisciplinary research training program in the educational sciences (CFDA No. 84, 305C). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
12.
Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13.
Kohn, A. (2004a, April 15). Feel-Bad education. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=03kohn.h24
14.
Kohn, A. (2004b). NCLB and the attempt to privatize education. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. 79-97). Boston: Beacon.
15.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Lincoln, Y., & Denzin N. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1047-1065). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Lyon, R. (2004, May). [Featured speaker presentation]. Presented at the International Reading Association Conference, Reno, Nevada.
18.
Matthewson, G. C. (1994). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 1131-1161). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
19.
McCabe P. (2003). Enhancing self-efficacy for high-stakes reading tests. Reading Teacher, 57(1), 12-20.
20.
National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
National Research Council. (2004). Advancing scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22.
National Science Foundation. (2004). Graduate research fellowship program (NSF 04-615). Available from http://www.nsf.gov
23.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
24.
Ohanian, S. (n.d.). NCLB in your face: Threat and implicit danger in the words they use. Available from http://www.susanohanian.org/
25.
Richardson, L. (2002). Poetic representation of interviews. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 877-891). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Richardson, V. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
27.
Senge, P. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday.
28.
Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
29.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Yatvin, J., Weaver, C., & Garan E. (2003). Reading First: Cautions and recommendations. Language Arts, 81, 28-33.
