Interpreting India,Identity,and Media From the Field: Exploring the Communicative Nature of the Exotic Other

Abstract

This study explores the process of interpreting interviews and media collected during two visits to India. Looking at the communicative nature of Indian identity, the author takes into account his own identity as an American exposed to a lifetime of exotic representations of Indian culture. Recognizing the limits of time for study in the field, recorded media provide valuable evidence and open discursive avenues to greater understandings of our world. As a discursive space, the camera’s gaze focuses attention back to the ontological conditions of the researchers’ experiences as a forum for the negotiation of values and beliefs. Evidence of the process of communication provides a better understanding of the construction of meaning and identity. Thus, the mediated data, reconsidered later, recall the eidetic essence of existential knowledge supporting the process of ethnographic writing.

Keywords

semiotics India identity exotic Other representation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, K. , & Jack, D. C. (1991). Learning to listen: Interview techniques and practices. In S. Berger Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 11-26). New York: Routledge.

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). New York: Noonday Press.

Crewe, Q. (1998). Letters from India. Ebington, UK: Long Barn Books.

Ellis, C. (1997). Evocative autoethnography: Writing emotionally about our lives. In W. G. Tierney & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (pp. 115-139). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Fiske, J. (1987). British cultural studies and television. In R. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse: Television and contemporary criticism (pp. 254-288). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Ford-Ahmed, T. (1999). Corporeal explosions: The lived experiences of African-American graduate women during an explosive week. In T. McDonald & T. Ford-Ahmed (Eds.), Nature of a sistuh: Black women’s lived experiences in contemporary culture (pp. 71-87). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

Gitlin, T. (1999). Postmodernism defined at last. In K. B. Massey (Ed.), Readings in mass communication: Media literacy and culture (pp. 209-216). Mountainview, CA: Mayfield.

Lanigan, R. L. (1992). The human science of communicology: A phenomenology of discourse in Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Eye and mind ( J. Edie , Ed., & C. Dallery, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

10.

Murphy, P. D. (1999). Doing audience ethnography: A narrative account of establishing ethnographic identity and locating interpretive communities in field work. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 479-504.

11.

Nelson, J. (1989). Phenomenology as a feminist methodology: Explicating interview. In K. Carter & C. Spitzak (Eds.), Doing research on women’s perspective on communication theory and method (pp. 221-241). New Jersey: Ablex.

12.

Nichols, B. (1991). Representing reality: Issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

13.

Nöth, W. (2001). Towards a semiotics of the cultural other. American Journal of Semiotics, 17(2), 239-251.

14.

Paz, O. (1995). In light of India (E. Weinberger, Trans.). London: Harcourt Brace.

15.

Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings volume 2 (1893-1913) ( The Peirce Edition Project , Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

16.

Sebeok, T. A. (2000). Cultural signs: Essays in semiotics-II. New York: Legas.

17.

Singh, J. G. (1996). Colonial narratives, cultural dialogues: “Discoveries” of India in the language of colonialism. London: Routledge.

18.

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived-experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario, Canada: State University of New York Press.