This article methodologically considers how to conduct online inquiry about the production of deprivatized selves. It begins by discussing how online selves can be understood as public selves produced under the auspices of particular local cultures on the Internet. Embedded within this argument is the authors’ assertion that methods for inquiring about the production of public selves offline (fieldwork and active interviewing) are amenable to online environments. The focus of the article is a discussion of how the authors tried to adopt such strategies of inquiry to an online arena. A methodological conundrum shared by the two studies discussed—the struggle between doing active inquiry about the dynamics of self-construction and maintaining the “safe space” expected in particular types of online arenas of self-construction—is highlighted. The article concludes by suggesting that future inquiry of online public selves will likely face similar challenges.
Bech, H., & Reynolds, R. (1999). Commentaries on Seidman, Meeks, and Traschen: “Beyond the closet?”Sexualities, 2 (3), 343-346.
2.
Broad, K. L. (2002). Social movement selves. Sociological Perspectives, 45 (3), 317-336.
3.
Burrows, R., Nettleton, S., Pleace, N., Loader, B., & Muncer, S. (2000). Virtual community care? Social policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support. Information, Communication and Society, 3 (1), 95-121.
4.
Chase, S. E. (2001). Universities as discursive environments for sexual identity construction. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Institutional selves: Troubled identities in a postmodern world (pp. 142-156). New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Children of Lesbians and Gays Everywhere. (2002). About COLAGE. Retrieved from http://www.colage.org/about.html
6.
Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4 (4), 615-633.
7.
Dawson, L. L., & Hennebry, J. (1999). New religions and the Internet: Recruiting in a new public space. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 14 (1), 17-39.
8.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (1998). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DeVault, M. L. (1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
10.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, R. W., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307-336.
11.
Donnath, J. S. (1997). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. Smith & P. Kollack (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29-59). London: Routledge.
12.
Ellis, A., Highleyman, L., Schaub, K., & White, M. (Eds.) (2002). The Harvey Milk Institute guide to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Internet research. New York: Harrington Park.
13.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1999). At the border of narrative and ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28 (5), 561-573.
15.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2000). The self in a world of going concerns. Symbolic Interaction, 23 (2), 95-115.
16.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.). (2001). Institutional selves: Troubled identities in a postmodern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2000). The self we live by: Narrative identity in a postmodern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Hughes, E. C. (1984). Going concerns: The study of American institutions. In The sociological eye, selected papers. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
20.
Joos, K. (2002, August). The invisibility of children of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender and queer parent (s): A challenging work in progress. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, Chicago, IL.
21.
Klein, H. K. (1999). Tocqueville in cyberspace: Using the Internet for citizen associations. The Information Society, 15 (4), 213-220.
22.
Loseke, D. R. (2001). Lived realities and formula stories of “battered women.” In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Institutional selves: Troubled identities in a postmodern world (pp. 107-126). New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Martinez-Torres, M. E. (2001). Civil society, the Internet, and the Zapatistas. Peace Review, 13 (3), 347-355.
24.
McKenna, K., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity “demarginalization” through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (3), 681-694.
25.
Muncer, S., Burrows, R., Pleace, N., Loader, B., & Nettleton, S. (2000). Births, deaths, sex and marriage... but very few presents? A case study of social support in cyberspace. Critical Public Health, 10 (1), 1-18.
26.
Northcott, A. (1999). Internet, community, and the technological way of being. Cultural Studies: A Research Volume, 4, 99-130.
27.
O’Brien, J. (1999). Writing in the body: Gender (re)production in online communication. In P. Kollack & M. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 77-104). London: Routledge.
28.
Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays. (2004). PFLAG’s vision and mission. Retrieved from http://www.pflag.org/about/mission.html
29.
Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2000). The digital divide: Who is not online. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=21
30.
Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2: An invitation to a critical humanism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
32.
Russell, A. (2001). The Zapatistas and computer-mediated peace. Peace Review, 13 (3), 357-363.
33.
Sassi, S. (2001). The transformation of the public space? In B. Axford & R. Huggins (Eds.), New media and politics (pp. 89-108). London: Sage.
34.
Sheilds, R. (1996). Cultures of Internet: Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies. London: Sage.
35.
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto.
36.
Song, F. W. (2002). Communities of intimate strangers. Unpublished manuscript.
37.
Stacey, J., & Biblarz, T. J. (2001). (How) does the sexual orientation of parents matter?American Sociological Review, 66 (2), 159-183.
38.
Stone, A. R. (1991). Will the real body please stand up? Boundary stories about virtual cultures. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (pp. 81-118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
40.
Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 51 (2), 231-251.
41.
Whittle, S. (2001). The trans-cyberian mail way. In R. Holliday & J. Hassard (Eds.), Contested bodies (pp. 153-167). London: Routledge.
