Bobos on the Road,or Would Sal Paradise Have Super Sized?

Abstract

This article studies the co-optation of bohemian life into the bourgeois realm—positioning contemporary cultural critics Peter Brooks and Thomas Frank within a critical discussion of the Beats and the social theories of the Frankfurt School. Personal concerns are connected with larger social issues, situating them within lived, autoethnographic experiences to facilitate sociological analysis. Although Adorno and Habermas avoid discussion of direct experience, Brooks avoids theoretical analysis; although the Beats idealize, Frank is overly pessimistic. By creating an equal place between historical discussion, personal reflection, theoretical analysis, and quotations from social theorists, this article offers a critical position between these modes of thought as well as raising questions of social change, identity, and class by taking McLaren’s postmodern flâneur and setting him on the road.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno, T. W. (1974). Minima moralia. London: NLB.

Arendt, H. (1968). Introduction. In W. Benjamin (Ed.), Illuminations: Essays and reflections (pp. 1-55). New York: Schocken.

Bell, D. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.

Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations: Essays and reflections. New York: Schocken.

Benjamin, W. (1978). Reflections: Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings. New York: Schocken.

Benjamin, W. (1999). The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

Borchard, K. (2003). From flânerie to pseudo-flânerie: The postmodern tourist in Las Vegas. Studies in Symbolic Interactionism, 26, 191-213.

Brooks, D. (2000). Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Chambers, I. (1994). Migrancy, culture, identity. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

10.

Clifford, J. (1997). Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11.

Demetz, P. (1978). Introduction. In W. Benjamin (Ed.), Reflections: Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings (pp. vii-xliii). New York: Schocken.

12.

Frank, T. (1997a). Why Johnny can’t dissent. In T. Frank & M. Weiland (Eds.), Commodify your dissent: Salvos from the Baffler (pp. 31-45). New York: Norton.

13.

Frank, T. (1997b). The conquest of cool: Business culture, counterculture and the rise of hip consumerism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

14.

Frank, T. (1997c). Alternative to what? In T. Frank & M. Weiland (Eds.), Commodify your dissent: Salvos from the Baffler (pp. 145-161). New York: Norton.

15.

Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

Harrington, M. (1972, August). We few, we happy few, we bohemians. Esquire, pp. 99-104, 162-164.

17.

Mailer, N. (1957). The White Negro. San Francisco: City Lights Books.

18.

Marcuse, H. (1964). The one-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon.

19.

Marx, K. (1978). The German ideology. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader (pp. 146-200). New York: Norton.

20.

McLaren, P. (1997). The ethnographer as postmodern flâneur: Critical reflexivity and posthybridity. In P. McLaren, Revolutionary multiculturalism: Pedagogies of dissent for the new millennium (pp. 76-113). Boulder, CO: Westview.

21.

McNally, D. (1979). Desolate angel. New York: Delta.

22.

Schattuck, K. (2001, March 22). Kerouac’s “Road” scroll is going to auction. New York Times, p. E1.

23.

Schwartz, D. (1970). Selected essays of Delmore Schwartz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

24.

Tiedemann, R. (1999). Dialectics at a standstill. In W. Benjamin (Ed.), The Arcades Project (pp. 929-945). Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

25.

Whyte, W. H. (1956). The organization man. New York: Simon & Schuster.