Abstract
This article demonstrates that research findings may arise out of difference, difficulty, methodological clumsiness, and the kind of rich disequilibrium that masks itself as failure. The article tells the story of a problematic case study of Clayboy, a teenage cocaine dealer who fails to narrate as the author expects him to. Pushed to interpretive selfreflection by his many failures, the author learns to put aside received knowledge of narrative, delinquency, and violence and to attend instead to the internal logic of Clayboy's narrative practices. The article's concluding reflections reframe research as a kind of learning, thereby affirming the value of tenacity, the feasibility of crossing paradigms, and the possibility of finding insight in error.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
