In the social sciences, we usually think of criteria as culture-free standards that stand apart from human subjectivity and value. The author argues in this article, however, that conflicts over which criteria to apply usually boil down to differences in values that are contingent on humanchoices.Thedemandforcriteriareflectsthedesiretocontainfreedom, limit possibilities, and resist change. Ultimately, all standards of evaluation rest on a research community’s agreement to comply with their own humanly developed conventions. The author ends by considering the personal standards that he applies to works that fall under the new rubric of poetic social science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brady, I. (1991). Anthropological poetics. Savage, MD: Rowman &! Littlefield.
2.
Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
Couser, G. T. (1997). Recovering bodies: Illness, disability, and life writing. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4.
Freeman, M. (1993). Rewriting the self: History, memory, narrative. London: Routledge.
5.
Freeman, M. (1998). Experience, narrative and the relation between them. Narrative Inquiry, 8, 455-466.
6.
Geertz, C. (1980). Blurred genres: The refiguration of social thought. The American Scholar, 49, 165-182.
7.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Lopate, P. (Ed.). (1994). The art of the personal essay: An anthology from the classical era to the present. New York: Anchor.
9.
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism (essays 1972-1980). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
Stone, L. (Ed.) (1997). Close to the bone: Memoirs of hurt, rage and desire. New York: Grove.
