Do You See What I See? Examining a Collaborative Ethnography

Abstract

Although there are increasing examples of collaborative ethnography, there are few explicit reflections on its process. The authors systematically juxtapose their jointly collected but separately recorded observations in a neighborhood recreation center in Chicago to examine points of similarity and difference. They find that collaborative ethnography can be useful for providing a richer description, highlighting perceptual inconsistencies, and recognizing the influence of ethnographers’ personal and intellectual backgrounds on the collection and recording of data. The authors’ reflexive analysis also illustrates that the choice of collaborators is key for influencing the depth or breadth of the data collected. Finally, they show that there is neither one truth, nor one reality, nor one stable social world to observe.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler, P. , & Adler, P. (1990). Backboards and blackboards: College athletics and role engulfment. New York: Columbia University Press.

Adler, P. , & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Altheide, D. L. , & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Baudrillard, J. (1988). Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings ( M. Poster , Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Belgrave, L. , & Smith, K. (1995). Negotiated validity in collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 69-86.

Brewer, R. (1986). Research for whom and by whom: A reconsideration of the Black social scientist as insider. Wisconsin Sociologist, 23(1), 19-28.

Burawoy, M. , Burton, A. , Ferguson, A. A. , Fox, K. J. , Gamson, J. , Gartrell, N. , Hurst, L. , Kurzman, C. , Salzinger, L. , Schiffman, J. , & Ui, S. (1991). Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Clifford, J. , & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

10.

Denzin, N. K. (1986). A postmodern social theory. Sociological Theory, 4, 194-204.

11.

Fine, M. , & Weis, L. (1996). Writing the “wrongs” of fieldwork. Qualitative Inquiry, 2, 251-274.

12.

Liebow, E. (1967). Tally’s corner. Boston: Little, Brown.

13.

Lofland, J. , & Lofland, L. (1984). Analyzing social settings (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

14.

Lyotard, J. F. (1979). The postmodern condition (G. Bennington & G. Masumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

15.

Newman, K. S. (1999). No shame in my game: The working poor in the inner city. New York: Knopf.

16.

Pattillo-McCoy, M. (1998). Sweet mothers and gangbangers: Managing crime in a Black middle-class neighborhood. Social Forces, 76, 747-774.

17.

Pattillo-McCoy, M. (1999). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the Black middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Sanjek, R. (1988). On ethnographic validity. In R. Sanjek (Ed.), Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology (pp. 385-413). New York: Cornell University Press.

19.

Sullivan, M. L. (1989). Getting paid: Youth crime and work in the inner city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

20.

Theophano, J. , & Curtis, K. (1996). Reflections on a tale told twice. In A. Lareau & J. Shultz (Eds.), Journeys through ethnography: Realistic accounts of fieldwork (pp. 151-176). Boulder, CO: Westview.

21.

Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.