Abstract
This study examines libel litigation in the late nineteenth century and compares it to the libel climate in the late twentieth century. Libel reports in trade journals from 1884 to 1899 were surveyed and catalogued. The strongest similarity found is the frequent use of libel law by public figures and public officials. In both periods public persons sued over articles concerning public performance even though the likelihood of winning large damage awards was minimal. This finding suggests that minor changes in modern libel doctrine will not resolve current conflicts in libel law.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
