Further findings in an analysis of reactions to the President's “Twin Cities” speech challenge the notion that audiences will be more likely to accept an objective news story than the opinion-loaded sentences of an editorial. The authors are all members of the faculty at the University of Minnesota.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CochranW.G.“Some Consequences When the Assumptions for the Analysis of Variance Are Not Satisfied,”Biometrics (1947), 3: 22-38.
2.
EisenhartC.“The Assumptions Underlying the Analysis of Variance,”Biometrics (1947), 3: 1-21.
3.
HovlandCarl I., LumsdaineArthur R., and SheffieldFred D., Experiments on Mass Communication, Vol. III, Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1949.
4.
McNemarQuinn, Psychological Statistics.New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1949.
5.
SwansonC.E.JenkinsJ., and JonesR.L.“President Truman Speaks: A Study of Ideas vs. Media,”Journalism Quarterly, 27:3 (Summer 1950), 251–62.
