In 1979, National Public Radio (NPR) established its Department of Specialized Audience Programs, a dedicated unit responsible for the acquisition, development, and production of minority programming. For over a decade, the Department of Specialized Audience Programs operated as a semi-autonomous unit until it was absorbed into NPR’s general news division and later dissolved. Previous scholarship has suggested that NPR has been subject to economic and political pressures, which have limited its ability to fulfill its diversity mission; however, I found that NPR has been resistant to efforts to diversify its programming, despite receiving outside pressure from legislators, funders, and advocacy organizations.
Advisory Panel on Essentials for Effective Minority Programming. (1974, May). Essentials for effective minority programming (in public broadcasting). Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
2.
Advisory Panel on Minorities and Public Broadcasting. (1973, October). Minorities and public television: An appraisal. The Ford Foundation’s Office of Public Broadcasting. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
3.
Association of Independents in Radio. (1991, June5). Letter to Douglas Bennet. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
4.
Audience Building Task Force. (1986, July). Report of the audience building task force. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
5.
BennetD. (1988a, August10). Specialized audience programming. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
6.
BennetD. (1988b, May10). Letter to Edward R. Roybal. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
7.
BennetD. (1991, March18). The future of DSAP. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
8.
BlantonP. (1975, November16). Meeting with SIP sub-committee. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
9.
Board Committee on Policy and Program Planning. (1974, November17). Special interest programs at National Public Radio. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
10.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. The New Press.
11.
BourdieuP. (1999). On television. Cambridge University Press.
DavisB. (1991, March8). New proposal to eliminate DSAP. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
18.
Department of Audience Research and Program Evaluation. (1983, December). The state of public radio programming in FY 1984: What it is now and how it got that way. National Public Radio. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
19.
EngelmanR. (1996). Public radio and television in America: A political history. SAGE.
FrischknechtL. (1974a, April19). Statement of Lee C. Frischknecht, President, National Public Radio in response to testimony of representatives of the National Black Media Coalition and the National Organization of Women. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
24.
FrischknechtL. (1974b, November8). Piloting and program development priorities. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
25.
FrischknechtL. (1975). NPR budget proposal to CPB for fiscal 1986. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
26.
GarbesL. (2022). When the blank slate is a white one: White institutional isomorphism in the birth of National Public Radio. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 8(1), 79–94.
LimmerickD. (1991, March8). Board programming meeting. National Public Radio. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
33.
LoosenW.ReimerJ.OberhülsmannL.OlphenT. (2025). From cultivating fans to coping with troublemakers: A typology of journalists’ audience relationships. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990251343074
34.
LoviglioJ. (2013). Public radio in crisis. In LoviglioJ.HilmesM. (Eds.), Radio’s new wave: Global sound in the digital era (pp. 24–42). Taylor & Francis.
35.
McCauleyM. (2005). NPR: The trials and triumphs of National Public Radio. University Press.
36.
McCourtT. (1999). Conflicting communication interests in America: The case of National Public Radio. Praeger.
National Public Radio (NPR). (1975). Content criteria for producing, evaluating, and coding of special interest programs. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
42.
National Public Radio (NPR). (1979, May24). NPR board resolution: Minority Task Report, adopted May 24, 1979. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
43.
PowellA. (1989, February17). Host position. National Public Radio. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
44.
Research & Evaluation. (1986). Some programming trends at NPR member stations, 1979–1985. National Public Radio. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
45.
SchudsonM. (2005). Autonomy from what? In BensonR.NeveuE. (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 214–223). Polity.
46.
SilvermanA. (n.d.). Memo to Doug Bennet on name change. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
47.
SmithJ. (1988, April6). Perception of DSAP. National Public Radio. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
48.
Special Interest Programs Subcommittee. (1975, October10). Minutes of special interest sub-committee conference call—October 10, 1975. National Public Radio. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
49.
ThomasR. J.HindmanE. B. (2015). Confusing roles, uncertain responsibilities: Journalistic discourse on Juan Williams, NPR, and Fox News. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(2), 468–486.
50.
WarnockT. (1979, May11). Draft response to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting minority task force report. Archives of National Public Radio, University of Maryland.
