This study examines the perceived relevance and implementation of competing normative ideals in journalism in times of increasing use of digital technology in newsrooms. Based on survey and content analysis data from 37 countries, we found a small positive relationship between the use of digital research tools and “watchdog” performance. However, a stronger and negative relationship emerged between the use of digital audience analytics and the performance of “watchdog” and “civic” roles, leading to an overall increase in conception–performance gaps on both roles. Moreover, journalists’ use of digital community tools was more strongly and positively associated with “infotainment” and “interventionism.”
Belair-GagnonV.NelsonJ. L.LewisS. C. (2019). Audience engagement, reciprocity, and the pursuit of community connectedness in public media journalism. Journalism Practice, 13(5), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1542975
2.
BjerknesF. (2022). Images of transgressions: Visuals as reconstructed evidence in digital investigative journalism. Journalism Studies, 23(8), 951–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2061574
3.
BlanchettN. (2021). Participative gatekeeping: The intersection of news, audience data, newsworkers, and economics. Digital Journalism, 9(6), 773–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1869053
CarsonA.FarhallK. (2018). Understanding collaborative investigative journalism in a “post-truth” age. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1899–1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1494515
6.
ChristinA. (2018). Counting clicks: Quantification and variation in web journalism in the United States and France. American Journal of Sociology, 123(5), 1382–1415. https://doi.org/10.1086/696137
7.
ChuaS.WestlundO. (2019). Audience-centric engagement, collaboration culture and platform counterbalancing. Media and Communication, 7(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1760
EdgerlyS.VragaE. (2019). News, entertainment, or both? Exploring audience perceptions of media genre in a hybrid media environment. Journalism, 20(6), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917730
11.
FawziN.MothesC. (2020). Perceptions of media performance: Expectation-evaluation discrepancies and their relationship with media-related and populist attitudes. Media and Communication, 8(3), 335–347. https://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3142
FerrucciP. (2020). It is in the numbers: How market orientation impacts journalists’ use of news metrics. Journalism, 21(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807056
14.
FlegelR. C.ChaffeeS. H. (1971). Influences of editors, readers, and personal opinions on reporters. Journalism Quarterly, 48(4), 645–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907104800404
15.
FürstS. (2020). In the service of good journalism and audience interests? How audience metrics affect news quality. Media and Communication, 8(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3228
16.
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 35–71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25621396
17.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
18.
HaseV.BoczekK.ScharkowM. (2023). Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital Journalism11(8), 1499–1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2128389
HwangH.KimY.KimY. (2018). Influence of discussion incivility on deliberation: An examination of the mediating role of moral indignation. Communication Research, 45(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215616861
23.
KunertJ.FrechJ.BrüggemannM.LilienthalV.LoosenW. (2022). How investigative journalists around the world adopt innovative digital practices. Journalism Studies, 23(7), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2033636
24.
LamotK.PaulussenS. (2020). Six uses of analytics: Digital editors’ perceptions of audience analytics in the newsroom. Journalism Practice, 14(3), 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1617043
25.
LawrenceR. G.RadcliffeD.SchmidtT. R. (2018). Practicing engagement: Participators journalism in the Web 2.0 era. Journalism Practice, 12(10), 1220–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1391712
LowreyW.WooC. W. (2010). The news organization in uncertain times: Business or institution?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901008700103
28.
MäderA.RinsdorfL. (2023). Constructive journalism as an adaptation to a changing media environment. Journalism Studies, 24(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2159859
29.
MelladoC. (Ed.). (2020). Beyond journalistic norms: Role performance and news in comparative perspective. Routledge.
30.
MelladoC.HermidaA. (2023). The journalist on social media: Mapping the promoter, celebrity and joker roles on Twitter and Instagram. Digital Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2151484
31.
MelladoC.MothesC. (2020). Measuring the link between professional role conceptions, perceived role enactment, and journalistic role performance across countries. In MelladoC. (Ed.), Beyond journalistic norms: Role performance and news in comparative perspective (pp. 147–166). Routledge.
32.
MelladoC.MothesC.HallinD. C.HumanesM. L.LauberM.MickJ.SilkeH.SparksC.AmadoA.DavydovS.OliveraD. (2020). Investigating the gap between newspaper journalists’ role conceptions and role performance in nine European, Asian, and Latin American countries. The International Journal of Press/politics, 25(4), 552–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220910106
MoranR. E.ShaikS. J. (2022). Robots in the news and newsrooms: Unpacking meta-journalistic discourse on the use of artificial intelligence in journalism. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1756–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2085129
35.
Moreno-GilV.RamonX.Rodríguez-MartínezM. (2021). Fact-checking interventions as counteroffensives to disinformation growth: Standards, values, and practices in Latin America and Spain. Media and Communication, 9(1), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3443
36.
Moreno-GilV.Ramos-VegasX.Mauri-RíosM. (2022). Bringing journalism back to its roots: Examining fact-checking practices, methods, and challenges in the Mediterranean context. Profesional de la información, 31(2), Article e310215. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.15
MothesC.Knobloch-WesterwickS.PearsonG. (2019). The PFAD-HEC model: Impacts of news attributes and use motivations on selective news exposure. Communication Theory, 29(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty033
39.
NelsonJ. L. (2021). The next media regime: The pursuit of “audience engagement” in journalism. Journalism, 22(9), 2350–2367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919862375
40.
NelsonJ. L.TandocE. C.Jr. (2019). Doing “well” or doing “good”: What audience analytics reveal about journalism’s competing goals. Journalism Studies, 20(13), 1960–1976. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1547122
OttoL.GloggerI.BoukesM. (2016). The softening of journalistic political communication. Communication Theory, 27(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12102
44.
PowersM.Vera-ZambranoS. (2018). How journalists use social media in France and the United States. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2728–2744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731566
45.
SchudsonM. (2011). The sociology of news (2nd ed.). W.W. Norton & Co.
46.
SchulzA.WirthW.MüllerP. (2020). We are the people and you are fake news: A social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions. Communication Research, 47(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854
47.
ShoemakerP.ReeseS. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective (3rd ed.). Routledge.
48.
SingerJ.LewisS. C.Wahl-JorgensenK. (2023). Journalism in the Quarterly: A century of change in the industry and the academy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(4), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231189455
49.
SkovsgaardM.AndersenK. (2020). Conceptualizing news avoidance: Towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies, 21(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1686410
TandocE. C.Jr. (2015). Why web analytics click: Factors affecting the ways journalists use audience metrics. Journalism Studies, 16(6), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.946309
52.
TandocE. C.Jr.HellmuellerL.VosT. (2013). Mind the gap: Between role conception and role enactment. Journalism Practice, 7(5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.726503
Van AelstP.StrömbäckJ.AalbergT.EsserF.de VreeseC.MatthesJ.HopmannD.SalgadoS.HubeN.StępińskaA.PapathanassopoulosS.BerganzaR.LegnanteG.ReinemannC.SheaferT.StanyerJ. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
55.
van DalenA.de VreeseC.AlbækE. (2012). Different roles, different content? A four-country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting styles of political journalists. Journalism, 13(7), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431538
WeaverD. H.WilhoitG. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: U.S. news people at the end of an era. Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
WeaverD. H.WillnatL.WilhoitG. C. (2019). The American journalist in the digital age: Another look at U.S. news people. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018778242
59.
WelbersK.van AtteveldtW.KleinnijenhuisJ.RuigrokN.SchaperJ. (2016). News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism, 17(8), 1037–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915595474
60.
WojcieszakM.GarrettR. K. (2018). Social identity, selective exposure, and affective polarization: How priming national identity shapes attitudes toward immigrants via news selection. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqx010
61.
ZhangX.LiW. (2020). From social media with news: Journalists’ social media use for sourcing and verification. Journalism Practice, 14(10), 1193–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1689372
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
