This study considered the impact of gender on visual coverage of the top 12 candidates in the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary. Using Microsoft Azure’s Face API, we analyzed 9,529 still images from 43 mainstream news sources for facial emotion (happiness, anger, neutrality) and prominence (close-up, medium, long shots). We found visual evidence for an age-old narrative that undermines confidence in women’s leadership fitness: They were presented as emotionally less composed than men. Although we found no gender differences for facial prominence per se, its interaction with facial emotion gave nuance to gender differences in visual coverage of leadership performances.
AbramowitzA. I. (1989). Viability, electability, and candidate choice in a presidential primary election: A test of competing models. The Journal of Politics, 51(4), 977–992.
2.
ArcherD.IritaniB.KimesD. D.BarriosM. (1983). Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 725–735.
3.
BallewI. I.CharlesC.TodorovA. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 17948–17953.
4.
BarrettA. W.BarringtonL. W. (2005). Bias in newspaper photograph selection. Political Research Quarterly, 58(4), 609–618.
5.
BartkoJ. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19(1), 3–11.
6.
BauerN. M. (2020). The qualifications gap: Why women must be better than men to win political office. Cambridge University Press.
7.
BellM. A.KaufmannK. M. (2015). The electoral consequences of marriage and motherhood: How gender traits influence voter evaluations of female candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 36(1), 1–21.
8.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155.
9.
BenjaminD. J.ShapiroJ. M. (2009). Thin-slice forecasts of gubernatorial elections. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 523–536.
10.
BissellK. (2000). Culture and gender as factors in photojournalism gatekeeping. Visual Communication Quarterly, 7(2), 9–12.
11.
BooneR. T.BuckR. (2003). Emotional expressivity and trustworthiness: The role of nonverbal behavior in the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(3), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025341931128
12.
BoussalisC.CoanT. G.HolmanM. R.MüllerS. (2021). Gender, candidate emotional expression, and voter reactions during televised debates. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1242–1257.
13.
BrescollV. L. (2016). Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 415–428.
14.
BretlD. J.CantorJ. (1988). The portrayal of men and women in U.S. television commercials: A recent content analysis and trends over 15 years. Sex Roles, 18(9–10), 595–609.
15.
BrightonP.FoyD. (2007). News values. SAGE.
16.
BrooksD. J. (2011). Testing the double standard for candidate emotionality: Voter reactions to the tears and anger of male and female politicians. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 597–615.
17.
BrooksD. J. (2013). He runs, she runs: Why gender stereotypes do not harm women candidates. Princeton University Press.
18.
BucyE. P.BradleyS. D. (2004). Presidential expressions and viewer emotion: Counterempathic responses to televised leader displays. Social Science Information / Information sur les Sciences Sociales, 43(1), 59–94.
19.
BucyE. P.GrabeM. E. (2008). “Happy warriors” revisited: Hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news. Politics and the Life Sciences, 27(1), 78–98.
20.
BucyE. P.JooJ. (2021). Editors’ introduction: Visual politics, grand collaborative programs, and the opportunity to think big. The International Journal of Press/politics, 26(1), 5–20.
21.
CapleH.BednarekM. (2016). Rethinking news values: What a discursive approach can tell us about the construction of news discourse and news photography. Journalism, 17(4), 435–455.
22.
CashdanE. (1998). Smiles, speech, and body posture: How women and men display sociometric status and power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22(4), 209–228.
23.
ColemanR.WuD. (2015). Image and emotion in voter decisions: The affect agenda. Lexington Books.
24.
CopelandG. A. (1989). Face-ism and primetime television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33(2), 209–214.
25.
De SmaeleH.GeenenE.De CockR. (2017). Visual gatekeeping: Selection of news photographs at a Flemish newspaper: A qualitative inquiry into the photo news desk. Nordicom Review, 38, Article 414.
26.
DickM. (2014). Interactive infographics and news values. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 490–506.
27.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188.
28.
DolanK. A. (2014). When does gender matter? Women candidates and gender stereotypes in American elections. Oxford University Press.
29.
DonsbachW. (2004). Psychology of news decisions: Factors behind journalists’ professional behavior. Journalism, 5(2), 131–157.
30.
EkmanP. (1982). Emotion in the human face. Cambridge University Press.
31.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Prentice-Hall.
32.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (2003). Unmasking the face. Malor Books.
33.
EntmanR. M. (1990). Modern racism and the images of blacks in local television news. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 7(4), 332–345.
34.
EntmanR. M. (1992). Blacks in the news: Television, modern racism and cultural change. Journalism Quarterly, 69(2), 341–361.
35.
FahmyS. (2005). Photojournalists’ and photo editors’ attitudes and perceptions: The visual coverage of 9/11 and the Afghan war. Visual Communication Quarterly, 12(3–4), 146–163.
36.
FarroniT.JohnsonM. H.MenonE.ZulianL.FaragunaD.CsibraG. (2005). Newborns’ preference for face-relevant stimuli: Effects of contrast polarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(47), 17245–17250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502205102
37.
FischbachA.LichtenthalerP. W.HorstmannN. (2015). Leadership and gender stereotyping of emotions: Think manager—Think male?Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000136
38.
FongC.TylerM. (2021). Machine learning predictions as regression covariates. Political Analysis, 29(4), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2020.38
GansH. J. (2004). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. Northwestern University Press.
41.
GottfriedJ.ShearerE. (2016). News use across social media platforms 2016. Pew Research.
42.
GrabeM. E.BucyE. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. Oxford University Press.
43.
GrossmannT.JohnsonM. H.VaishA.HughesD. A.QuinqueD.StonekingM.FriedericiA. D. (2011). Genetic and neural dissociation of individual responses to emotional expressions in human infants. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 57–66.
44.
GrossmanM.WoodW. (1993). Sex differences in intensity of emotional experience: A social role interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1010.
45.
HaimM.JungblutM. (2020). Politicians’ self-depiction and their news portrayal: Evidence from 28 countries using visual computational analysis. Political Communication, 38, 55–74.
46.
HallC. C. I.CrumM. J. (1994). Women and “body-isms” in television beer commercials. Sex Roles, 31(5–6), 329–337.
47.
HarcupT.O’NeillD. (2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488.
48.
HehmanE.GraberE. C.HoffmanL. H.GaertnerS. L. (2012). Warmth and competence: A content analysis of photographs depicting American presidents. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026513
49.
HeilmanM. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00234
50.
HermanE. S.ChomskyN. (2010). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Random House.
51.
HirdmanA. (2010). Vision and intimacy: Gendered communication online. Nordicom Review, 31(1), 3–13.
52.
HoriuchiY.KomatsuT.NakayaF. (2012). Should candidates smile to win elections? An application of automated face recognition technology. Political Psychology, 33(6), 925–933.
53.
HuddyL.TerkildsenN. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 119–147.
54.
IyengarS. (2011). The media game: New moves, old strategies. The Forum, 9(1), 16–23.
55.
JamiesonK. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford University Press on Demand.
56.
JamiesonK. H.HallK. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford University Press on Demand.
57.
JamiesonK. H. (Ed.). (2006). Electing the president 2004: The insiders’ view. University of Pennsylvania Press.
58.
JooJ.BucyE. P.SeidelC. (2019). Automated coding of televised leader displays: Detecting nonverbal political behavior with computer vision and deep learning. International Journal of Communication, 13. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10725
59.
KilgoD.BoutlerT. R.ColemanR. (2018). Face value: Linking nonverbal cues to character traits in impression formation of politicians. International Journal of Communication, 12, Article 24.
60.
KleinJ. (2006). Politics lost: How American democracy was trivialized by people who think you’re stupid. Doubleday.
61.
KnutsonB. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(3), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02281954
62.
KobréK. (2008). Photojournalism: The Professionals’ Approach. Focal Press.
63.
KonrathS.AuJ.RamseyL. R. (2012). Cultural differences in face-ism: Male politicians have bigger heads in more gender-equal cultures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(4), 476–487.
64.
KonrathS. H.SchwarzN. (2007). Do male politicians have big heads? Face-ism in online self-representations of politicians. Media Psychology, 10(3), 436–448.
65.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
66.
KrumhuberE.MansteadA. S. R.KappasA. (2007). Temporal aspects of facial displays in person and expression perception: The effects of smile dynamics, head-tilt, and gender. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31(1), 39–56.
67.
LawlessJ. L. (2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 479–490.
68.
LeDouxJ. E.PhelpsE. A. (2008). Emotional networks in the brain. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.Feldman BarrettL. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 159–179). Guilford Press.
69.
MakhortykhM.UrmanA.UlloaR. (2021). Detecting race and gender bias in visual representation of AI on Web search engines. In BorattoL.FaralliS.MarrasM.StiloG. (Eds.), Advances in bias and fairness in information retrieval (pp. 36–50). Springer.
70.
MarkkulaM.SormunenE. (2000). End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive. Information Retrieval, 1(4), 259–285.
71.
MarlandA. (2012). Political photography, journalism, and framing in the digital age: The management of visual media by the prime minister of Canada. The International Journal of Press/politics, 17(2), 214–233.
72.
MaschL.GassnerA.RosarU. (2021). Can a beautiful smile win the vote?: The role of candidates’ physical attractiveness and facial expressions in elections. Politics and the Life Sciences, 40(2), 213–223.
73.
MastersR. D. (1981). Linking ethology and political science: Photographs, political attention, and presidential elections. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, 7, 61–80.
74.
MastersR. D.FreyS.BenteG. (1991). Dominance and attention: Images of leaders in German, French, and American TV news. Polity, 25, 373–394.
75.
MastersR. D.SullivanD. G. (1989). Nonverbal displays and political leadership in France and the United States. Political behavior, 11(2), 123–156.
76.
MastersR. D.SullivanD. G. (1993). Nonverbal behavior and leadership: Emotion and cognition in political information processing. In IyengarS.McGuireW. J. (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 150–182). Duke University Press.
77.
MastersR. D.SullivanD. G.FeolaA.McHugoG. J. (1987). Television coverage of candidates’ display behavior during the 1984 Democratic primaries in the United States. International Political Science Review, 8(2), 121–130.
78.
MatsumotoD.HwangH. S. (2012). Culture and emotion: The integration of biological and cultural contributions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(1), 91–118.
79.
MatthewsJ. L. (2007). Hidden sexism: Facial prominence and its connections to gender and occupational status in popular print media. Sex Roles, 57(7), 515–525.
80.
McChesneyR. W. (2000). The political economy of communication and the future of the field. Media, Culture & Society, 22(1), 109–116.
81.
McDermottR. (2004). The feeling of rationality: The meaning of neuroscientific advances for political science. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 691–706.
82.
McGregorS. C.MourãoR. R. (2016). Talking politics on Twitter: Gender, elections, and social networks. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), Article 64218.
83.
McHugoG. J.LanzettaJ. T.SullivanD. G.MastersR. D.EnglisB. G. (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader’s expressive displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1513.
84.
MetzM.KruikemeierS.LechelerS. (2020). Personalization of politics on Facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1481–1498.
MoffittB. (2020). The global rise of populism. Stanford University Press.
87.
OlivolaC. Y.TodorovA. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 83–110.
88.
OlivolaC. Y.TodorovA. (2017). The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives. Behavioral and brain sciences, 40, e38.
O’TooleA. J. (2005). Psychological and neural perspectives on human face recognition. In LiS. Z.JainA. K. (Eds.), Handbook of face recognition (pp. 349–369). Springer.
PaffJ. L.LaknerH. B. (1997). Dress and the female gender role in magazine advertisements of 1950–1994: A content analysis. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 26(1), 29–58.
93.
PengY. (2018). Same candidates, different faces: Uncovering media bias in visual portrayals of presidential candidates with computer vision. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 920–941.
94.
PengY. (2020). What makes politicians’ Instagram posts popular? Analyzing social media strategies of candidates and office holders with computer vision. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26, 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220964769
95.
PlantE. A.HydeJ. S.KeltnerD.DevineP. G. (2000). The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(1), 81–92.
96.
PrenticeD. A.CarranzaE. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281.
97.
PrielerM.KohlbacherF. (2017). Face-ism from an international perspective: Gendered self-presentation in online dating sites across seven countries. Sex Roles, 77(9), 604–614.
98.
ReadG. L.PavelkoR. L.HwangH. (2017). Social and evolutionary explanations for Face-ism: Facial prominence in female academic profile pictures. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 98–105.
99.
RennerA.MaschL. (2019). Emotional woman: Rational man? Gender stereotypical emotional expressivity of German politicians in news broadcasts. Communications, 44(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0048
100.
RudmanL. A.Moss-RacusinC. A.PhelanJ. E.NautsS. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.Jesp.2011.10.008
101.
SchultzI. (2007). The journalistic gut feeling: Journalistic doxa, news habitus and orthodox news values. Journalism Practice, 1(2), 190–207.
102.
SchwarzN.KurzE. (1989). What’s in a picture? The impact of Face-ism on trait attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19(4), 311–316.
103.
SchwemmerC.KnightC.Bello-PardoE. D.OklobdzijaS.SchoonveldeM.LockhartJ. W. (2020). Diagnosing gender bias in image recognition systems. Socius, 6, Article 967171. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120967171
104.
SczesnyS.KaufmannM. C. (2018). Self-presentation in online professional networks: Men’s higher and women’s lower facial prominence in self-created profile images. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2295.
105.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge.
106.
SmithL. R.CooleyS. C. (2012). International faces: An analysis of self-inflicted face-ism in online profile pictures. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(3), 279–296.
107.
SmithL. R.SandersonJ. (2015). I’m going to Instagram it! An analysis of athlete self-presentation on Instagram. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 342–358.
108.
SmithsonM.VerkuilenJ. (2006). A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 54–71.
109.
SprecherS.SedikidesC. (1993). Gender differences in perceptions of emotionality: The case of close heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 28(9), 511–530.
110.
StahelL.SchoenC. (2020). Female journalists under attack? Explaining gender differences in reactions to audiences’ attacks. New Media & Society, 22(10), 1849–1867.
111.
StegerW. P. (2007). Who wins nominations and why? An updated forecast of the presidential primary vote. Political Research Quarterly, 60(1), 91–99.
112.
StewartP. A.BucyE. P.MehuM. (2015). Strengthening bonds and connecting with followers: A biobehavioral inventory of political smiles. Politics and the Life Sciences, 34(1), 73–92.
113.
SullivanD. G.MastersR. D. (1988). “Happy warriors”: Leaders’ facial displays, viewers’ emotions, and political support. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 345–368.
114.
SullivanD. G.MastersR. D.LanzettaJ. T.McHugoG. J.EnglisB. G.PlateE. F.SchubertG. (1991). Facial displays and political leadership: Some experimental findings. In SchubertG.MastersR. D. (Eds.), Primate politics (pp. 188–206). Southern Illinois University Press.
115.
SullivanD. G.MastersR. D.SomitA.PetersonS. A. (1994). Biopolitics, the media, and leadership: Nonverbal cues, emotions, and trait attributions in the evaluation of leaders. Research in Biopolitics, 2, 237–273.
116.
SzillisU.StahlbergD. (2007). The face-ism effect in the internet differences in facial prominence of women and men. International Journal of Internet Science, 2(1), 3–11.
TevenJ. J.HansonT. L. (2004). The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 52(1), 39–53.
119.
WagnerM. W.GruszczynskiM. (2018). Who gets covered? Ideological extremity and news coverage of members of the U.S. Congress, 1993 to 2013. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 670–690.
120.
WatnaW.RoarkV. (1994). Response to photographs. Visual Communication Quarterly, 1(2), 12–13.
121.
WantaW.LeggettD. (1989). Gender stereotypes in wire service sports photos. Newspaper Research Journal, 10(3), 105–114.
122.
WeaverD.BeamR.BrownleeB.VoakesP.WilhoitG. C. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century. Lawrence Erlbaum.
123.
WilliamsN. W.CasasA.WilkersonJ. D. (2020). Images as data for social science research: An introduction to convolutional neural nets for image classification. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
