This article examines differences in news coverage of female candidates using a media sociology framework that examines the interplay between organizational, routine, and individual levels of influence. The analyses find that national and local newspapers are more likely to write about the political qualifications of female candidates relative to male candidates, and female journalists at local newspapers are most likely to write about women’s political qualifications. Female candidates receive more feminine stereotypic coverage across newspapers, especially in all-women elections. These results uncover important differences across media organizations that affect how female candidates develop their campaign strategies and voter decision-making.
AdayS.DevittJ. (2001). Style over substance: Newspaper coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s presidential bid. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(2), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/108118001129172134
2.
ArmstrongC. L. (2004). The influence of journalist gender on source selection in newspaper stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100110
3.
BanwartM. C.BystromD. G.RobertsonT. A. (2003). From the primary to the general election: A comparative analysis of candidate media coverage in mixed-gender 2000 races for Governor and U.S. Senate. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(5), 658–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202238491
4.
BauerN. M. (2015). Emotional, sensitive, and unfit for office: Gender stereotype activation and support for female candidates. Political Psychology, 36(6), 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12186
5.
BauerN. M. (2020a). The qualification gap: Why women must be more qualified than men to win political office. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BauerN. M. (2020b). Shifting standards: How voters evaluate the qualifications of female and male candidates. Journal of Politics, 82(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1086/705817
7.
BlighM. C.ShlehoferM. M.CasadB. J.GaffneyA. M. (2012). Competent enough, but would you vote for her? Gender stereotypes and media influences on perceptions of women politicians. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(3), 560–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00781.x
8.
BodeL.HenningsV. M. (2012). Mixed signals? Gender and the media’s coverage of the 2008 vice presidential candidates. Politics & Policy, 40(2), 221–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00350.x
9.
BourqueS. C.GrossholtzJ. (1974). Politics as unnatural practice: Political science looks at female participation. Politics & Society, 4, 225–266.
10.
BradenM. (1996). Women politicians and the media. University of Kentucky Press.
11.
BrantonR.EnglishA.PetteyS.BarnesT. D. (2018). The impact of gender and quality opposition on the relative assessment of candidate competency. Electoral Studies, 54, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.002
12.
BrownE. R.DiekmanA. B.SchneiderM. C. (2011). A change will do us good: Threats diminish typical preferences for male leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 930–941.
13.
BystromD. G.BanwartM. C.KaidL. L.RobertsonT. A. (2005). Gender and candidate communication: Videostyle, webStyle, newsStyle. Routledge.
14.
CarrollS. J.SanbonmatsuK. (2013). More women can run: Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. Oxford University Press.
15.
ConroyM. (2015). Masculinity, media, and the American presidency. Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
Crowder-MeyerM.CoopermanR. (2018). Can’t buy them love: How party culture among donors contributes to the party gap in women’s representation. Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1086/698848
DarrJ. P.HittM. P.DunawayJ. L. (2021). Home style opinion: How local newspapers can slow polarization. Cambridge University Press
19.
DearingJ. W.RogersE. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. SAGE.
20.
DeasonG.GreenleeJ. S.LangerC. A. (2015). Mothers on the campaign trail: Implications of politicized motherhood on women in politics. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(1), 133–148.
21.
de BruinM. (2000). Gender, organizational and professional identities in journalism. Journalism, 1(2), 217–238.
22.
DitontoT. M. (2017). A high bar or a double standard? Gender, competence, and information in political campaigns. Political Behavior, 39(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5
23.
DitontoT. M. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of prejudice: Sexism, information, and voting behavior in political campaigns. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7, 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1632065
24.
DitontoT. M.HamiltonA. J.RedlawskD. P. (2014). Gender stereotypes, information search, and voting behavior in political campaigns. Political Behavior, 36(2), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9232-6
25.
DunawayJ. L. (2008). Markets, ownership, and the quality of campaign news coverage. Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608081140
FultonS. A. (2012). Running backwards and in high heels: The gendered quality gap and incumbent electoral success. Political Research Quarterly, 65(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911401419
29.
FultonS. A.MaestasC. D.MaiselL. S.StoneW. J. (2006). The sense of a woman: Gender ambition, and the decision to run for congress. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 235–148.
30.
GansH. J. (1980). Deciding what’s news. Vintage.
31.
GolanG. (2006). Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 323–333.
32.
GreenleeJ. S. (2014). The political consequences of motherhood. University of Michigan Press.
33.
HawkesworthM. (2003). Congressional enactments of race–gender: Toward a theory of raced–gendered institutions. American Political Science Review, 97, 4529–4550.
34.
HayesD.LawlessJ. L. (2016). Women on the run: Gender, media, and political campaigns in a polarized Era. Cambridge University Press.
35.
HeldmanC. J.CarrollS. J.OlsonS. (2005). “She brought only a skirt”: Print media coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s bid for the republican presidential nomination. Political Communication, 22, 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006564
36.
HolmanM. R.MerollaJ. L.ZechmeisterE. J.WangD. (2019). Terrorism, gender, and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Electoral Studies, 61, 1–8.
37.
HuddyL.TerkildsenN. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119–147. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111526
KahnK. F. (1996). The political consequences of being a woman: How stereotypes influence the conduct and consequences of political campaigns. Columbia University Press.
40.
KatsuoN.TownerT. L.ClawsonR. A.WalternbergE. N. (2009). Interviewing the interviewers: Journalistic norms and racial diversity in the newsroom. Howard Journal of Communication, 20(3), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170903070175
41.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE.
42.
LawrenceR.RoseM. (2010). Hillary Clinton’s race for the White House: Gender politics and the media on the campaign trail. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
43.
MaestasC. L.RugeleyC. R. (2008). Assessing the “experience bonus” through examining strategic entry, candidate quality, and campaign receipts in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 520–535.
McCombsM.FunkM. (2011). Shaping the agenda of local daily newspapers: A methodology merging the agenda setting and community structure perspectives. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 905–919.
46.
McGregorS. C.LawrenceR.CardonaA. (2017). Personalization, gender, and social media: Gubernatorial candidates’ social media strategies. Information, Communication, & Society, 20(2), 264–283.
47.
McHughM. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
MeeksL. (2013). He wrote, she wrote: Journalist gender, political office, and campaign news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012468695
50.
MeeksL. (2016). Gendered styles, gendered differences: Candidates’ use of personalization and interactivity on Twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(4), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160268
51.
MeeksL.DomkeD. (2016). When politics is a woman’s game: Party and gender ownership in woman-versus-woman elections. Communication Research, 43(7), 895–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215581369
52.
PalmerB.SimonD. M. (2005). When women run against women: The hidden influence of female incumbents in elections to the US House of representatives. Politics & Gender, 1, 39–63.
53.
PalmgreenP.ClarkeP. (1977). Agenda-setting with local and national issues. Communication Research, 4(4), 435–452.
54.
PearsonK.McGheeE. (2013). What it takes to win: Questioning “gender neutral” outcomes in U.S. House elections. Politics & Gender, 9, 439–462.
55.
Pihl-ThingvadS. (2015). Professional ideals and daily practice in journalism. Journalism, 16(3), 392–411.
56.
PrenticeD. A.CarranzaE. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066
57.
RidoutT. N.FowlerE. F.SearlesK. (2012). Exploring the validity of electronic newspaper databases. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(6), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.638221
58.
RodgersS.ThorsonE. (2003). A socialization perspective on male and female reporting. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 658–675.
59.
SchneiderM. C.BosA. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40(Suppl. 1), 173–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12573
60.
SchudsonM. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American public life. Harvard University Press.
61.
Schwindt-BayerL.Reyes-HouseholderC. (2017). Citizen responses to female executives: Is it sex, novelty or both?Politics, Groups, and Identities, 5(3), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1283238
62.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge.
63.
ShorE.RijtA.v d MiltsovA. (2019). Do women in the newsroom make a difference? Coverage sentiment toward women and men as a function of newsroom composition. Sex Roles, 81, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014563523
64.
SmithK. B. (1997). When all’s fair: Signs of parity in media coverage of female candidates. Political Communication, 14, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199542
65.
SplichalS. L.GarrisonB. (1995). Gender as a factor in newsroom managers’ views on covering the private lives of politicians. Mass Communication Review, 22, 12101–108.
66.
SuiM.PaulN.ShahP.SpurlockB.ChastantB.DunawayJ. L. (2018). The role of minority journalists, candidates, and audiences in shaping race-related campaign news coverage. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(4), 1079–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018762078
67.
Sweet-CushmanJ. (2021). Legislative vs. executive political offices: How gender stereotypes can disadvantage women in either office. Political Behavior, Forthcoming, 44, 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09721-x
68.
ThomsenD. (2015). Why so few (republican) women? Explaining the partisan imbalance in the US congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 295–323.
69.
TurcotteJ.FureyL.Garcia-OrtegoJ. O.HernandezN.SiccionC.StephensonE. (2021). The novelty news frame: How social identity influences policy attention of minority presidential candidates. Newspaper Research Journal, 42, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532921990146
70.
van der PasD. J.AalderingL. (2020). Gender differences in political media coverage: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(1), 114–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz046
71.
WardO. (2016). Seeing double: Race, gender, and coverage of minority women’s campaigns for the U.S. House of representatives. Politics & Gender, 12, 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000222
72.
ZochL. M.TurkJ. V. (1998). Women making news: Gender as a variable in source selection and use. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 762–775.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
