Integrating Power and Gradual Institutional Change in Public Relations History: The Case of the People’s University in North Carolina After the Civil War
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2023
Integrating Power and Gradual Institutional Change in Public Relations History: The Case of the People’s University in North Carolina After the Civil War
Drawing on the theory of gradual institutional change, this study analyzed the post-Civil War college reform efforts in North Carolina, integrating power with public relations history. Reformers worked under harsh institutional circumstances where resident elites held high veto power, while reformers had a low level of discretion for interpreting college education. Notwithstanding, reformers adopted layering tactics, introducing new rules of education for all alongside existing ones of education as legacy, for gradual institutional change. Specifically, reformers maintained a calm and objective tone, focusing on the universal value of education, both publicly and through anonymous publications in hostile press venues.
AbbottR. (2004). For free press and equal rights: Republican newspapers in the Reconstruction South. The University of Georgia Press.
2.
Anonymous. (1869a). No Title. The Weekly North-carolina Standard, 3.
3.
Anonymous. (1869b, January2). The university. The Daily Standard, 2.
4.
Anonymous. (1869c, January7). The university. The Tarborough Southerner, 2.
5.
Anonymous. (1869d, January8). The university. The Wilmington Journal, 1.
6.
Anonymous. (1869e, January13). University reconstruction. The Weekly North-Carolina Standard, 3.
7.
Anonymous. (1869f, March23). The legislature. The Daily Standard, 2.
8.
Anonymous. (1869g, May12). The university and the North Carolina presbyterian. The Weekly North-Carolina Standard, 1.
9.
Anonymous. (1869h, June6). The university. The Daily Journal, 2.
10.
Anonymous. (1869i, June23). The faculty and president are patriot. The Weekly North-Carolina Standard, 3.
11.
Anonymous. (1869j, September16). The university. The Tarborough Southerner, 2.
12.
Anonymous. (1869k, November25). The university. The Tarborough Southerner, 1.
13.
Anonymous. (1870, September21). Editors of the old North State. The Weekly North-Carolina Standard, 4.
14.
BannermanS.HaggartB. (2015). Historical institutionalism in communication studies. Communication Theory, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12051
15.
BartlettJ. L.TywoniakS.HatcherC. (2007). Public relations professional practice and the institutionalisation of CSR. Journal of Communication Management, 11(4), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540710843904
16.
BattleK. (1907). History of the University of North Carolina. The University of North Carolina Press.
17.
BergerB. K. (2007). Public relations and organizational power. In TothE. L. (Ed.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management: Challenges for the next generation (pp. 221–234). Routledge.
18.
BrownR. E. (2015). The public relations of everything: The ancient, modern and postmodern dramatic history of an idea. Routledge.
19.
CampbellJ. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684
20.
CarterD. T. (1985). When the war was over: The failure of self-reconstruction in the South, 1865—1867. Louisiana State University Press.
21.
ChapmanJ. K. (2006). Black freedom and the University of North Carolina, 1793-1960. The University of North Carolina Press.
22.
CiszekE. L. (2017). Activist strategic communication for social change: A transnational case study of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender activism. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 702–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12319
23.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2010). PR strategy and application: Managing influence. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
24.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2012). Privileging an activist vs. a corporate view of public relations history in the U.S. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.11.010
25.
CornelissenJ. P.DurandR.FissP. C.LammersJ. C.VaaraE. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381
26.
CurtinP. A. (2008). Fred Harvey company public relations and publicity (1876-1933). Journal of Communication Management, 12(4), 359–373.
27.
CurtinP. A.GaitherT. K. (2005). Privileging identity, difference, and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1702
28.
CurtinP. A.GaitherT. K. (2007). International public relation: Negotiating culture, identity, and power. SAGE.
29.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1935). Black reconstruction in America, 1860-1880: An essay toward a history of the part which black folk played in the attempt to reconstruct democracy in America, 1860-1880. Harcourt, Brace and Co.
30.
EdwardsL. (2012). Defining the “object” of public relations research: A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry, 1(1), 7–30.
31.
FonerE. (1982). Reconstruction revisited. Reviews in American History, 10(4), 82–100.
32.
FonerE. (1988). Reconstruction: America’s unfinished revolution, 1863-1877. The new American nation series (Vol. 9). Harper & Row.
33.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
34.
FrandsenF.JohansenW. (2013). Public relations and the new institutionalism: In search of a theoretical framework. Public Relations Inquiry, 2(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x13485353
35.
FredrikssonM.PallasJ. (2014). Strategic communication as institutional work. In HoltzhausenD.ZerfassA. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 143–156). Routledge.
36.
FredrikssonM.PallasJ.WehmeierS. (2013). Public relations and neo-institutional theory. Public Relations Inquiry, 2(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x13485956
37.
GowerK. (2008). US corporate public relations in the progressive era. Journal of Communication Management, 12, 305–318.
38.
GradyB. F. (1869, November13). Prof. Solomon Pool, President of the University of N.C. The Daily Journal, 1.
39.
GrunigL. A.GrunigJ. E.DozierD. M. (2002). Excellence public relations and effective organizations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
HallP. A. (2010). Historical institutionalism in rationalist and sociological perspective. In MahoneyJ.ThelenK. (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 204–223). Cambridge University Press.
41.
HouJ. H. (2020). The articulation of “agency”: How can public relations scholarship and institutional theory enrich each other?Public Relations Inquiry, 10(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X20932136
42.
HumeR. L.GoughJ. B. (2008). Blacks, carpetbaggers, and scalawags: The constitutional conventions of radical reconstruction. Louisiana State University Press.
43.
JohnR. (2006). Black agency after slavery. In BrownT. J. (Ed.), Reconstructions: New perspectives on the postbellum United States (pp. 40–65). Oxford University Press.
44.
KnightE. (1916). Public school education in North Carolina. Houghton Mifflin Company.
45.
LammeM. O.L’EtangJ.St JohnB.III (2009). The state of public relations history. American Journalism, 26(1), 156–159.
46.
LammeM. O.RussellK. M. (2010). Removing the spin: Toward a new theory of public relations history. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 11(4), 281–362.
47.
LammersJ. C. (2011). How institutions communicate: Institutional messages, institutional logics, and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 154–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318910389280
L’EtangJ. (2008). Writing PR history: Issues, methods and politics. Journal of Communication Management, 12, 319–335.
50.
L’EtangJ. (2014). Foreword: The challenges of engaging public relations history. In St. JohnB.IIILammeM. O.L’EtangJ. (Eds.), Pathways to public relations: Histories of practice and profession (pp. xii–svii). Routledge.
51.
L’EtangJ. (2015). Where is public relations histography? Philosophy of history, histography and public relations. In WatsonT. (Ed.), Perspectives on public relations histography and historical theorization: Other voices (pp. 69–84). Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
MahoneyJ.ThelenK. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In MahoneyJ.ThelenK. (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge University Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=PACmgwrYeRMC&pgis=1
53.
McHoulA.GraceW. (1993). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. Melbourne University Press.
54.
MillerK. (2000). U.S. public relations history: Knowledge and limitations. Annals of the International Communication Association, 23(1), 381–420.
55.
MotionJ. (2005). Participative public relations: Power to the people or legitimacy for government discourse?Public Relations Review, 31, 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.009
56.
MyersC. (2015). Reconsidering propaganda in U.S. public relations history: An analysis of propaganda in the popular press 1810 – 1918. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.05.010
57.
A North Carolinian. (1869a, August6). University and the public schools. Raleigh Sentinel, 2.
58.
A North Carolinian. (1869b, September21). University and public schools (no. 4. Concluded). Raleigh Sentinel, 2.
59.
OrangeM. citizens of. (1869, June11). The university. The Wilmington Journal, 2.
60.
OsthausC. (1994). Partisans of the Southern press: Editorial spokesmen of the nineteenth century. The University Press of Kentucky.
61.
PodnarK.GolobU. (2009). Reconstruction of public relations history through publications in Public Opinion Quarterly. Journal of Communication Management, 13(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540910931391
PowellW. S. (1992). The first state university: A pictorial history of the University of North Carolina. The University of North Carolina Press.
64.
RussellK. M.LammeM. O. (2016). Theorizing public relations history: The roles of strategic intent and human agency. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.04.002
St JohnB.IIILammeM. O.L’EtangJ. (Eds.). (2014). Pathways to public relations: Histories of practice and profession. Routledge.
69.
StokerK.RawlinsB. L. (2005). The light of publicity in the progressive era: From searchlight to flashlight. Journalism History, 30, 177–188.
70.
TaylorM.KentM. L. (2014). Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(5), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106
71.
TunnellT. (2006). Creating “the propaganda of history”: Southern editors and the origins of Carpetbagger and Scalawag. The Journal of Southern History, 72(4), 789–822. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/27649233
72.
WatsonT. (Ed.). (2015). Perspectives on public relations histography and historical theorization: Other voices. Palgrave Macmillan.
73.
WattsD. (2010). Dictionary of American government and politics. Oxford University Press.
74.
WeirM. (1992). Politics and jobs: The boundaries of employment policy in the United States. Princeton University Press.
75.
ZerfassA. (2009). Institutionalizing strategic communication: Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3(2), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180902810205
