Women reporters are underrepresented in newsrooms and assigned to gender-stereotypic roles, but to what effect? To better understand the role of gender in news making, this article utilizes three survey experiments to investigate the effects of journalists’ gender on reader perceptions toward reporter credibility, outlet credibility, and the relevance of news to them. We find little evidence that readers doubt the credibility of a reporter or a news outlet based on the gender of a reporter, the gender of the source, or the gendered nature of the issue. Our findings have implications for media credibility and newsroom diversity.
AndsagerJ.MastinT. (2003). Racial and regional differences in readers’ evaluations of the credibility of political columnists by race and sex. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 57–72.
5.
ArmstrongC. (2004). The influence of reporter gender on source selection in newspaper stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 139–154.
6.
ArmstrongC.McAdamsM. (2009). Blogs of information: How gender cues and individual motivations influence perceptions of credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01448.x
7.
ArmstrongC.NelsonM. (2005). How newspaper sources trigger gender stereotypes. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 820–837.
BlairI.BanajiM. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142–1163.
10.
BoningerD.KrosnickJ.BerentM. (1995). Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 61–80.
11.
BoydstunA. (2013). Making the news: Politics, the media, and agenda setting. University of Chicago Press.
12.
BrannM.HimesK. (2010). Perceived credibility of male versus female television newscasters. Communication Research Reports, 27(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824091003737869
13.
BrooksD. (2013). He runs, she runs: Why gender stereotypes do not harm women candidates. Princeton University Press.
14.
BucyE. (2003). Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 247–264.
15.
BurkhartF.SigelmanC. (1990). Byline bias? Effects of gender on news article evaluations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 67(3), 492–500.
CarocciN. (1988). Trust and gender ten years later: The more things change. Women’s Studies in Communication, 11, 63–89.
18.
CarrollS.FoxR. (2006). Gender and elections: Shaping the future of American politics. Cambridge University Press.
19.
ComelloM. L. G. (2013). Conceptualizing the intervening roles of identity in communication effects: The prism model. In LasorsaD.RodriguezA. (Eds.), Identity and communication: New agendas in communication (pp. 168–188). Routledge.
20.
CraftS.WantaW. (2004). Women in the newsroom: Influences of female editors and reporters on the news agenda. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 124–138.
21.
CulbertsonH. M.SomerickN. (1976). Quotation marks and bylines—What do they mean to readers?Journalism Quarterly, 53(3), 463–508.
22.
DittmarK. (2015). Navigating gendered terrain: Stereotypes and strategy in political campaigns. Temple University Press.
23.
DolanK. (2004). Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Westview Press.
24.
DolanK. (2008). Is there a “gender affinity effect” in American politics? Information, affect, and candidate sex in U.S. House elections. Political Research Quarterly, 61(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907307518
25.
DolanK. (2010). The impact of gender stereotyped evaluations on support for women candidates. Political Behavior, 32(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9090-4
26.
DruckmanJ. N.KamC. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants. In DruckmanJ.GreeneD.KuklinskiJ.LupiaA. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 41–57). Cambridge University Press.
FlanaginA.MetzgerM. (2003). The perceived credibility of personal web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00021-9
31.
FreedmanE.FicoF. (2005). Male and female sources in newspaper coverage of male and female candidates in open races for governor in 2002. Mass Communication and Society, 8(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0803_5
32.
GazianoC.McGrathK. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451–462.
33.
HarpD. (2007). Desperately seeking women readers: US newspapers and the construction of a female readership. Lexington Books.
34.
HayesD.LawlessJ. L. (2015). A non-gendered lens? Media, voters, and female candidates in contemporary congressional elections. Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 95–118.
35.
HuddyL.TerkildsenN. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119–147.
36.
JohnsonJ. A. (2005). Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from web-based personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.009
37.
KalraP.BoukesM. (2021). Curbing journalistic gender bias: How activating awareness of gender bias in Indian journalists affects their reporting. Journalism Practice, 15(5), 651–668.
38.
KaufmanG. F.LibbyL. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525
39.
KiousisS. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society, 4(4), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_4
KrayL.ThompsonL.GalinskyA. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942
43.
LiY.ThorsonE. (2015). Increasing news content and diversity improves revenue. Newspaper Research Journal, 36(4), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532915618408
44.
LieblerC.SmithS. (1997). Tracking gender differences: A comparative analysis of network correspondents and their sources. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41(1), 58–68.
45.
McDermottR. (2011). New directions for experimental work in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 503–520.
46.
MeeksL. (2013). He wrote, she wrote: Journalist gender, political office, and campaign news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 58–74.
47.
MeeksL. (2018). Questioning the president: Examining gender in the White House press corps. Journalism, 19(4), 519–535.
48.
NorthL. (2016). The gender of “soft” and “hard” news: Female journalists’ views on gendered story allocations. Journalism Studies, 17(3), 356–373.
49.
PowersA.FicoF. (1994). Influences on use of sources at large U.S. newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 15(4), 87–95.
RudmanL.GlickP. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–762.
53.
SanbonmatsuK. (2002). Gender stereotypes and vote choice. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 20–34.
54.
SearlesK.SpencerS.DuruA. (2020). Don’t read the comments: the effects of abusive comments on perceptions of women authors’ credibility. Information, Communication & Society, 23(7), 947–962.
55.
ShorE.van de RijtA.MiltsovA.KulkarniV.SkienaS. (2015). A paper ceiling explaining the persistent underrepresentation of women in printed news. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 960–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415596999
56.
SjovaagH. (2015). Hard news/soft news: The hierarchy of genres and the boundaries of the profession. In CarlsonM.LewisS. (Eds.), Shaping inquiry in culture, communication and media studies: Boundaries of journalism, professionalism practices and participation (pp. 101–117). Routledge.
57.
SteeleC. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60229-4
58.
ToffB.PalmerR. A. (2019). Explaining the gender gap in news avoidance: “News-is-for-men” perceptions and the burdens of caretaking. Journalism Studies, 20(11), 1563–1579.
59.
TrumboC. W.DunwoodyS.GriffinR. J. (1998). Journalists, cognition, and the presentation of an epidemiologic study. Science Communication, 19(3), 238–265.
60.
WangM. Y.ZhangP. Z.ZhouC. Y.LaiN. Y. (2019). Effect of emotion, expectation, and privacy on purchase intention in WeChat health product consumption: The mediating role of trust. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203861
61.
ZochL.TurkJ. (1998). Women making news: Gender as a variable in source selection and use. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 762–775.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
