This article tests whether the geographic diversity of editorial boards affects the diversity of research papers. Based on a content analysis of 84 journals listed in the Journal Citation Report, we show that diverse editorial boards are more likely to publish more diverse research articles, based on the country of origin of the first author and on where the data were collected. Our findings also indicate a negative association between (a) the impact factor and diversity of the research approach, (b) the journal’s affiliation to an academic association and diversity in the first author’s country of origin and the country of data collection, and (c) the founding year of the publication and the country of data collection. Finally, the founding year of the publication is explored as a moderator.
AlvessonM.GabrielY. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 245–263.
2.
AlvessonM.GabrielY.PaulsenR. (2017). Return to meaning: A social science with something to say. Oxford University Press.
3.
AmanR. (2016). Delinking from western epistemology: En route from university to pluriversity via interculturality. In GrosfoguelR.HernándezR.VelásquezR. E. (Eds.), Decolonizing the westernized university (pp. 95–115). Lexington Books.
4.
AngP. H.Knobloch-WesterwickS.AguadedI.Munoz-UribeJ.-F.WassermanH.AthiqueA. (2019). Intellectual balkanization or globalization: The future of communication research publishing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96: 963–99.
5.
BaerlocherM. O.NewtonM.GautamT.TomlinsonG.DetskyA. S. (2007). The meaning of author order in medical research. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 55, 174–180.
6.
BaruchY. (2001). Global or North American? A geographical based comparative analysis of publications in top management journals. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 109–126.
7.
BauderH.HannahC. A.LujanU. (2017). International experience in the academic field: Knowledge production, symbolic capital, and mobility fetishism. Population, Space and Place, 23, 1–13.
8.
BonitzM.BrucknerE.ScharnhorstA. (1999). The Matthew-index: Concentration patterns and Matthew core journals. Scientometrics, 44(3), 361–378.
9.
BraunT.DióspatonyiI. (2005). World flash on basic research: The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 62(3), 297–319.
10.
BurgessT.ShawN. (2010). Editorial board membership of management and business journals: A social network analysis study of the Financial Times 40. British Journal of Management, 21(3), 627–648.
CanagarajahS. A. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. University of Pittsburgh Press.
13.
CanaveroF.FranceschiniF.MaisanoD.MastrogiacomoG. (2014). Impact of journals and academic reputations of authors: A structured bibliometric survey of the IEEE publication galaxy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(1), 17–40. doi:10.1109/TPC.2013.2255935
14.
Chase-DunnC. (1999). Globalization: A world-systems perspective. Journal of World-Systems Research, 5(2), 198–215.
15.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
16.
DelgadoE.RepisoR. (2013). The impact of scientific journals of communication: Comparing Google Scholar Metrics, Web of Science and Scopus. Comunicar, 21(41), 45–52.
17.
DemeterM. (2018). Changing center and stagnant periphery in communication and media studies: National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication from 2013 to 2017. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2893–2921.
18.
De SantosB. (2007). Cognitive justice in a global world: Prudent knowledges for a decent life. Lexington Books.
19.
De SantosB. (2011). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
20.
De SantosB. (2016). The university at a crossroads. In GrosfoguelR.HernándezR.VelásquezR. E. (Eds.), Decolonizing the westernized university. pp. 295–302. Lexington Books.
21.
De SantosB. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire: The coming of age of epistemologies of the South. Duke University Press.
22.
DhananiA.JonesM. J. (2017). Editorial boards of accounting journals: Gender diversity and internationalisation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(5), 1008–1040.
23.
Du JianT. X. (2013). Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices. Scientometrics, 96(1), 277–295.
24.
Ferrer-SapenaA.Sánchez-PérezE.PesetF.GonzálezL. M.Aleixandre-BenaventR. (2016). The impact factor as a measuring tool of the prestige of the journals in research assessment in mathematics. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 306–314.
GaltungJ. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2), 81–117.
27.
GanterS. A.OrtegaF. (2019). The invisibility of Latin American scholarship in European media and communication studies: Challenges and opportunities of de-westernization and academic cosmopolitanism. International Journal of Communication, 13, 68–91.
28.
GoyanesM. (2017). Desafío a la investigación estándar en comunicación: Crítica y alternativas. Editorial de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
29.
GoyanesM. (2019). Editorial boards in communication sciences journals: Plurality or standardization?International Communication Gazette. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518825322
30.
HanitzschT. (2019). Journalism studies still needs to fix Western bias. Journalism, 20(1), 214–217.
31.
HillM. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2), 427–432.
32.
HolbertR. L.ParkE. (2019). Conceptualizing, organizing, and positing moderation in communication research. Communication Theory. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006
33.
KerrJ. (2014). Western epistemic dominance and colonial structures: Considerations for thought and practice in programs of teacher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 3(2), 83–104.
34.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
35.
LaufE. (2005). National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 139–151.
36.
LeeC. C. (2015). Internationalizing “international communication.”University of Michigan Press.
37.
MetzI.HarzingA. W. (2012). An update of gender diversity in editorial boards: A longitudinal study of management journals. Personnel Review, 41(3), 283–300.
38.
MetzI.HarzingA. W.ZyphurM. J. (2016). Of journal editors and editorial boards: Who are the trailblazers in increasing editorial board gender equality?British Journal of Management, 27(4), 712–726.
39.
MignoloW. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
40.
MignoloW. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press.
41.
MurphyJ.ZhuJ. (2012). Neo-colonialism in the academy? Anglo-American domination in management journals. Organization, 19(6), 915–927.
42.
ParkerL. D. (2007). Developing research journals and qualitative inquiry: The role of the editorial board. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 4(3), 168–182.
43.
PaulusF. M.RademacherL.SchäferT. A. J.Müller-PinzlerL.KrachS. (2015). Journal impact factor shapes scientists’ reward signal in the prospect of publication. PLOS ONE, 10(11), Article e0142537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142537
44.
RobinsonG.DechantK. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21–31.
45.
RosenstreichD.WooliscroftB. (2006). How international are the top academic journals? The case of marketing. European Business Review, 18(6), 422–436.
46.
SiverstenG. (2016). Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 107, 357–368.
47.
WaisbordS. (2015a). My vision for theJournal of Communication. Journal of Communication, 65, 585–588.
48.
WaisbordS. (2015b). Three challenges for communication and global social change. Communication Theory, 25, 144–165.
49.
WaisbordS. (2019). Communication: A post-discipline. Polity Press.
50.
WaisbordS.MelladoC. (2014). De-westernizing communication studies: A reassessment. Communication Theory, 24, 361–372.
51.
WallersteinI. (1991). Geopolitics and geoculture. Cambridge University Press.
52.
WallersteinI. (2004). World systems analysis: An introduction. Duke University Press.
53.
WangG. (2011). De-westernizing communication research: Altering questions and changing frameworks. Routledge.
54.
WiedemannT.MeyenM. (2016). Internationalization through Americanization: The expansion of the International Communication Association’s leadership to the world. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1489–1509.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
