AdlerN. J.HarzingA. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 72-95.
2.
AxfordB.PutnisP. (2002). Communication and media studies in Australian universities: Diverse, innovative, and isomorphic. Australian Journal of Communication, 29, 1-20.
3.
ChakravarttyP.KuoR.GrubbsV.McIlwainC. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68, 254-266. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy003
4.
ComaroffJ.ComaroffJ. L. (2012). Theory from the South: Or, how Euro-America is evolving toward Africa. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
5.
CraigR. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119-161. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
6.
CunninghamS.TurnbullS. (2014). The media and communications in Australia. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin Academic.
7.
CurranJ.ParkM.-J. (2000). De-Westernizing media studies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
8.
de GraafA.SandersJ.HoekenH. (2016). Characteristics of narrative interventions and health effects: A review of the content, form, and context of narratives in health-related narrative persuasion research. Review of Communication Research, 4, 88-131. doi:10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.011
9.
DemeterM. (2019). The winner takes it all: International inequality in communication and media studies today. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96, 37-59. doi:10.1177/1077699018792270
10.
DissanayakeW. (1988). Communication theory: The Asian perspective. Singapore: Asian Media, Information and Communication Centre.
11.
EnghelF.BecerraM. (2018). Here and there: (Re)situating Latin America in International Communication Theory. Communication Theory, 28, 111-130. doi:10.1093/ct/qty005
12.
Fernández-QuijadaD.MasipP. (2013). Tres décadas de investigación española en comunicación: hacia la mayoría de edad [Three decades of Spanish communication research: Towards legal age]. Comunicar, 21(41), 15-24. doi:10.3916/C41-2013-01
13.
GoonasekeraA.KuoE. C. Y. (2000). Foreword. In GoonasekeraA.KuoE. C. Y. (Eds.), Towards an Asian theory of communication? [Special issue]. Asian Journal of Communication, 10(2), vii-xii.
14.
HaenschenK. (2019). Self-reported versus digitally recorded: Measuring political activity on Facebook. Social Science Computer Review. doi: 10.1177/0894439318813586
15.
HoladayD.KuoE. C. (1993). Upsetting the agenda: Media and the 1991 Singapore election. Gazette, 51, 197-218. doi:10.1177/001654929305100302
16.
JacksonS. A. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
Jiménez-ContrerasE.FabaC.de Moya-AnegónF. (2001). El destino de las revistas científicas nacionales. El caso español a través de una muestra (1950-90) [Study of national scientific journals. The Spanish case (1950-90)]. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 24, 147-161. doi:10.3989/redc.2001.v24.i2.47
KincaidD. L. (1987). Communication theory from Eastern and Western perspectives. New York, NY: Praeger.
20.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.LiuL.HinoA.WesterwickA.JohnsonB. K. (2019). Context impacts on the confirmation bias: Evidence from the 2017 Japanese snap election compared with American and German findings. Human Communication Research. 0.1093/hcr/hqz005
21.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.WesterwickA. (in press). Mediated communication & you: An introduction to internet & media effects. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
KuoE. C.ChewH. E. (2009). Beyond ethnocentrism in communication theory: Towards a culture-centric approach. Asian Journal of Communication, 19, 422-437. doi:10.1080/01292980903293361
23.
LillisT.CurryM. J. (2013). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
24.
López-GarcíaX. (2010). La formación de los periodistas en el siglo XXI en Brasil, España, Portugal y Puerto Rico [The training of journalists in the 21st century in Brazil, Spain, Portugal and Puerto Rico]. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 65, 231-243. doi:10.4185/RLCS-65-2010-896-231-243
25.
MartínezM.SaperasE. (2011). La investigación sobre comunicación en España (1998-2007). Análisis de los artículos publicados en revistas científicas [Communication research in Spain (1998-2007). Analysis of articles published in scientific journals]. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 66, 101-129. doi:10.4185/RLCS-66-2011-926-101-129
26.
McQuailD.WindahlS. (2013). Communication models for the study of mass communication (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Routledge.
27.
Moragas-SpaM. (2013). Interpretar la comunicación. Estudios sobre medios en América y Europa [Interpreting communication. Media studies in America and Europe]. Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.
28.
PetersJ. D. (1986). Institutional Sources of Intellectual Poverty in Communication Research. Communication Research, 13, 527-559. doi:10.1177/009365086013004002
29.
PrinsA.CostasR.van LeeuwenT. N.WoutersP. F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25, 264-270.
30.
TurnerG. (2016). Reinventing the media. New York, NY: Routledge.
WaisbordS. (2019). Communication: A post-discipline. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
33.
WangG.ShenV. (2000). East, West, communication and theory: Searching for the meaning of searching for Asian communication theories. Asian Journal of Communication, 10, 14-32.
34.
WassermanH. (2009). Extending the theoretical cloth to make room for African experience: An interview with Francis Nyamnjoh. Journalism Studies, 10, 281-293.
35.
WiedemannT.MeyenM. (2016). Internationalization through Americanization: The expansion of the International Communication Association’s leadership to the world. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1489-1509.