This study examines how frequently committed ethical misconduct regarding values closely aligned to an organizational mission affects stakeholders’ pro-organizational responses to an offending nonprofit. Using a 2 × 2 experimental survey, findings showed that ethical misconduct in primary values resulted in significantly decreased positive attitudes toward and donation intentions to the organization. Also, the patterns of unethical behaviors significantly increased stakeholders’ negative attitudes toward the organization and willingness to assign the organization responsibility for unethical behavior. Perceived organizational responsibility for ethical misconduct and deteriorating organization–public relationships (OPRs) were significant mediators for the effects of primary ethical violations.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2.
AugerP.DevinneyT. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 361-383. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9287-y
3.
BakerS. (2008). The model of the principled advocate and the pathological partisan: A virtue ethics construct of opposing archetypes of public relations and advertising practitioners. Journal of Media Ethics, 23, 235-253. doi:10.1080/08900520802222050
4.
BaldwinM. W. (1997). Relational schemas as a source of if-then self-inference procedures. Review of General Psychology, 1, 326-335. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.4.326
5.
BasilD. Z.RidgwayN. M.BasilM. D. (2006). Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility. Psychology & Marketing, 23, 1035-1054. doi:10.1002/mar.20145
6.
BaucusM. S.BaucusD. A. (1997). Paying the piper: An empirical examination of longer-term financial consequences of illegal corporate behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 129-151. doi:10.2307/257023
7.
BivinsT. H. (2009). Mixed media: Moral distinctions in advertising, public relations, and journalism (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BlomgrenA. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility influence profit margins? A case study of executive perceptions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 263-274. doi:10.1002/csr.246
9.
BortreeD. S.WatersR. D. (2008). Admiring the organization: A study of the relational quality outcomes of the nonprofit organization-volunteer relationship. Public Relations Journal, 2(3), 1-17.
10.
BoulstridgeE.CarriganM. (2000). Do consumers really care about corporate responsibility? Highlighting the attitude-behaviour gap. Journal of Communication Management, 4, 355-368. doi:10.1108/eb023532
11.
BowenS. A. (2004). Expansion of ethics as the tenth generic principle of public relations excellence: A Kantian theory and model for managing ethical issues. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16, 65-92. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1601_3
12.
BowenS. A. (2005). A practical model for ethical decision making in issues management and public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 191-216. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_1
13.
BrawleyA. M.PuryC. L. S. (2016). Work experiences on MTurk: Job satisfaction, turnover, and information sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 531-546. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.031
14.
BroomG. M.CaseyS.RitcheyJ. (2009). Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9, 83-98. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0902_01
15.
BrownK. A.WhiteC. L. (2011). Organization-public relationships and crisis response strategies: Impact on attribution of responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23, 75-92. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2010.504792
16.
BrowningN. (2015). The ethics of two-way symmetry and the dilemmas of dialogic Kantianism. Journal of Media Ethics, 30, 3-18. doi:10.1080/08900523.2014.985295
17.
BrowningN.GogoO.KimmelM. (2018). Comprehending CSR messages: Applying the elaboration likelihood model. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23, 17-34. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-07-2017-0068
18.
BurgoonJ. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1-2), 30-48.
19.
BurgoonJ. K.HaleJ. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58-79.
20.
BurtonB. K.GoldsbyM. G. (2009). The moral floor: A philosophical examination of the connection between ethics and business. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 145-154. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0074-4
21.
CoombsW. T. (2004). Impact of past crises on current crisis communication: Insights from situational crisis communication theory. Journal of Business Communication, 41, 265-289. doi:10.1177/0021943604265607
22.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management, 10, 123-137. doi:10.1108/13632540610664698
23.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2015). CSR as crisis risk: Expanding how we conceptualize the relationship. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20, 144-162. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-10-2013-0078
24.
DavidsonD. K. (1990). On corporate reputation: A reply to Dobson. Business & Society, 29, 39-41. doi:10.1177/000765039002900105
25.
DawarN.LeiJ. (2009). Brand crises: The roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 62, 509-516.
26.
de PelsmackerP.DriesenL.RaypG. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39, 363-385. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00019.x
27.
DobsonJ. (1989). Corporate reputation: A free-market solution to unethical behavior. Business & Society, 28(1), 1-5. doi:10.1177/000765038902800101
28.
DunfeeT. W. (1998). The marketplace of morality: First steps toward a theory of moral choice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 127-145. doi:10.2307/3857525
29.
EaddyL. L.JinY. (2018). Crisis history tellers matter: The effects of crisis history and crisis information source on publics’ cognitive and affective responses to organizational crisis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23, 226-241. doi:10.1108/CCIJ-04-2017-0039
30.
EffronD. A.LucasB. J.O’ConnorK. (2015). Hypocrisy by association: When organizational membership increases condemnation for wrongdoing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 147-159. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.05.001
31.
ElvingW. J. L. (2013). Skepticism and corporate social responsibility communications: The influence of fit and reputation. Journal of Marketing Communications, 19, 277-292. doi:10.1080/13527266.2011.631569
32.
FergusonM. A. (1984, August). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for the Association of Education in Journalisms and Mass Communication, Gainesville, FL.
33.
GoE.BortreeD. S. (2017). What and how to communicate CSR? The role of CSR fit, modality interactivity, and message interactivity on social networking sites. Journal of Promotion Management, 23, 727-747. doi:10.1080/10496491.2017.1297983
34.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213-224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753
35.
GriffinM.BabinB. J.DardenW. R. (1992). Consumer assessments of responsibility for product-related injuries: The impact of regulations, warnings, and promotional policies. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 870-878.
36.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.Jr.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
HaraK.AdamsA.MillandK.SavageS.Callison-BurchC.BighamJ. P. (2018, April). A data-driven analysis of workers’ earnings on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Paper presented at the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
38.
HonL. C.GrunigJ. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations.
39.
HuL-t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
40.
HungC-J. F. (2005). Exploring types of organization–public relationships and their implications for relationship management in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 393-426. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1704_4
41.
JahdiK.AcikdilliG. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding?Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 103-113. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0113-1
42.
JinK. G.DrozdenkoR. G. (2010). Relationships among perceived organizational core values, corporate social responsibility, ethics, and organizational performance outcomes: An empirical study of information technology professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 341-359. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0158-1
43.
JinK. G.DrozdenkoR. G.DeLoughyS. (2013). The role of corporate value clusters in ethics, social responsibility, and performance: A study of financial professionals and implications for the financial meltdown. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 15-24. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1227-4
44.
KangM.ParkY. E. (2017). Exploring trust and distrust as conceptually and empirically distinct constructs: Association with symmetrical communication and public engagement across four pairings of trust and distrust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29, 114-135. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2017.1337579
45.
KangM.YangS.-U. (2010). Mediation effects of organization–public relationship outcomes on public intentions for organizational supports. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22, 477-494. doi:10.1080/10627261003601614
46.
KarnaniA. (2011). “Doing well by doing good”: The grand illusion. California Management Review, 53, 69-86. doi:10.1525/cmr.2011.53.2.69
47.
KarpoffJ. M.LeeD. S.MartinG. S. (2008). The cost to firms of cooking the books. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43, 581-611. doi:10.1017/S0022109000004221
48.
KeesJ.BerryC.BurtonS.SheehanK. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46, 141-155. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
49.
KelleyH. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In LevineD. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192-241). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
50.
KelleyH. H.MichelaJ. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325
51.
KentM. L.TaylorM. (2016). From homo economicus to homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42, 60-67. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003
52.
KiE.-J.HonL. C. (2007). Reliability and validity of organization-public relationship measurement and linkages among relationship indicators in a membership organization. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 419-438. doi:10.1177/107769900708400302
53.
KimJ. (2017). Elaborating the halo effect of SCCT: How and why performance history affects crisis responsibility and organizational reputation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29, 277-294. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2017.1405812
54.
LaffertyB. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a cause–brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60, 447-453. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.030
Lin-HiN.HörischJ.BlumbergI. (2015). Does CSR matter for nonprofit organizations? Testing the link between CSR performance and trustworthiness in the nonprofit versus for-profit domain. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26, 1944-1974. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-9506-6
57.
MacKenzieS. B.LutzR. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65. doi:10.2307/1251413
58.
MackeyS. (2014). Virtue ethics, CSR and “corporate citizenship.”Journal of Communication Management, 18, 131-145. doi:10.1108/JCOM-11-2012-0084
59.
MasonW.SuriS. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1-23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
60.
MazutisD. D.SlawinskiN. (2015). Reconnecting business and society: Perceptions of authenticity in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 137-150. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2253-1
61.
McArthurL. A. (1972). The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171-193. doi:10.1037/h0032602
62.
McAuleyE.DuncanT. E.RussellD. W. (1992). Measuring causal attributions: The revised causal dimension scale (CDSII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 566-573. doi:10.1177/0146167292185006
63.
MurphyP. E.LaczniakG. R.WoodG. (2007). An ethical basis for relationship marketing: A virtue ethics perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 41(1/2), 37-57. doi:10.1108/03090560710718102
64.
PelozaJ.ShangJ. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 117-135. doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0213-6
65.
PerriD. F. (2015). Teaching business ethics: Acknowledging the seductive nature of unethical behavior. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 16, 353-365.
66.
ReuberA. R.FischerE. (2010). Organizations behaving badly: When are discreditable actions likely to damage organizational reputation?Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 39-50. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0180-3
67.
RichterU. H. (2010). Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 625-649. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0529-7
68.
RimH.KimS. (2016). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) skepticism and their impacts on public evaluations toward CSR. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28, 248-267. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2016.1261702
69.
RimH.YangS.-U.LeeJ. (2016). Strategic partnerships with nonprofits in corporate social responsibility (CSR): The mediating role of perceived altruism and organizational identification. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3213-3219. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.035
70.
RobertsonT. S.RossiterJ. R. (1974). Children and commercial persuasion: An attribution theory analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 13-20. doi:10.1086/208577
71.
SabadozC. (2011). Between profit-seeking and prosociality: Corporate social responsibility as Derridean supplement. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 77-91. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0890-1
72.
SethiS. P. (1994). Imperfect markets: Business ethics as an easy virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 803-815. doi:10.1007/BF00876261
73.
ShenH. (2017). Refining organization–public relationship quality measurement in student and employee samples. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 994-1010. doi:10.1177/1077699016674186
74.
SiomkosG. J.KurzbardG. (1994). The hidden crisis in product-harm crisis management. European Journal of Marketing, 28(2), 30-41.
75.
SjovallA. M.TalkA. C. (2004). From actions to impressions: Cognitive attribution theory and the formation of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 7, 269-281. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540225
76.
SohnY. J.LariscyR. W. (2015). A “buffer” or “boomerang?”—The role of corporate reputation in bad times. Communication Research, 42, 237-259. doi:10.1177/0093650212466891
77.
SweetserK. D.BrowningN. (2017). Credibility or credulity? Examining political organization-public relationships in an election of interloping candidates. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29, 200-218. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2017.1388240
78.
TreviñoL. K.NelsonK. N. (2014). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
79.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Summary population and housing characteristics: 2010 (CPH-1). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
80.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Income and poverty in the United States (P60-263). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
81.
WatersR. D. (2008). Applying relationship management theory to the fundraising process for individual donors. Journal of Communication Management, 12, 73-87. doi:10.1108/13632540810854244
82.
WatersR. D. (2011). Increasing fundraising efficiency through evaluation: Applying communication theory to the nonprofit organization–donor relationship. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 458-475. doi:10.1177/0899764009354322
83.
WyattW. N. (2008). Being Aristotelian: Using virtue ethics in an applied media ethics course. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 23, 296-307. doi:10.1080/08900520802519836
84.
ZavyalovaA.PfarrerM. D.RegerR. K.HubbardT. D. (2015). Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 253-276. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0611
