AnaO.LópezL.MunguíaE. (2010). Framing peace as violence television news depictions of the 2007 police attack on immigrant rights marchers in Los Angeles. Aztlan: A Journal of Chicano Studies, 35, 69-101.
2.
AndersonB. (2003). Visual framing: A study in face-ism from the websites for the 108th United States Congress (Unpublished master’s thesis). East Tennessee State University, Johnson City.
3.
ArugueteN.CalvoE. (2018). Time to #protest: Selective exposure, cascading activation, and framing in social media. Journal of Communication, 68, 480-502.
4.
BadenC.Tenenboim-WeinblattK. (2018). Viewpoint, testimony, action: How journalists reposition source frames within news frames. Journalism Studies, 19, 143-161.
5.
BarryA. M. (1997). Visual intelligence: Perception, image, and manipulation in visual communication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
6.
BatesonG. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution and epistemology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
BatziouA. (2014). Framing “otherness” in press photographs: The case of immigrants in Greece and Spain. Journal of Media Practice, 12, 41-60.
8.
BennettW. L.IyengarS. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707-731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
9.
BennettW. L.SegerbergA. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BlumlerJ. G. (2015). Core theories of political communication: Foundational and freshly minted. Communication Theory, 25, 426-438.
11.
BorahP. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61, 246-263. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
12.
Boromisza-HabashiD. (2013). Which way is forward with communication theorizing: A conversation with Robert T. Craig. Communication Theory, 23, 417-432.
13.
BruceM. D. (2014). Framing Arab Spring conflict: A visual analysis of coverage on five transnational Arab news channels. Journal of Middle East Media, 10, 1-26.
14.
BrüggemannM. (2014). Between frame-setting and frame-sending: How journalists contribute to news frames. Communication Theory, 24, 61-82.
15.
BrüggemannM.D’AngeloP. (2018). Defragmenting news framing research: Reconciling generic and issue-specific frames. In D’AngeloP. (Ed.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 90-111). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
CacciatoreM. A.ScheufeleD. A.IyengarS. (2016). The end of framing as we know it and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7-23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
17.
CarrageeK. M. (1990). Interpretive media study and interpretive social science. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 81-96.
18.
CarrageeK. M. (1996). Critical ethnographies and the concept of resistance. In MorganM.LeggettS. (Eds.), Mainstream(s) and margins: Cultural politics in the 90s (pp. 126-142). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
19.
CarrageeK. M.RoefsW. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54, 214-233.
20.
CheregiB.-F.AdiA. (2015). The visual framing of Romanian migrants in the national press: A social semiotic approach. Revista Romana de Jurnalism si Comunicare, 10(2), 12-24.
21.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
22.
ColemanR. (2010). Framing the pictures in our heads: Exploring the framing and agenda-setting effects of visual images. In D’AngeloP.KuypersJ. A. (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 233-261). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
ColemanR.MajorL. H. (2014). Ethical health communication: A content analysis of predominant frames and primes in public service announcements. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29, 91-107.
24.
DahmenN. S. (2012). Photographic framing in the stem cell debate: Integrating eye-tracking data for a new dimension of media effects research. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 189-203.
25.
DanV. (2018). A methodological approach for integrative framing analysis of television news. In D’AngeloP. (Ed.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 191-220). New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
D’AngeloP. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52, 870-888.
27.
D’AngeloP. (Ed.). (2018). Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
D’AngeloP.KuypersJ. A. (Eds.). (2010). Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
D’AngeloP.ShawD. (2018). Journalism as framing. In VosT. P. (Ed.), Handbooks of communication science: Journalism (Vol. 19, pp. 205-233). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
30.
DickinsonG. (2006). The Pleasantville effect: Nostalgia and the visual framing of (White) suburbia. Western Journal of Communication, 70, 212-233.
31.
DobernigK.LobingerK. (2016). Covering conflict: Differences in visual and verbal news coverage of the Gaza crisis 2009 in four weekly news media. Journal of Visual Literacy, 29, 88-105.
32.
EntmanR. E. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
33.
Entman (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20, 415–432.
34.
EntmanR. E.MatthesJ.PellicanoL. (2009). Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In Wahl-JorgensenK.HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 175-190). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
EntmanR. E.UsherN. (2018). Framing in a fractured democracy: Impacts of digital technology on ideology, power, and cascading network activation. Journal of Communication, 68, 298-308.
36.
FryeN. (1990). Myth and metaphor: Selected essays, 1974-1988. Charlottesville: The University of Virginia Press.
37.
Garcia-RetameroR.GalesicM. (2010). How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 1323-1329.
38.
GeiseS.BadenC. (2014). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25, 46-69.
39.
GitlinT. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media and the making an unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: Essays on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
41.
González-BailónS. (2017). Decoding the social world: Data science and the unintended consequences of communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
42.
GrabeM. E.BucyE. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
GreenbergJ. (2002). Framing and temporality in political cartoons: A critical analysis of visual news discourse. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 39, 181-198.
44.
GuggenheimL.JangS. M.BaeS. Y.NeumanW. R. (2015). Big media, big data and the politics of issue framing. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659, 207-224.
45.
HallS. (1982). The rediscovery of “ideology” return of the repressed in media studies. In BennettT.CurranJ.GurevitchM.WollacottJ. (Eds.), Culture, society and media (pp. 52-86). London, England: Routledge.
46.
IyengarS. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
47.
IyerA.OldmeadowJ. (2006). Picture this: Emotional and political responses to photographs of the Kenneth Bigley kidnapping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 635-647.
48.
KinderD.SandersL. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
49.
KrippendorffK. (2017). Three concepts to retire. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 92-99.
50.
LechelerS.de VreeseC. H. (2018). News framing effects. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
LevinI. P.SchneiderS. L.GaethG. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
52.
MatthesJ.KohringM. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58, 258-279.
53.
MorleyD. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. London, England: Routledge.
54.
NeumanW. R. (2016). The digital difference: Media technology and the theory of communication effects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
NeumanW. R.GuggenheimL. (2011). The evolution of media effects theory: A six-stage model of cumulative research. Communication Theory, 21, 169-196.
56.
NewhagenJ. E.ReevesB. (1992). This evening’s bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 25-41.
57.
NietzscheF. (2005). On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense. In CarmanT. (Ed. & Trans.), On truth and untruth: Selected writings (pp. 15-50). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
58.
NisbetM. C. (2010). Framing science: A new paradigm in public engagement. In KahlorL.StoutP. A. (Eds.), Communicating science: New agendas in communication (pp. 41-67). New York, NY: Routledge.
59.
O’NeillS. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian Newspapers. Geoforum, 49, 10-19.
60.
PostmanN. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death. New York, NY: Viking.
61.
PowellT. E.BoomgaardenH. G.De SwertK.de VreeseC. H. (2015). A clearer picture: The contribution of visuals and text to framing effects. Journal of Communication, 65, 997-1017.
62.
QinJ. (2015). Hero on Twitter, traitor on news: How social media and legacy news frame Snowden. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20, 166-184.
63.
ReeseS. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57, 148-154.
64.
RodriguezL.DimitrovaD. V. (2011). The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30, 48-65.
65.
RyanC.JeffreysK. (2012). Challenging domestic violence: Trickle-up theorizing about participation and power in communication activism. In FreyL. R.CarrageeK. M. (Eds.), Communication activism: Struggling for social justice amidst difference (pp. 179-222). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
66.
ScheufeleD. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122.
67.
ScheufeleD. A.IyengarS. (2017). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In KenskiK.JamiesonK. H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68.
ScheufeleD. A.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20.
SchwalbeC. B.DoughertyS. M. (2015). Visual coverage of the 2006 Lebanon War: Framing conflict in three US news magazines. Media, War & Conflict, 8, 141-162.
71.
SeoK.DillardJ. P.ShenF. (2013). The effects of message framing and visual image on persuasion. Communication Quarterly, 61, 564-583.
72.
ShahD. V.CappellaJ. N.NeumanW. R. (Eds.). (2015). Toward computational social science: Exploiting big data in the digital age. Philadelphia PA: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
73.
ShahD. V.WattsM. D.DomkeD.FanD. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339-370. doi:10.1086/341396
74.
SnidermanP. M.TheriaultS. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In SarisW. E.SnidermanP. M. (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 133-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75.
SontagS. (2001). Illness as metaphor and AIDS and its metaphors. New York, NY: Picador.
76.
TuchmanG. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York, NY: The Free Press.
77.
VliegenthartR.van ZoonenL. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26, 101-115.
78.
ZallerJ.FeldmanS. (1992). A simple theory of survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579-616.