Drawing on the 2012 American National Election Studies (ANES) panel data, this study explores the influence of the consumption of partisan information sources on affective polarization and investigates the mechanism underlying this relationship. The results show that exposure to pro-party television sources strengthens affective polarization among partisans. The polarizing effects of pro-party sources are mediated by the discrete negative emotions (i.e., anger and fear) toward presidential candidates. The study discusses the impact of selective exposure on deliberative and participatory democracies.
AbelsonR. (1995). Attitude extremity. In PettyR.KrosnickJ. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 25-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
ArceneauxK.JohnsonM. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels: Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
3.
BatraR. (1986). Affective advertising: Role, processes, and measurement. In PetersonR.HoyerW.WilsonW. (Eds.), The role of affect in consumer behavior: Emerging theories and application (pp. 53-86). Lexington, MA: Heath.
4.
BaumM.GroelingT. (2008). New media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25, 345-365. doi:10.1080/10584600802426965
5.
BilligM.TajfelH. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27-52. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420030103
6.
BraderT. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388-405. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x
7.
CarverC. S.Harmon-JonesE. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological bulletin, 135(2), 183-204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965
ChoJ.ChoyS. P. (2011). From podium to living room: Elite debates as an emotional catalyst for citizen communicative engagements. Communication Research, 38, 778-804. doi:10.1177/0093650210378518
10.
CloreG. L.OrtonyA. (2000). Cognition in emotion: Always, sometimes, or never? In LaneR. D.NadelL. (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 24-61). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
DillardJ. P.PeckE. (2001). Persuasion and the structure of affect: Dual systems and discrete emotions as complementary models. Human Communication Research, 27, 38-68. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00775.x
12.
DilliplaneD. (2011). All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 287-316. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr006
FinkelS. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
FioreA. M.KimJ. (2007). An integrative framework capturing experiential and utilitarian shopping experience. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35, 421-442. doi:10.1108/09590550710750313
16.
FrijdaN. H.MansteadA. S. R.BemS. (2000). Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.AnastasioP. A.BachmanB. A.RustM. C. (1993). The common in-group identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 1-26. doi:10.1080/14792779343000004
18.
GarrettR. K.GvirsmanS. D.JohnsonB. K.TsfatiY.NeoR.DalA. (2014). Implications of pro- and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40, 309-332. doi:10.1111/hcre.12028
GutmannA.ThompsonD. (2010). The mindsets of political compromise. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 1125-1143. doi:10.1017/S1537592710003270
21.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
22.
HasellA.WeeksB. E. (2016). Partisan provocation: The role of partisan news use and emotional responses in political information sharing in social media. Human Communication Research, 42, 641-661. doi:10.1111/hcre.12092
23.
HatfieldE.CacioppoJ.RapsonR. L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In ClarkM. S. (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior (pp. 155-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
HatfieldE.CacioppoJ.RapsonR. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 96-100. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
26.
HmielowskiJ. D.BeamM. A.HutchensM. J. (2016). Structural changes in media and attitude polarization: Examining the contributions of TV news before and after the Telecommunications Act of 1996. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28, 153-172. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv012
27.
HolbrookM. B. (1986). Emotions in the consumption experience: Toward a new model of consumer behavior. In PetersonR.HoyerW.WilsonW. (Eds.), The role of affect in consumer behavior: Emerging theories and application (pp. 17-52). Lexington, MA: Heath.
28.
HyunK. D.MoonS. J. (2016). Agenda setting in the partisan TV news context: Attribute agenda setting and polarized evaluation of presidential candidates among viewers of NBC, CNN, and FOX news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 509-529. doi:10.1177/1077699016628820
29.
IyengarS.HahnK. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
30.
IyengarS.SoodG.LelkesY. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 405-431. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038
31.
IyengarS.WestwoodS. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690-707. doi:10.1111/ajps.12152
32.
JacobsonG. C. (2015). Partisan media and electoral polarization in 2012: Evidence from the American national election study. In ThurberJ.YoshinakaA. (Eds.), American gridlock: The sources, character, and impact of political polarization (pp. 259-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
JamiesonK. H.CappellaJ. N. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
JamiesonK. H.HardyB.RomerD. (2007). The effectiveness of the press in serving the needs of American democracy. In The American Democracy Project (Ed.), A republic divided (pp. 21-51). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
KeltnerD.EllsworthP. C.EdwardsK. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740-752. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.740
36.
KimN. (2016). Beyond rationality: The role of anger and information in deliberation. Communication Research, 43, 3-24. doi:10.1177/0093650213510943
37.
KlapperJ. (1960). The effects of mass media. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
38.
Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2014). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
LaddJ. M.LenzG. S. (2008). Reassessing the role of anxiety in vote choice. Political Psychology, 29, 275-296. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00626.x
40.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M.HorowitzJ. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83-110. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138
41.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
LernerJ. S.GoldbergJ. H.TetlockP. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563-574. doi:10.1177/0146167298246001
43.
LernerJ. S.GonzalesR. M.SmallD. A.FischhoffB. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144-150. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01433
44.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473-493. doi:10.1080/026999300402763
45.
LernerJ. S.KeltnerD. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146-159. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
46.
LevenduskyM. (2013). Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication, 30, 565-581. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737435
47.
MackieD. M.WorthL. T.AsuncionA. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 812-822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.812
48.
MacKuenM.WolakJ.KeeleL.MarcusG. E. (2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 440-458. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x
49.
MarcusG. E. (1988). The structure of emotional response: 1984 presidential candidate. American Political Science Review, 82, 737-761. doi:10.2307/1962488
50.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. B. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
51.
MasonL. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 128-145. doi:10.1111/ajps.12089
52.
McGuireW. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-346). New York, NY: Random House.
53.
MoorsA. (2010). Automatic constructive appraisal as a candidate cause of emotion. Emotion Review, 2, 139-156. doi:10.1177/1754073909351755
54.
MullainathanS.ShleiferA. (2005). The market for news. American Economic Review, 95, 1031-1053. doi:10.1257/0002828054825619
55.
MyersT. A. (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 297-310. doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.624490
56.
NabiR. L. (2002). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs, 69, 204-216. doi:10.1080/03637750216541
57.
NabiR. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9, 292-320. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
58.
NabiR. L. (2010). The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs, 77, 153-159. doi:10.1080/03637751003790444
59.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
60.
PriorM. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813-838. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
62.
SmithE. R.MackieD. M. (2008). Intergroup emotions. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 428-439). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
63.
SmithG.SearlesK. (2014). Who let the (attack) dogs out? New evidence for partisan media effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 71-99. doi:10.1093/poq/nft082
64.
SobierajS.BerryJ. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19-41. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
65.
SongH. (2017). Why do people (sometimes) become selective about news? The role of emotions and partisan differences in selective approach and avoidance. Mass Communication and Society, 20(1), 47-67. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1187755
66.
StroudN. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556-576. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x
67.
StroudN. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68.
StroudN. J.MuddimanA.LeeJ. K. (2014). Seeing media as group members: An evaluation of partisan bias perception. Journal of Communication, 64, 874-894. doi:10.1111/jcom.12110
69.
SunsteinC. R. (2001). Republica.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70.
TajfelH. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Differential between social groups (pp. 27-60). London, England: Academic Press.
71.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
72.
ValentinoN. A.BraderT.GroenendykE. W.GregorowiczK.HutchingsV. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73, 156-170. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000939
73.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR.LeachC. (2008). Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: Does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage?British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 353-372. doi:10.1348/014466607X231091
74.
VasilopoulosP.MarcusG. E.FoucaultM. (2018). Emotional responses to the Charlie Hebdo attacks: Addressing the authoritarianism puzzle. Political Psychology, 39(3), 557-575. doi:10.1111/pops.12439
75.
WojcieszakM.BimberB.FeldmanL.StroudN. J. (2016). Partisan news and political participation: Exploring mediated relationships. Political Communication, 33(2), 241-260. doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1051608
76.
WoodJ. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231-248. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231
