This comparative case study of two community news organizations takes a Resource Dependence approach in assessing impact of audience metrics on news decisions, and on mechanisms underlying these decisions. Findings show that the organization that more strongly emphasizes metrics publishes fewer in-depth civic-issue stories, and metrics are more likely to influence newsworthiness. However, reporters’ expertise with strategies for increasing numbers may actually free reporters for enterprise work. Findings also suggest effects from community size.
AbbottA. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
Alliance for Audited Media. (2018, June1). Audited reports. Available from auditedmedia.com
3.
AndersonC. W. (2011). Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local U.S. newsrooms. Journalism, 12, 550-566. doi:10.1177/1464884911402451
4.
BoczkowskiP. J.PeerL. (2011). The choice gap: The divergent online news preferences of journalists and consumers. Journal of Communication, 61, 857-876. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01582.x
5.
BunceM. (2017). Management and resistance in the digital newsroom. Journalism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1464884916688963
6.
CookT. E. (2005). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
Ferrer-ConillR. (2017). Quantifying journalism? A study on the use of data and gamification to motivate journalists. Television & New Media, 18, 706-720.
9.
Ferrer-ConillR.TandocE. C. (2018). The audience-oriented editor: Making sense of the audience in the newsroom. Digital Journalism, 6, 436-453.
10.
FroelichK. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246-268.
11.
GansH. (2004). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time (25th anniversary ed.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
12.
GuthD. (2015). Amber waves of change: Rural community journalism in areas of declining population. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 4, 259-275. doi:10.1386/ajms.4.2.259_1
13.
HanuschF.TandocE. C. (2017). Comments, analytics, and social media: The impact of audience feedback on journalists’ market orientation. Journalism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1464884917720305
14.
HatcherJ.HaavikE. (2014). “We write with our hearts”: How community identity shapes Norwegian community journalists’ news values. Journalism Practice, 8, 149-163.
15.
HindmanD.ErnstS.RichardsonM. (2001). The rural-urban gap in community newspaper editors’ use of information technologies. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 149-164.
16.
HindmanM. (2017). Journalism ethics and digital audience data. In BoczkowskiP. J.AndersonC. W. (Eds.), Remaking the news: Essays on the future of journalism scholarship in the digital age (pp. 177-194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
JennerM.TandocE. C. (2013, November14). Newsroom using web metrics to evaluate staff, guide editorial decisions. Reynolds Journalism Institute. Available from http://www.rjionline.org
18.
LeeA. M.LewisS. C.PowersM. (2014). Audience clicks and news placement: A study of time-lagged influence in online journalism. Communication Research, 41, 505-530. doi:10.1177/0093650212467031
19.
LewisS. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 836-866. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150
20.
LowreyW. (2009). Institutional roadblocks: Assessing journalism’s response to changing audiences. In PapacharissiZ. (Ed.), Journalism and citizenship: New agendas (pp. 44-67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
LowreyW.WooC. W. (2010). The news organization in uncertain times: Business or institution?Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 41-61.
22.
MacGregorP. (2013, September). Rational reflections: An illustrative examination of news web sites in two countries as workers reach towards digitally mediated changes. First Monday, 18(9). doi:10.5210/fm.v18i9.4621
23.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A. (1993). Organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
24.
McKenzieC.LowreyW.HaysH.ChungJ. C.WooC. W. (2011). Listening to news audiences: The impact of community structure and economic factors. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 375-395.
25.
MillerC.RainieL.PurcellK.MitchellA.RosenstielT. (2012). A closer look: How people get local news and information in different communities. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
26.
MitchellG. E. (2014). Strategic responses to resource dependence among transnational NGOs registered in the United States. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25, 67-91.
27.
NahS. (2010). Media publicity and civil society: Nonprofit organizations, local newspapers and the internet in a mid-western community. Mass Communication & Society, 13, 3-29.
28.
NahS.ArmstrongC. L. (2011). Structural pluralism in journalism and media studies: A concept explication and theory construction. Mass Communication & Society, 14, 857-878.
29.
NapoliP. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
30.
PetreC. (2015). The traffic factories: Metrics at Chartbeat, Gawker Media, and The New York Times. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. doi:10.7916/D80293W1
31.
PetreC. (2018). Engineering consent: How the design and marketing of newsroom analytics tools rationalize journalists’ labor. Digital Journalism, 6, 509-527.
32.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1978)
33.
PicardR. (2011). The economics and financing of media companies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
34.
ReaderB. (2018). Despite losses, community newspapers still dominate the U.S. market. Newspaper Research Journal, 39, 32-41.
35.
ReinemannC.StanyerJ.ScherrS.LegnanteG. (2012). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 221-239. doi:10.1177/1464884911427803
36.
SchlesingerP.DoyleG. (2015). From organizational crisis to multi-platform salvation? Creative destruction and the recomposition of news media. Journalism, 16, 305-323. doi:10.1177/1464884914530223
37.
ShirodkarV.MohrT. (2015). Explaining foreign firms’ approaches to corporate political activity in emerging economies: The effects of resource criticality, product diversification, inter-subsidiary integration, and business ties. International Business Review, 24, 567-579.
38.
StarrP. (1987). The sociology of official statistics. In AlonsoW.StarrP. (Eds.), The politics of numbers (pp. 7-57). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
SumpterR. (2000). Daily newspaper editors’ audience construction routines: A case study. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 17, 334-346.
40.
TandocE. C. (2014a). Journalism is twerking? How web analytics is changing the process of gatekeeping. New Media & Society, 16, 559-575. doi:10.1177/1461444814530541
41.
TandocE. C. (2014b). Audiences, journalists, and forms of capital in the online journalistic field. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 16(3), 23-33.
42.
TandocE. C.ThomasR. J. (2015). The ethics of web analytics. Digital Journalism, 3, 243-258.
43.
TenenboimO.CohenA. A. (2015). What prompts users to click and comment: A longitudinal analysis of online news. Journalism, 16, 198-217.
44.
TichenorP.DonohueG.OlienC. (1980). Community conflict & the press. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
45.
TuchmanG. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 660-679.
46.
UsherN. (2013). Al Jazeera English online. Digital Journalism, 1, 335-351.
47.
VuH. T. (2014). The online audience as gatekeeper: The influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection. Journalism, 15, 1094-1110. doi:10.1177/1464884913504259
48.
WelbersK.van AtteveldtW.KleinnijenhuisJ.RuigrokN.SchaperJ. (2016). News selection in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism, 17, 1037-1053.
49.
WryT.CobbJ. A.AldrichH. E. (2013). Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 441-488.
50.
YangM. J.ChyiH. I. (2011). Competing with whom? Where? And why (not)? An empirical study of U.S. online newspapers’ competition dynamics. Journal of Media Business Studies, 8(4), 59-74.
51.
YinR. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52.
ZamithR. (2015). Editorial judgment in an age of data: How audience analytics and metrics are influencing the placement of news products (Doctoral dissertation). Available from conservancy.umn.edu
53.
ZamithR. (2018a). On metrics-driven homepages: Assessing the relationship between popularity and prominence. Journalism Studies, 19, 1116-1137. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1262215
54.
ZamithR. (2018b). Quantified audiences in news production. Digital Journalism, 6, 418-435. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1444999
