Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-6
Effects of Issue Involvement,News Attention,Perceived Knowledge,and Perceived Influence of Anti-Corruption News on Chinese Students’ Political Participation
Informed by the third-person effect hypothesis, this study used a survey of 1,060 Chinese university students to analyze the impact of anti-corruption news on Chinese audiences’ attitudes and political participation. This study found that university students tended to think the influence of anti-corruption news on others was greater than on themselves. In addition, issue involvement and new media attention to such news were found to reduce the self-other perceptual gap. Furthermore, the perceived effects of such news on self were positively associated with supportive attitude toward the anti-corruption policies. Meanwhile, perceived effects on others were negatively related to respondents’ political participation.
AldooryL.Van DykeM. A. (2006). The roles of perceived “shared” involvement and information overload in understanding how audiences make meaning of news about bioterrorism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 346-361.
AtwoodL. E. (1994). Illusions of media power: The third-person effect. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71, 269-281.
4.
BanningS. A. (2006). Third-person effects on political participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 785-800.
5.
BarghJ. A. (2002). Losing consciousness: Automatic influences on consumer judgment, behavior, and motivation. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 280-285.
6.
BennurZ. (2008). Behavioral consequences of the third-person effect on Turkish voters (Doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
7.
BhattacherjeeA.SanfordC. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, 30, 805-825.
8.
BrownJ. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353-376.
9.
ChaffeeS. H.SchleuderJ. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76-107.
10.
ChaffeeS. H.ZhaoX.LeshnerG. (1994). Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research, 21, 305-324.
11.
ChangJ.RenH. (2018). The powerful image and the imagination of power: The “new visual turn” of the CPC’s propaganda strategy since its 18th National Congress in 2012. Asian Journal of Communication, 28(1), 1-19.
12.
ChungM.MunnoG. J.MoritzB. (2015). Triggering participation: Exploring the effects of third-person and hostile media perceptions on online participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 452-461.
13.
DavisonW. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1-15.
14.
DrewD.WeaverD. (2006). Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 25-42.
15.
DriscollP. D.SalwenM. B. (1997). Self-perceived knowledge of the OJ Simpson trial: Third-person perception and perceptions of guilt. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 541-556.
16.
EsareyA.StockmannD.ZhangJ. (2017). Support for Propaganda: Chinese perceptions of public service advertising. Journal of Contemporary China, 26, 101-117.
17.
FloraJ. A.MaibachE. W. (1990). Cognitive responses to AIDS information: The effects of issue involvement and message appeal. Communication Research, 17, 759-774.
18.
GolanG. J.DayA. G. (2008). The first-person effect and its behavioral consequences: A new trend in the twenty-five year history of third-person effect research. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 539-556.
19.
GuntherA. C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 45, 27-38.
20.
GuntherA. C.MundyP. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58-67.
HuY. W. (1997, June). The third-person effect in election news. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Chinese Communication Association, Taipei, Taiwan.
24.
HualingF. (2014). Wielding the sword: President Xi’s new anti-corruption campaign. In Rose-AckermanS.LagunesP. F. (Eds.), Greed, corruption, and the modern state: Essays in political economy (pp. 134-157). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
25.
HuhJ. (2003). Perceived effects, mediating influences, and behavioral outcomes of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising: Applying the third-person effect framework (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Advertising and Public Relations, University of Georgia, Athens.
26.
KolbitschJ.MaurerH. (2006). The transformation of the web: How emerging communities shape the information we consume. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12, 187-213.
27.
KushinM. J.YamamotoM. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 608-630.
28.
LeeE. J.TandocE. C. (2017). When news meets the audience: How audience feedback online affects news production and consumption. Human Communication Research, 43, 436-449.
29.
LeeF. L. (2009). The prevention effect of third-person perception: A study on the perceived and actual influence of polls. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 87-110.
30.
LiH.GongT.XiaoH. (2015). The perception of anti-corruption efficacy in China: An empirical analysis. Social Indicators Research, 120, 1-19.
31.
LiX. (2014). Tracing proceeds of corruption in China. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17, 376-378.
32.
LiX. G. (2016). Emerging media: Uses and dynamics. New York: Routledge.
33.
LiuX.LoV. H. (2014). Media exposure, perceived personal impact, and third-person effect. Media Psychology, 17, 378-396.
34.
LoV. H.ChangC. (2006). Knowledge about the Gulf Wars: A Theoretical model of learning from the News. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11, 135-155.
35.
LoV. H.ChengX. X. (2012). Perception of media influence and support for Internet censorship: Third-person effect of news about Google pulling out of China. Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society, 23, 66-95.
36.
LoV. H.PaddonA. (2001). Third-person effect, gender differences, pornography exposure and support for restriction of pornography. Asian Journal of Communication, 11, 120-142.
37.
LoV. H.WeiR. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the lnternet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 13-33.
38.
LoV. H.WeiR.LuH. Y.HouH. Y. (2015). Perceived issue importance, information processing, and third-person effect of news about the imported US beef controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(3), 1-20.
39.
LovejoyJ.RiffeD.ChengH. (2012). Campaign interest and issue knowledge: Did the media and negative political advertising—Matter in “Battleground Ohio”?Atlantic Journal of Communication, 20, 201-220.
40.
McLeodD. M.EvelandW. P.NathansonA. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153-174.
41.
McLeodJ. M.DailyK.GuoZ.EvelandW. P.Jr.BayerJ.YangS.WangH. (1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23, 179-209.
42.
MeirickP. C. (2005). Rethinking the target corollary the effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 32, 822-843.
43.
MutzD. C. (1989). The influence of perceptions of media influence: Third person effects and the public expression of opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1, 3-23.
44.
OhY. W. (2011, September). Willingness to speak out: Comparison between online versus offline communication. Symposium conducted at the 64th Annual Convention of the World Association for Public Opinion Research Amsterdam, Holland.
45.
PaekH. J.PanZ.SunY.AbisaidJ.HoudenD. (2005). The third-person perception as social judgment: An exploration of social distance and uncertainty in perceived effects of political attack ads. Communication Research, 32, 143-170.
46.
PaulB.SalwenM. B.DupagneM. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 57-85.
47.
PerloffR. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236-262.
48.
PerloffR. M. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983–1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184.
49.
PerloffR. M. (1999). The third person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1, 353-378.
50.
PerloffR. M. (2010). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
52.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1981). Issue involvement as a moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 20-24.
53.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
PriceV.HuangL. N.TewksburyD. (1997). Third-person effects of news coverage: Orientations toward media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 525-540.
56.
PriceV.StroudN. J. (2006). Public attitudes toward polls: Evidence from the 2000 US presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 393-421.
57.
PriceV.TewksburyD. (1996). Measuring the third-person effect of news: The impact of question order, contrast and knowledge. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 120-141.
58.
RojasH.ShahD. V.FaberR. J. (1996). For the good of others: Censorship and the third-person effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 163-186.
59.
RoserC. (1990). Involvement, attention, and perceptions of message relevance in the response to persuasive appeals. Communication Research, 17, 571-600.
60.
SalwenM. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship the third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25, 259-285.
61.
SalwenM. B.DriscollP. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the OJ Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47, 60-78.
62.
SalwenM. B.DupagneM. (2001). Third-person perception of television violence: The role of self-perceived knowledge. Media Psychology, 3, 211-236.
63.
ScheufeleD. A.NisbetM. C. (2002). Being a citizen online new opportunities and dead ends. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7, 55-75.
StockmannD.LuoT. (2017). Which social media facilitate online public opinion in China?Problems of Post-Communism, 64(3-4), 1-14.
66.
TamK. Y.HoS. Y. (2005). Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Research, 16, 271-291.
67.
VedlitzAVeblenE. (1980). Voting and contacting two forms of political participation in a suburban community. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 16, 31-48.
68.
WeiR.LoV. H.LuH. Y. (2007). Reconsidering the relationship between the third-person perception and optimistic bias. Communication Research, 34, 665-684.
69.
WeiR.LoV. H.LuH. Y. (2008). Third-person effects of health news: Exploring the relationships among media exposure, presumed media influence, and behavioral intentions. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(2), 1-17.
70.
WeiR.LoV. H.LuH. Y. (2010). The third-person effect of tainted food product recall news: Examining the role of credibility, attention, and elaboration for college students in Taiwan. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 598-614.
71.
WeiR.LoV. H.LuH. Y. (2011). Examining the perceptual gap and behavioral intention in the perceived effects of polling news in the 2008 Taiwan presidential election. Communication Research, 38, 206-227.
72.
WeiR.LoV. H.LuH. Y. (2015, August). Issue importance, perceived effects of protest news and political participation. Paper presented at the 99th Annual Convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, San Francisco, CA.”
WhiteH. A. (1995, August). Issue involvement and argument strength as mediating factors in the third-person effect. Paper presented at the 89th Annual Convention of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
75.
WhiteH. A. (1997). Considering interacting factors in the third-person effect: Argument strength and social distance. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 557-564.
76.
XuY. L.ChenY. (2016). The study of anti-corruption news in Chinese media. Journal of Journalism & Communication, 7, 17-18.
ZhangF. (2013). Traditional media coverage of anti-corruption movement in China under new media environment. Journal of Xiamen University of Technology, 21, 87-91.
