AraujoT.WonnebergerA.NeijensP.de VreeseC. (2017). How much time do you spend online? Understanding and improving the accuracy of self-reported measures of Internet use. Communication Methods and Measures, 11, 173-190. doi:10.1080/19312458.2017.1317337
2.
BaumgartnerS. E.WirthW. (2012). Affective priming during the processing of news articles. Media Psychology, 15, 1-18. doi:10.1080/15213269.2011.648535
3.
BoulianneS. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26, 193-211. doi:10.1080/10584600902854363
4.
BoulianneS. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 524-538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
5.
BoulianneS. (2017). Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe. Information, Communication & Society, 1-16. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353641
6.
ChanM. (2016). Social network sites and political engagement: Exploring the impact of Facebook connections and uses on political protest and participation. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 430-451. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1161803
7.
de VreeseC. H.BoukesM.SchuckA.VliegenthartR.BosL.LelkesY. (2017). Linking survey and media content data: Opportunities, considerations, and pitfalls. Communication Methods and Measures, 11, 221-244. doi:10.1080/19312458.2017.1380175
8.
de VreeseC. H.NeijensP. (2016). Measuring media exposure in a changing communications environment. Communication Methods and Measures, 10, 69-80. doi:10.1080/19312458.2016.1150441
9.
DimitrovaD. V.BystromD. G. (2017). The role of social media in the 2016 Iowa caucuses. Journal of Political Marketing, 16(3-4), 386-406. doi:10.1080/15377857.2017.1345847
10.
DimitrovaD. V.ShehataA.StrömbäckJ.NordL. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41, 95-118. doi:10.1177/0093650211426004
11.
EvelandW. P.MoreyA. C.HutchensM. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1082-1103.
12.
FarringtonD. P. (1991). Longitudinal research strategies: Advantages, problems, and prospects. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 369-374. doi:10.1097/00004583-199105000-00003
13.
GildeZunigaH.BachmannI.HsuS.-H.BrundidgeJ. (2013). Expressive versus consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538-1559.
14.
HeissR.MatthesJ. (2016). Mobilizing for some: The effects of politicians’ participatory Facebook posts on young people’s political efficacy. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(3), 123-135. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000199
15.
HopmannD. N.MatthesJ.NirL. (2015). Informal political conversation across time and space: Setting the research agenda. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27, 448-460.
16.
KarpJ. A.BrockingtonD. (2005). Social desirability and responsive validity: A comparative analysis of over reporting voter turnout in five countries. The Journal of Politics, 67, 825-840. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00341.x
17.
KnollJ.MatthesJ.HeissR. (2018). The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1354856517750366
18.
KühneR.SchemerC.MatthesJ.WirthW. (2011). Affective priming in political campaigns: How campaign-induced emotions prime political opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 485-507. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr004
19.
MoscaL.QuarantaM. (2016). News diets, social media use and non-institutional participation in three communication ecologies: Comparing Germany, Italy and the UK. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 325-345. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1105276
20.
MoyP.MurphyJ. (2016). Problems and prospects in survey research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 16-37. doi:10.1177/1077699016631108
21.
NeoR. L. (2015). Favoritism or animosity? Examining how SNS network homogeneity influences vote choice via affective mechanisms. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28, 461-483. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv035
22.
PageJ. T.DuffyM. E. (2018). What does credibility look like? Tweets and walls in U.S. presidential candidates’ visual storytelling. Journal of Political Marketing, 17(1), 3-31. doi:10.1080/15377857.2016.1171819
23.
PerssonM.SolevidM. (2014). Measuring political participation-testing social desirability bias in a web-survey experiment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26, 98-112. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt002
ScharkowM. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported Internet use: A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10, 13-27. doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446
26.
SegijnC. M.VoorveldH. A. M.VandebergL.SmitE. G. (2017). The battle of the screens: Unraveling attention allocation and memory effects when multiscreening. Human Communication Research, 43, 295-314. doi:10.1111/hcre.12106
27.
ShahD. V.ChoJ.EvelandW. P.KwakN.Jr. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531-565. doi:10.1177/0093650205279209
28.
SkoricM.ZhuQ.GohD.PangN. (2016). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18, 1817-1839. doi:10.1177/1461444815616221
TheocharisY.QuintelierE. (2016). Stimulating citizenship or expanding entertainment? The effect of Facebook on adolescent participation. New Media & Society, 18, 817-836. doi:10.1177/1461444814549006
31.
ValenzuelaS. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 920-942. doi:10.1177/0002764213479375
32.
Van AelstP.StrömbäckJ.EsserF.de VreeseC.MatthesJ.HopmannD. N.. . . StanyerJ. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy?Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 3-27. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
33.
XenosM.VromenA.LoaderB. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 151-167. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318