The parliamentary media adviser is commonly portrayed as a partisan “spin-doctor,” with little distinction made between the inherent partisan nature of the role and the personal partisanship of the practitioner. Semistructured qualitative interviews with 21 journalists who became parliamentary media advisers highlight the difference between the two and offer practitioner perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of partisanship in that role. At one extreme is the “true believer”; at the other is the “legal advocate,” with the “committed expert” in between. In doing so, this article challenges the simple, dominant conception of the partisan “spin-doctor.”
AbbottM.CohenB. (2014). The accountability of ministerial staff. Australian Journal of Political Science, 49, 316-333.
2.
AucoinP. (2012). New political governance in Westminster systems: Impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance, 25, 177-199.
3.
BehmA. (2015). No minister: So you want to be a chief of staff?Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
4.
BiddleB. (1986). Recent development in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67-92.
5.
BlumerH. (1998). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1969)
6.
BotanC.TrowbridgeJ. (2013). Public relations theory: Past, present and future. In FröhlichR.SzyszkaP.BenteleG. (Eds.), Handbuch der Public Relations: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und berufliches Handeln (pp. 357-380). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
7.
BrymanA. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2002). Senate Select Committee on a certain maritime incident. Canberra: Australian Senate.
10.
ConnaughtonB. (2010). “Glorified gofers, policy experts or good generalists”: A classification of the roles of the Irish ministerial adviser. Irish Political Studies, 25, 347-369.
11.
CookT. E. (1988). Press secretaries and media strategies in the House of Representatives: Deciding whom to pursue. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 1047-1069.
12.
CookT. E. (2005). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
CraftJ. (2015). Conceptializing the policy work of partisan advisers. Policy Science, 48, 135-158.
DavisA. (2002). Public relations democracy: Public relations, politics and the mass media in Britain. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
16.
DavisA. (2007). The mediation of power: A critical introduction. London, England: Routledge.
17.
DeuzeM. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6, 442-464.
18.
DownesE. J. (1998). Hacks, flacks and spin doctors meet the media: An examination of the congressional press secretary as a (potential) public relations professional. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 263-286.
19.
EichbaumC.ShawR. (Eds.). (2010). Partisan appointees and public servants: An international analysis of the role of the political adviser. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
20.
EsserF.ReinemannC.FanD. (2001). Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany: Metacommunication about media manipulation. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6, 16-45. doi:10.1177/1081180X01006001003
21.
EsserF.StrömbäckJ. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of western democracies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
EsserF.TenscherJ. (2005, May26-30). The professionalization dilemma: Exploring a “strategic approach” for political communication experts. Paper presented at the Political Communication Division at the ICA Conference, New York, NY.
23.
FaulknerJ.MacintyreS. (2001). True believers: The story of the Federal Parliamentary Labor Party. Crows Nest, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
24.
FisherC. (2014). From “watchdog” to “spin-doctor”: An examination of the transition from journalist to parliamentary media adviser and back again (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Canberra, Bruce, Australia.
25.
FisherC. (2015). The disclosure dilemma: Returning to journalism after political media advising. Communication Research and Practice, 1, 58-70. doi:10.1080/22041451.2015.1042425
26.
FisherC. (2016). Managing conflict of interest: Shifting between political PR and journalism. Journalism Practice, 10, 373-386. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1027786
27.
FlemingJ.HollandI. (Eds). (2001). Motivating ministers to morality. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate/Dartmouth.
28.
ForwardR. (1975, July11-13). Ministerial staff of the Australian Government 1972-1974: A survey. Paper presented at the A.P.S.A. Conference, The first 1000 days of the Whitlam Government, Canberra College of Advanced Education, Australia.
29.
FranklinB. (1994). Packaging politics: Political communications in Britain’s media democracy. London, England: Edward Arnold.
30.
FurnhamA. (1988). Lay theories: Everyday understandings of problems in the social sciences. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
31.
GaberI. (2000). Government by spin: An analysis of the process. Media Culture & Society, 22, 507-518.
32.
GershonS. A. (2012). Press secretaries, journalists, and editors: Shaping local congressional news coverage. Political Communication, 29, 160-183.
33.
HainesJ. (2004). Marathon men. British Journalism Review, 15, 76-78.
34.
HeideggerM. (2008). Being and time (MacquarrieJ.RobinsonE., Trans.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Thought. (Original work published 1927)
35.
HerbstS. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36.
HofferE. (1951). The true believer: Thoughts on the nature of mass movements. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
37.
House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee. (2012). Special advisers in the thick of it. London, England: House of Commons.
JacksonN. A. (2012). Underused campaigning tools: Political public relations. In Lees-MarshmentJ. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of political marketing (pp. 271-285). London, England: Routledge.
40.
LouwE. (2010). The media and political process. London, England: SAGE.
41.
MaleyM. (2002). Partisans at the centre of government: The role of ministerial advisers in the Keating Government 1991-1996 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Australian National University, Canberra.
42.
McNairB. (2000). Journalism and democracy: An evaluation of the public sphere. London, England: Routledge.
43.
McNairB. (2004). PR must die: Spin, anti-spin and political public relations in the UK, 1997-2004. Journalism Studies, 5, 325-338.
44.
MeadG. H. (1932). Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
45.
MoloneyK. (2006). Rethinking public relations: PR propaganda and democracy (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
46.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2011). Ministerial advisors: Role, influence and management. Paris, France: Author.
47.
Oxford English Dictionary. (1997). The Australian concise Oxford dictionary (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
48.
PelgrimsC. (2006). Personal advisors of ministers: More than personal loyal agents? In PetersG.SootlaG.ConnaughtonB. (Eds.), Politico-administrative dilemma: Traditional problems, new solutions (pp. 69-90). Bratislava, Slovak Republic: The Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe.
49.
PhillippsR. (2002). Media advisers—Shadow players in political communication (Doctoral thesis). University of Sydney, Australia.
50.
PhillisB. (2004). An independent review of government communications. London, England: UK Government.
51.
RhodesR. A. W.TiernanA. (2014). The gatekeepers: Lessons from prime ministers’ chiefs of staff. Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
52.
RichardsonN. (2002). Playing political games: Ministers, minders and information. In TannerS. (Ed.), Journalism investigation and research (pp. 170-183). French’s Forest, New South Wales, Australia: Longman.
53.
RomzekB. S.UtterJ. A. (1997). Congressional legislative staff: Political professionals or clerks?American Journal of Political Science, 41, 1251-1279.
54.
SaldanaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
ShawR.EichbaumC. (2014). Ministers, minders and the core executive: Why ministers appoint political advisors in Westminster contexts. Parliamentary Affairs, 67, 584-616.
56.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237-246.
57.
TiernanA. (2001). Problem or solution? The role of ministerial staff. In FlemingJ.HollandI. (Eds.), Motivating ministers to morality (pp. 91-103). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate/Dartmouth.
58.
TiernanA. (2007). Power without responsibility. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
59.
TiernanA.WellerP. (2010). Ministers and their private offices. In TiernanA.WellerP. (Eds.), Learning to be a minister: Heroic expectations, practical realities (pp. 253-295). Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
60.
WalterJ. (1986). The minister’s minders: Personal advisers in national government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
WalterJ. (2006). Ministers, minders and public servants: Changing parameters of responsibility in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65, 22-27.
62.
WannaJ. (2006). Insisting on traditional ministerial responsibility and the constitutional independence of the public service: The Gomery Inquiry and the Canadian sponsorship scandal. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65, 15-21.
63.
WardI. (2003). An Australian PR state?Australian Journal of Communication, 30, 25-42.
64.
YongB.HazellR. (2014). Special advisers: Who they are and why they matter. London, England: Hart Publishing.
