Issue obtrusiveness has long been considered a condition in agenda-setting effect of mass media. Public’s perceived salience of news issues has been found to be more strongly influenced by mass media for unobtrusive issues than obtrusive issues. This study measures the issue obtrusiveness contingency in a developing country by comparing public perception of 10 different issues with varying levels of obtrusiveness. The findings support the original issue obtrusiveness contingency, and add that the public in developing countries report salience of obtrusive issues based on their own personal experience rather than from media exposure.
Al-HaqeelA. S.MelkoteS. R. (1995). International agenda-setting effects of Saudi Arabian media: A case study. Gazette: International Journal for Communication Studies, 55, 17-37.
3.
AnamM. (2002). The media and development in Bangladesh. In The World Bank Institute (Ed.), The right to tell: The role of mass media in economic development (pp. 267-274). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
4.
AndaleebS. S.RahmanA.RajebM.AkterN.GulshanS. (2012). Credibility of TV news in a developing country: The case of Bangladesh. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 73-90.
5.
AtwaterT.FicoF.PizanteG. (1987). Reporting on the state legislature: A case study of inter-media agenda-setting. Newspaper Research Journal, 8(2), 53-61.
BhuiyanA. J. M. S. A. (2002). The political economy of mass communication in Bangladesh. Journal of International Communication, 8, 118-136.
8.
BloodR. W. (1981). Unobtrusive issues in the agenda-setting role of the press (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
9.
ChaH.SongY.KimJ. R. (2010). Effects of issue ownership and issue obtrusiveness on corporate reputation at two Korean corporations. Public Relations Review, 36, 289-291. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.03.001
10.
ChaffeeS. H.IzcarayF. (1975). Mass communication functions in a media-rich developing society. Communication Research, 2, 367-395.
11.
DemersD. P.CraffD.PessinB. M.ChoiY.-H. (1989). Issue obtrusiveness and the agenda-setting effects of national network news. Communication Research, 16, 793-812.
12.
DuY. (2007, May). Is the agenda-setting process different outside the United States? A multinational agenda-setting test. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
GolanG. (2006). Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage: Assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies, 7, 323-333.
JeffresL.AtkinD.BrackenC.NeuendorfK. (2008). Integrating theoretical traditions in media effects: Using third-person effects to link agenda-setting and cultivation. Mass Communication and Society, 11, 470-491. doi:10.1080/15205430802375303
20.
KosickiG. M. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 100-127. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01265.x
21.
LasorsaD. L.WantaW. (1990). Effects of personal, interpersonal and media experiences on issue saliences. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 67, 804-813.
22.
LeeG. (2004). Reconciling “cognitive priming” vs “obtrusive contingency” hypotheses: An analytical model of media agenda-setting effects. Gazette, 66, 151-166.
23.
McCombsM. (2013). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
24.
McCombsM.ReynoldsA. (2009). How the news shapes our civic agenda. In JenningsB.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
25.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
26.
MohamedH.GunterB. (2009). Agenda-setting in a quasi-democratic country. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 2, 135-158. doi:10.1386/jammr.2.1
27.
OnyebadiU. (2008). Towards an examination and expansion of the agenda setting theory: Did the media matter in Kenya’s presidential election, 2007? Available from Dissertations and Theses Database (AAT 3374913).
28.
OstiniJ.OstiniA. Y. (2002). Beyond the four theories of the press: A new model of national media systems. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 41-56.
29.
Reporters Without Borders. (n.d.). Bangladesh: Don’t criticize the constitution or Islam. Author. Retrieved from https://rsf.org/en/bangladesh
30.
RiffeD.FreitagA. (1997). A content analysis of content analyses: Twenty-five years of Journalism Quarterly. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 515-524.
ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297-316. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
33.
SiebertF. S.SchrammW. (1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and Soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
ThussuD. K. (Ed.). (2009). Internationalizing media studies. London, England: Routledge.
36.
ValenzuelaS.McCombsM. (2007, May). Agenda-setting effects on vote choice: Evidence from the 2006 Mexican election. In annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
37.
VuH. N. N.GehrauV. (2010). Agenda diffusion: An integrated model of agenda setting and interpersonal communication. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87, 100-116. doi:10.1177/107769901008700106
38.
WalgraveS.Van AelstP. (2006). The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88-109. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x
39.
WangG. (2011). Beyond de-Westernizing communication research: An introduction. In WangG. (Ed.), De-Westernizing communication research (pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
WantaW.HuY.-W. (1994a). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 71, 90-98.
41.
WantaW.HuY. W. (1994b). Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 225-240.
42.
WeimannG.TustinD. H.van VuurenD.JoubertJ. P. R. (2007). Looking for opinion leaders: traditional vs. modern measures in traditional societies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 173-190. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edm005
43.
YagadeA.DozierD. M. (1990). The media agenda-setting effect of concrete versus abstract issues. Journalism Quarterly, 67(1), 3-10.
44.
ZhuJ.-H. (1992). Issue competition and attention distraction: A zero-sum theory of agenda-setting. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69, 825-836. doi: 10.1177/107769909206900403
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
