Abstract
This study examines the New York Times' news and editorial coverage of Hitler's first two months as German chancellor. While news stories and editorials are analyzed with respect to scope and bias, particular attention is also paid to the decision-making processes within the newspaper itself. An archival-driven methodology is used in conjunction with the more conventional product-driven one. Memoranda and cables between publishers, editors, and foreign correspondents are examined in addition to back issues of the newspaper itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.