AppleM. (1992). “Constructing the Captive Audience: Channel One and the Political Economy of the Text,” International Studies in Sociology of Education, vol.2, no. 2, pp. 107–31.
2.
BarlowD. (January 1993). “Channel One Counterpoint,” Education Digest, 58, no. 5, p. 15.
3.
BarlowD. (October 1992). “Channel One Update,” Education Digest, 58, no. 2, p. 26–28.
4.
BarrettJ. (January 1998). “Channel One TV Equipment: Reports about its Usage in Massachusetts Schools,” Connecting with the Community: Exploring Resources for Visual Learning and Expression, Griffin, Robert, ed., pp. 19–32.
5.
BarrettJ. (May 22–26, 1997). “Channel One: Reports from Teachers in Massachusetts. ”Montreal, Canada. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference.
6.
BarrettJ. (Nov. 23–26, 1996). “Channel One television in Massachusetts Secondary Schools.” San Diego, CA. Paper presented at the Annual Speech Communication Association Convention.
7.
BarrettJ. (Aug. 9–12, 1995). “Student and Teacher Perspectives on Channel One: A Qualitative Study of Participants in Massachusetts and Florida Schools.” Washington, D.C. Paper presented at the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication Convention.
8.
BarrettJ. (May, 1996). Teaching with Channel One Television Equipment: Teacher Participants Report Their Practices. Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Doctoral Dissertation.
9.
BogdanR.BiklenS. K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education and Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
10.
CanningsTerrence (1993). The Technology Age Classroom. Irvine, Calif.: Franklin, Beedle Assoc.
11.
CarlinT. and others (1992). “The perception of the Educational Value of Channel One among Secondary Level Teachers and Students,” Paper presented at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
12.
CelanoD.NeumanS. (February 1995). “Channel One: The Delimma of Teaching and Selling,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 444–446.
13.
ChiraS. (April 23, 1992). “Little Help from School television Show -Study of Channel One,” The New York Times, p. A8.
14.
CohenA. (March-April 1992). “Creating a Video Library: An Oral History Project,” Perspectives in Education, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2–5.
15.
ConveryA. (1990). “Using television Programs in the Classroom: A Teacher's Experience,” Journal of Educational Television, vol. 16, no. 3.
16.
CramerR. (1995). “Channel One as a Current Events Medium for Secondary School Students.” Journal of Interlibrary Loan, vol. 6, n1, pp. 63–82.
17.
DaoJ. (May 19, 1993). “Channel One, Round Two: New Push to Bring television to NY Schools,” The New York Times, p. B1 and B4.
18.
DaoJ. (June 26, 1993). “New York Regents Reaffirm Ban on television Program in Classrooms.” The New York Times, p. 16 and p. 21.
19.
DeFleurM. et al. (Winter, 1992). “Audience Recall of News Stories Presented by Newspaper, Computer, Television and Radio,” Journalism Quarterly, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1010–1022.
20.
De VaneyA., ed., (1994). Watching Channel One: The Convergence of Students, Technology, and Private Business. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
21.
EhmanL. (Nov. 22, 1991). “Using Channel One in Social Studies Classrooms: A First Look,” Washington, D.C., Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Social Studies.
22.
EhmanL. (April 18–22, 1995). “A Case Study of Channel One in the Instruction and Curriculum of a Middle School.” San Francisco, Calif. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
23.
EndresK.EndresF.MilesT. (August 1991). “Whittle's Channel One and CNN's Newsroom: A Systematic Pilot Study of Teen Oriented News Content,” Boston, Mass. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
24.
FitzgeraldM. (May 18, 1992). “Classroom television Has Negligible Effect: Study Examines Whittle,” Editor and Publisher125, no. 20, p. 20–22.
25.
FolkemerP.HobbsR. (Jan. 26, 1994). “Refocusing the Channel One Debate,” Education Week, vol. XIII, no. 18, p. 11.
26.
ForsslundT. (1991). “Factors that Influence the Use and Impact of Educational Television in School,” Journal of Educational Television, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 15–30.
27.
FoxR. (1997). “Mirroring, Blurring, and Replaying: How Students Respond to Television Commercials.” Research Report, U. of Missouri, 18 pp.
28.
GillimL. (September/October 1994). “Lessons from Channel One: It's the Teacher, Not the Television, That Matters.” Harvard Education Letter, vol. X, no. 5, pp. 7–8.
29.
GreenbergB. (December-January, 1993–94). “Channel One: But What About the Advertising?” Educational Leadership, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 56–58.
30.
GreenbergB.BrandJ. (Winter 1993). “Television News and Advertising in Schools: The Channel One Controversy.” Journal of Communication43, no. 1, pp. 143–151.
31.
GreenwoodV. (Nov. 18–21, 1995). “Commercialism in the Classroom: The Controversial Partnership of Education and Business.” San Antonio, Texas. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication.
32.
HoffmanL. M. (April 3–7, 1991). “The Meanings of Channel One: Curriculum, Instruction, and Ethics; History, Control, and Rhetoric.” Chicago, IL. Unpublished paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
33.
JohnsonJ.BrzezinskiE. (1994). Channel One: A Three-Year Perspective. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, U. of Michigan,; 313–763–5325.
34.
JohnstonJ. (February 1995). “Channel One: The Dilemma of Teaching and Selling,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 436–443.
KleinfieldN. (May 19, 1991). “What is Chris Whittle Teaching Our Children?” The New York Times Magazine, p. 32–33.
37.
KonradW. (January 27, 1992). “How Good is Attendance in Chris Whittle's Class? Channel One Television - Satellite Broadcast to Schools,” Business Week, no. 3249, P. 103.
38.
KoontzF. (Feb. 5–9, 1992). “An Assessment of Teacher Trainees' Attitudes toward Selected Instructional Media” Washington, DC. Paper presented at the Convention of the Association for Education Communications and Technology. Eric Document # 348007.
39.
KozolJ. (September 21, 1992). “Whittle and The Privateers: Corporate Raid on Education,” The Nation, vol. 255, no. 8, p. 272–277.
40.
KnupferN. et al (February 5–9, 1992). “The Significance of the Channel One Experiment: Report on the First Year.” Washington, D.C., Paper presented at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
41.
KnupferN. (January 13–17, 1993). “Channel One: Reactions of Students, Teachers and Parents.” New Orleans, LA. Paper presented at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
42.
Massachusetts Department of Education, (1985). A New Classification Scheme for Communities in Massachusetts. Quincy, Mass.: Massachusetts Department of Education.
43.
MillerM. (1997). “How to be Stupid: The Teachings of Channel One.” Paper prepared for Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR), U. of Maryland, 11 pp.
44.
MolnarA. (Sept. 1, 1995). “Schooled for Profit,” Educational Leadership, vol. 53, no. 9 pp. 70–71.
45.
MolnarA. (September 1994). “Education for Profit: A Yellowbrick Road to Nowhere,” Educational Leadership, vol. 23, no. 9 pp. 66–70.
46.
MorganM. (Oct. 13, 1993). “Channel One in the Public Schools: Widening the Gaps,” Amherst, MA: Department of Communications, University of Massachusetts
47.
MurphyJ. (1980). Getting the Facts: A Fieldwork Guide for Evaluators and Policy Analysts. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing.
48.
NasstromR. (March 30, 1996). “Channel One and CNN News room: A Comparative Study of Seven Districts.” Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Paper presented at the National Conference on Creating the Quality School.
49.
Oakland Public Schools (1991). Teaching and Learning with Technology. Report issued by Oakland County Schools, Michigan. Eric Document #339362.
PostmanN. (1985). Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Disclosure in the Age of Show Business. New York: Viking.
52.
PostmanN. (1992). Technopoly: the Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
53.
PowersJ. (Dec. 6, 1992). “P is for Profit: The Entrepreneurial Educator,” The Boston Globe Magazine, p.14–15, p. 22–28 and p.31–35.
54.
RankH. (December-January, 1993–94). “Channel One: Asking the Wrong Questions,” Educational Leadership, vol. 51, no. 4 pp. 52–55.
55.
RankH. (April 1992). “Channel One: Misconceptions Three,” English Journal, 81 no. 4, pp. 31–32.
56.
RistM. C. (1989). “Mass Marketers Have a Sweet Deal for You, but There Are Strings Attached,” American School Board Journal176 (9), 20–24.
57.
RudinowJ. (1989–90, December-January). “Channel One Whittles Away at Education,” Educational Leadership47(4) pp. 70–73.
58.
SchnabelG. (1992). Factors that Influence Teacher Acceptance of Television. Masters Research Paper, St. Cloud State University. Eric Document #364185.
59.
SharpeA. (Sept. 22, 1994). “Little of Whittle Remains After Sale,” Wall Street Journal, p. B5
60.
State of North Carolina v. Whittle Communications, 402 S.E. 2d 556 (N.C. 1991).
61.
StraubhaarLaRose (1996), Communications Media in the Information Society, Belmont CA, Wadsworth Pub. Co.
62.
SupovitzJ. (March 15, 1991). “Tuning in on Current Events: The Uses and Effects of Video News Programs in High Schools in Mississippi and North Carolina.” (unpublished research report: executive summary) Research Triangle Park, N.C.
63.
TieneD. (March 1995). “TV or Not TV? That is the Question: A Study of the Effects of Channel One.” Instructional Technology, vol. 59, n. 3, pp. 159–164.
64.
TieneD. (May 1993). “Channel One: Good or Bad News for our Schools?” Educational Leadership50, no. 8, p.46.
65.
TieneD. (May 1993). “Exploring the Effectiveness of the Channel One School Telecasts.” Educational Technology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 36–42.
66.
Tozzo-LylesTeresaA.Walsh-Childers (Aug. 9–12, 1995). “Family Views: The Effects of Educating Parents to Mediate Their Children's Television Viewing on Children's Comprehension of Television Commercials.” Washington, DC. Paper presented at the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication Convention.
67.
WalshM. (May 12, 1993). “Whittle Fights to Open Door for Channel One in NY,” Education Week, p. 5.
68.
WartellaE. (Feb. 6, 1995). “Channel One: The Dilemma of Teaching and Selling,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 448–451.
69.
WhitmoreE. (Oct. 13–17, 1993). “Examining the Impact of the Channel One Newscasts” in Visual Literacy in the Digital Age: Selected Readings from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association. Rochester, N.Y. Eric Document # 370590.
70.
WulfemeyerK. T. (Fall 1992). “Channel One and Commercials in Classrooms: Advertising Content Aimed at Students,” Journalism Quarterly, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 724–42.
71.
WulfemeyerK. T.MuellerB. (Aug. 1–4, 1990). “Commercials in the Classroom: A Content Analysis of Channel One Advertisements.” Minneapolis, MN: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 325*-575.
72.
YeagerE.PandiscioE. (May 1993). “Newscasts in the Classroom,” Educational Leadership, vol. 50, no. 8., p. 52–53.
73.
YinR. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.