BowlesD. (1989, January). “Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. National press reaction to the decision and its impact in Tennessee high schools.” Paper presented at the midwinter meeting of the Secondary Education Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
2.
BussW. G. (1989). “School newspapers, public forum, and the First Amendment.” Iowa Law Review74, 505–543.
3.
CampbellL. R. (1976). “Principals' attitudes toward student journalism and freedom of the press.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Quill and Scroll Society, Iowa City, IA.
4.
ClickJ. W.KopenhaverL. L. (1988). “Principals favor discipline more than a free press.” Journalism Educator, 43 (2), 48–51.
5.
ClickJ. W.KopenhaverL. L. (1990, August). “Opinions of principals and newspaper advisors toward student press freedom and adviser responsibilities following Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier.” Paper presented at the convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Minneapolis, Minn.
6.
ClickJ. W.KopenhaverL. L.HatcherL. (1993). “Attitudes of principals and teachers toward student press freedom.” Journalism Educator, 48 (1), 59–70.
7.
Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, 473 U.S. 788 (1985).
8.
CrowL. R. (1992). “The impact of Texas high school students' and principals' perceptions of student press freedom following the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier Supreme Court decision.” Unpublished master's thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla.
9.
DicksonT. (1989a). “Attitudes of high school principals about press freedom after Hazelwood.” Journalism Quarterly66, 169–173.
10.
DicksonT. (1989b, August). “How advisers view the status of high school press freedom following the Hazelwood decision.” Paper presented at the convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, D.C.
11.
DicksonT. (1991, January). “How advisers view changes in the high school press in the post- Hazelwood Era.” Study presented at the midwinter meeting of the Secondary Education Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Miami, Fla.
12.
DicksonT. (1994). “Self-censorship and freedom of the high school press.” Journalism Educator, 49 (3), 56–63.
13.
DvorakJ. (1992, April). Secondary school journalism in the United States. (High School Journalism Institute Insight Research Report). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, High School Press Institute.
14.
DvorakJ.DiltsJ. P. (1991, January). “Post- Hazelwood considerations for high school publications.” Paper presented at the midwinter meeting of the Secondary Education Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Miami, FL.
15.
DvorakJ.DiltsJ. P. (1992). “Legacy of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier: Academic freedom vs. administrative authority.” Journalism Educator, 47 (3), 3–12.
16.
DvorakJ.LainL.DicksonT. (1994). Journalism kids do better: What research tells us about high school journalism. Bloomington, IN: ERIC-Edinfo Press.
17.
EveslageT. (1980, August). “A research agenda for journalism in the secondary schools.” Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
18.
EveslageT. (1995, August). “The high school ethics challenge: Using standards of professional journalism without the freedoms of the professional press.” Paper presented at the convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
19.
Fujishima v. Board of Education, 460 F. 2nd 1355, 7th Circuit (1972).
20.
Gambino v. Fairfax County School Board, 429 F. Supp. 731 (E.D. Va.), affirmed 564 F. 2d 157, 4th Cir. (1977).
21.
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).
22.
HorineD. D. (1966). “How principals, advisers and editors view the high school newspaper.” Journalism Quarterly43, 339–345.
23.
JamesM. (1970, October). “Propaganda or education? Censorship and school journalism.” Arizona English Bulletin, 33 (1).
24.
Journalism Education Association (JEA) (1973, Summer). “JEA statement on freedom of the press.” Communication: Journalism Education Today, p. 17.
25.
Journalism Education Association (JEA) (1988a, April). “Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. A threat and a challenge to high school journalism.” Document prepared for the JEA Spring convention. San Francisco: JEA.
26.
Journalism Education Association (JEA) (1988b). Student press rights position. (Available from JEA, Kedzie Hall 103, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506–1501.)
27.
Journalism Education Association (JEA) (1990). Prior review statement of the Journalism Education Association. (Available from JEA, Kedzie Hall 103, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506–1501.)
28.
KnightR. (1988). “High school journalism in the post-Hazelwood era.” Journalism Educator, 43 (2), 42–47.
29.
KovacsM. (1991, February-March). “The impact of Hazelwood in the state of Indiana.” Quill and Scroll, pp. 4–7.
30.
KristofN. D. (1983). Freedom of the high school press. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
31.
LainL. (1992). “A national study of high school newspaper programs: Environmental and adviser characteristics.” Paper presented at the convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Montreal, Canada.
32.
NelsonJ. (1974). Captive voices: The report of the Commission of Inquiry into High School Journalism. New York: Schocken Books.
33.
NykaJ. J. (1976). “Censorship of Illinois high school newspapers.” Unpublished manuscript.
34.
OlsonL. D.Van OmmerenR.RossowM. (1992, August). “The nation's scholastic press association directors describe the state of high school journalism.” Paper presented at the convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Montreal, Canada.
35.
Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association, 460 U.S. 37 (1983).
36.
PetersonJ. W. (1991, Spring). “Plotting a course to spark scholastic journalism research.” Communication: Journalism Education Today, 15–17.
37.
RenfroP.RenfroB.BennettR. (1988). “Expectations of change in the high school press after Hazelwood: A survey of Texas high school principals, newspaper advisers and newspaper editors.” Southwestern Mass Communication Journal1, 169–173.
38.
SalomoneR. C. (1992). “Free speech and school governance in the wake of Hazelwood.” Georgia Law Review, 26 (2), 253–322.
39.
Student Press Law Center (SPLC). (1985). Law of the student press. Washington, DC: SPLC.
40.
Student Press Law Center (SPLC). (1994). Law of the student press (rev. ed.). Washington, DC: SPLC.
41.
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
42.
TragerR.DickersonD. L. (1980). “Prior restraint in high school: Law, attitudes and practice.” Journalism Quarterly57, 135–138.
43.
TragerR.RussomannoJ. A. (1993, August). “Free speech for public school students: A ‘basic educational mission’.” Paper presented at the convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City, MO.