AndersonP. (1987) Faculty and student observations of their computing behavior. In KieslerS.SproullL.Computing and change on campus. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AppelbaumS. H.PrimmerB. (1990) An HRx for Computer Anxiety. Personnel, 67 (9), 8–11.
3.
BagozziR. P. (1992) Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45 (7) 659–686.
4.
D'SouzaP. (1991) The use of electronic mail as an instructional aid: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18 (3), 106–110.
5.
ElasmarM. (1993a) Dissonance-motivated selective exposure to foreign-oriented news—an emprical inquiry. Unpublished manuscript, College of Communication, Boston University.
6.
ElasmarM. (1993b) Human factor impact on Videotex diffusion and usage patterns in business organizations. Paper presented during the International Communication Association's 1994 Conference, Sydney Australia.
7.
GalatiT. (1986, October) Electronic communication: Implications for training. Training and Development Journal, 42–45.
8.
HesseB.WWernerC. M.AltmanI. (1988) Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communciation. Computers in Human Behavior, 4 (3), 147–165.
9.
HiltzR. (1986) The “Virtual Classroom”: Using computer-mediated communication for University teaching. Journal of Communication, 36 (2), 95–104.
10.
HiltzS. R.JohnsonK. (1990) User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems. Management Science, 36 (6), 739–764.
11.
HudiburgR. (1990) Relating computer-associated stress to computerphobia. Psychological Reports67, 311–314.
12.
HudiburgR. A. (1989) Psychology of computer use: XVII. The computer technology hassles scale: Revision, reliability and some correlates. Psychological Reports65, 1387–1394.
13.
HuffC.SproullL.KieslerS. (1989) Computer communication and organizational commitment: Tracing the relationship in a city government. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19 (16), 1371–1391.
14.
IgbariaM et.al. (1989) Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage. Information and Management16, 187–196.
15.
IgbariaM.ParasuramanS. (1989) A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers. Journal of Management, 15 (3), 373–388.
16.
KendrlK.BroihierM. C.FleetwoodC. (1989) Children and computers: Do sex-related differences persist? Journal of Communication, 39 (3), 85–93.
17.
KernanM. C.HowardG. S. (1990) Computer anxiety and computer attitudes: An investigation of construct and predictiive validity issues. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50 (3), 681–690.
18.
KerrE. B.HiltzS. R. (1982) Computer-mediated communication systems. New York: Academic Press.
19.
MillerM. (1993, 15 November) Contact high: Computer networks have transformed campus life—and the changes hint at what may lie ahead for us all. The Wall Street Journal, p. R4.
20.
PapaM. (1990) Communication network patterns and employee performance with new technology. Communication Research, 17 (3), 344–368.
21.
RapaportM. (1991) Groupware vs. CCS: Comparing benefits and functionality. Telecommunications, 1137–40.
22.
RaubA. C. (1981) cited in Kernan, M.C. and Howard, G.S. (1990) Computer anxiety and computer attitudes: An investigation of construct and predictive validity issues. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50 (3), 681–690.
23.
RiceR. E. (1987) Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication, 37 (4) 65–94.
24.
SchaefermeyerM.SewellE. H. (1988) Communicating by electronic mail. American Behavioral Scientist, 32 (2), 112–123.
25.
SchmitzJ.FulkJ. (1991) Organizational colleagues, media richness and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18 (4), 487–523.
26.
SeinM.BostromR. (1989) Individual differences and conceptual models in training novice users. Human-Computer Interaction4, 197–229.
27.
SproullL.KieslerS. (1993) Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
28.
TrevinoL. K.WebsterJ. (1992) Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research, 19 (5), 539–573.