Alliance for Community Media v. FCC, 56 F.3d 105 (D.C. Cir. 1995), cert granted, 64 U.S.L.W. 3343 (Nov. 14, 1995) (No. 95–227).
2.
Antonelli v. Hammond, 308 F. Supp. 1329 (D. Mass. 1970).
3.
AveryK. B.SimpsonR. J. (1987). The constitution and student publications: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Law & Education16, 1–61.
4.
Bayer v. Kinzler, 515 F. 2d 504 (2d Cir. 1975).
5.
Bazaar v. Fortune, 476 F. 2d 570 (5th Cir. 1973).
6.
BryneJ. P. (1991). Racial insults and free speech within the university. Georgetown Law Review79, 399–443.
7.
CanbyW. C. (1974). The First Amendment and the state as editor: Implications for public broadcasting. Texas Law Review52, 1123–1165.
8.
Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102–385, 106 Stat. 1460 (1992).
9.
DiBona v. Matthews, 220 Cal. App. 3d 1329 (1990).
10.
Dickey v. Alabama Bd. of Educ., 273 F. Supp. 613 (M.D. Ala. 1967), vacated as moot, Troy State Univ. v. Dickey, 402 F. 2d 515 (5th Cir. 1968).
11.
DrushelB. E. (1994, March). What can we say? The problem of offensive speech on student electronic media. Paper presented at the meeting of the Broadcast Education Association, Las Vegas, NV.
12.
DvorakJ.DiltsJ. P. (1992). Academic freedom vs. administrative authority. Journalism Educator, 47 (3), 3–12.
13.
Federal Communications Commission. (1978). Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, 69 FCC 2d 1384.
14.
FCC v. Pacifica Found., 438 U.S. 726 (1978).
15.
FCC v. League of Women Voters, 468 U.S. 364 (1984).
16.
Hazelwood School Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 108 S.Ct. 562 (1981).
17.
HazinskiD. (1994). College tv news network desired. Feedback, 35 (1), 24–27.
18.
Healy v. James, 408 U.S. 169 (1972).
19.
Joyner v. Whiting, 477 F. 2d 456 (4th Cir. 1973).
20.
KramerD. T. (1994). Annotation, validity under federal constitution, of public school or state college regulation of student newspapers, magazines, or other publications—federal cases. American Law Reports16, 182–247.
21.
McKeeK. B.PaniciD. (1992). Governance of university television and cable stations. Journalism Educator, 47 (3), 13–17.
22.
Muir v. Alabama Educational Television Commission, 688 F. 2d 1033 (5th Cir. 1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1023 (1983).
23.
National Association of College Broadcasters. (1992). NACB station handbook: 1992 tv edition. Providence, RI: Author.
24.
Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931).
25.
Nicholson v. Bd. of Educ., 682 F. 2d 858 (9th Cir. 1982).
26.
Papish v. Board of Curators, 410 U.S. 667 (1973).
27.
PaxtonM. (1995, April). “The First Amendment and second-class students: The courts and campus broadcasters.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Broadcast Education Association, Las Vegas, NV.
28.
Rathbone v. Day, No. 86–2420-S (S.D. Cal, 1986).
29.
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969).
30.
Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214 (1985).
31.
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, 115 S.Ct. 2510 (1995).
32.
Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173 (1991).
33.
Schneider v. Indian River Community College Foundation, 875 F. 2d 1537 (11th Cir. 1989).
34.
Stanley v. Magrath, 719 F. 2d 279 (8th Cir. 1983).
35.
SteinM. L. (1994, September 4). Stealing and trashing newspapers is current campus craze. Editor & Publisher, pp. 13, 39.
36.
StoneJ. E.ZedalisC. L. (1983). Student editorial discretion, the First Amendment, and public access to the campus press. University of California at Davis Law Review16, 1089–1122.
37.
TenhoffG. C. (1991). Censoring the public university student press: A constitutional challenge. Southern California Law Review64, 511–547.
38.
Trujillo v. Love, 322 F. Supp. 1266 (D. Colo. 1971).
39.
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, 46 RR 2d 565 (1979).
40.
Yale Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 478 F. 2d 594 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert denied, 414 U.S. 914 (1973).
41.
Zucker v. Panitz, 299 F. Supp. 102 (S.D.N.Y. 1969).