BroomG. M. (1982). A comparison of sex roles in public relations. Public Relations Review, 8, 17–22.
2.
BroomG. M.DozierD. M. (1986). Advancement for public relations role models. Public Relations Review, 12, 37–56.
3.
BuchholzR. A. (1982). Business environment and public policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
ChaseW. H. (1984). Issue management: Origins of the future. Stamford, CN: Issue Action Publications, Inc.
5.
CrableR. E.VibbertS. L. (1985). Managing issues and influencing public policy. Public Relations Review, 11, 3–16.
6.
DillonK. E.MarshH. W. (1981). Faculty earnings compared with those of nonacademic professionals. Journal of Higher Education, 52, 615–623.
7.
DozierD. M. (1989, May). Importance of the concept of symmetry and its presence in public relations practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the Public Relations Interest Group, International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
8.
DozierD. M. (1990). The innovation of research in public relations practice: Review of a program of studies. In GrunigJ. E.GrunigL. A. (Eds.), Public relations research annual (Vol. 2, pp. 3–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
DuttonJ. E.OttensmeyerE. (1987). Strategic issue management systems: Forms, functions, and contexts. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 355–365.
10.
GrunigJ. E. (1989). Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for public relations theory. In BotanC. H.HazeltonV.Jr. (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 17–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
GrunigJ. E. (Ed). (1992). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
GrunigJ. E.WhiteJ. (1991, August). The effect of worldview on public relations theory and practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the Public Relations Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
13.
GrunigJ. E.WhiteJ. (1992). The effect of worldviews on public relations theory and practice. In GrunigJ. E. (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 31–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
HainsworthB.MengM. (1988). How corporations define issue management. Public Relations Review, 14, 18–30.
15.
HeathR. L.NelsonR. A. (1986). Issues management: Corporate public policymaking in an information society. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
JonesB. L.ChaseW. H. (1979). Managing public policy issues. Public Relations Review, 5, 3–23.
17.
KearneyM. (1984). World view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
18.
LauzenM. M. (1994). Public relations practitioner role enactment in issues management. Journalism Quarterly, 71(2), 356–369.
19.
LauzenM. M.DozierD. M. (1994). Issues management mediation of linkages between environmental complexity and management of the public relations function. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(3), 163–184.
20.
NelsonR. A. (1990). Bias versus fairness: The social utility of issues management. Public Relations Review, 16, 25–81.
21.
NunnallyJ. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
SchwartzD. F.GlynnC. J.BreenD. (1990, June). Issues management and corporate public relations: Perceptions of corporate planners and public relations professionals. Paper presented to the Public Relations Interest Group, International Communication Association.
23.
TurkJ. V.RussellM. P. (1991, August). Teaching public relations management: Bringing “the ideal” and “the real” closer together. Paper presented to the Public Relations Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
24.
WakefieldG.CottoneL. P. (1992). Public relations executives' perceptions of disciplinary emphases important to public relations practice for the 1990s. Public Relations Review, 18 (1), 67–78.
25.
WartickS. L.RudeR. E. (1986). Issues management: Corporate fad or corporatefunction. California Management Review, 14 (1), 124–140.