AtkinsM. (1989, May 5). Visual stimulus. The Times Educational Supplement, p. B30.
2.
AtkinsonR. C. (1977). Teaching children to read using a computer. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.). Learning and instruction (pp. 570–585). Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
3.
BaileyZ. T. (1990). CAI and interactive video enhance students' scores on the college level academic skills test. T. H. E. Journal, 17(5), 82–85.
4.
BakerP. (1988, November 11). Interactive video — the made-to-measure medium: What's that?The Times Educational Supplement, p. 59.
5.
BaronA.Jr.HutchinsonJ. (1984). Interactive video: A promising technology for counseling services. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63 (4), 244–247.
6.
BrowningP.WhiteW. A. T.NaveG.BarkinP. Z. (1986). Interactive video in the classroom: A field study. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21 (2), 85–92.
7.
ColeG. (1988, November 25). Exploding on to the scene. The Times Educational Supplement, p. 35.
8.
CorcoranE. (1989, July). Science and business: Show and tell. Scientific American, pp. 72–74.
9.
DunnR.DunnK.PriceG. E. (1979). Identifying individual learning styles. In Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 39–54). Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
10.
EbnerD. G.ManningD. T.BrooksF. R.MahoneyJ. V.LippertH. T.BalsonP. M. (1984, September). Videodiscs can improve instructional efficiency. Instructional Innovator, 29, 26–28.
11.
FrenkelK. A. (1989). The next generation of interactive technologies. Communications of the ACM, 32 (7), 872–881.
12.
HudsonT. J. (1990, March). Computer-interactive media in video production education: Embracing the technology. Paper presented at the meeting of the Broadcast Education Association Convention, Atlanta, Georgia.
13.
HudsonT. J. (1991). Viewpoint: State of the art capabilities are necessary. Feedback, 32 (3), 20.
14.
JenkinsY. (1990). Multimedia technology: Tools for early learning. In AmbronS.HooperK. (Eds.). Interactive Multimedia (pp. 113–123). Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Press.
15.
KeefeJ. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
16.
LaurillardD. M. (1984, June). Interactive video and the control of learning. Educational Technology, 24, 7–14.
17.
MarchioniniG. (1988). Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos. Educational Technology, 28 (11), 8–12.
18.
MeyerR. (1984). Borrow this new military technology, and help win the war for kid's minds. American School Board Journal, 71 (6), 23–28.
19.
NannyM. (1990). Interactive images for education. In AmbronS.HooperK. (Eds.). Interactive Multimedia (pp. 87–98). Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Press.
20.
OsbornH. (1990). Media computers, motivation, and informal education: Gutenberg 2000? In AmbronS.HooperK. (Eds.). Interactive Multimedia (pp. 359–381). Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Press.
21.
PettyL. C.RosenE. F. (1987). Computer-based interactive video systems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19 (2), 160–166.
22.
RestakR. M. (1979). The other difference between boys and girls. In Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 75–80). Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
23.
SavenyeW. (1990, April). Developing interactive multi-media programs for teaching: Trends and issues. A colloquium sponsored by the Educational Technology Program Area and the Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Oklahoma.
24.
SchultzT.SchultzJ. (1989). Do it! Active learning in youth ministry.Loveland, Colorado: Group Books.
25.
Seal-WannerC. (1988). Interactive video systems: Their promise and educational potential. Teachers College Record, 89 (3), 373–383.
26.
SemperR. (1990). HyperCard and education: Reflections on the hyperboom. In AmbronS.HooperK. (Eds.). Interactive Multimedia (pp. 53–67). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
27.
VogelR. A.ShulmanG. M.JenischR. A. (1990). Teaching interactive video: A team approach. Feedback, 31 (2), 22–23.