This research explores journalism education in the context of AI’s disruptive influence, seeking strategies that balance technological skills with core humanistic values. Using a mixed-methods approach, including interviews with nine Spanish journalism professors and one Harvard expert, we analyzed qualitative data with NVivo and quantitative data with SPSS. Findings identify three main reform areas: integrating AI and transmedia competencies, reinforcing foundational journalistic skills, and restructuring curricula to enhance academia–industry collaboration. Experts advocate for what we call a techno-humanist, pyramid-shaped educational model that prioritizes practical training, critical thinking, and ethics. The study underscores the need for flexible, integrative, and active learning models in journalism education.
AgarwalD.NaamanM.VashisthaA. (2025). AI suggestions homogenize writing toward Western styles and diminish cultural nuances. arXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org/html/2409.11360v3
2.
American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 145–156.
BroersmaM.SingerJ. B. (2021). Caught between innovation and tradition: Young journalists as normative change agents in the journalistic field. Journalism Practice, 15(6), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1824125
6.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
DoddsT.VandendaeleA.SimonF. M.HelbergerN.ResendezV.YeungW. N. (2025b). Knowledge silos as a barrier to responsible AI practices in journalism? Exploratory evidence from four Dutch news organisations. Journalism Studies, 26(6), 740–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2025.2463589
10.
DoddsT.ZamithR.LewisS. C. (2025). The AI turn in journalism: Disruption, adaptation, and democratic futures. Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251343518
11.
Fernández BarreroM. A.López RedondoI.Aramburú MoncadaL. G. (2024). Possibilities and challenges of artificial intelligence in the teaching and learning process of journalism writing. The experience in Spanish universities. Communication & Society, 37(4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.4.241-256
12.
FinlayL. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973202129120052
13.
FrieseS. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti (3rd ed.). Sage.
14.
García-GaleraM.-C.Martínez-NicolásM.Del-Hoyo-HurtadoM. (2021). Innovation in journalism educational programmes at university. A systematic review of educational experiences at Spanish universities. Profesional de la Información, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.may.07
15.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
16.
Gómez-DiagoG. (2022). Perspectivas para abordar la inteligencia artificial en la enseñanza de periodismo. Una revisión de experiencias investigadoras y docentes. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 80, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2022-1542
17.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
18.
Gutiérrez-CanedaB.Vázquez-HerreroJ.López-GarcíaX. (2023). AI application in journalism: ChatGPT and the uses and risks of an emergent technology. Profesional de la Información, 32(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.14
19.
HuttoC.GilbertE. (2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550
20.
KatzenbergerV. (2024). Mind the gap: Re-thinking digital skills in journalism education in Germany. Media Practice and Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2024.2435805
21.
KirchhoffS. (2022). Journalism education’s response to the challenges of digital transformation: A dispositive analysis of journalism training and education programs. Journalism Studies, 23(1), 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2004555
22.
KosmynaN.HauptmannE.YuanY. T.SituJ.LiaoX.-H.BeresnitzkyA. V.BraunsteinI.MaesP. (2025). Your brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872
23.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage.
24.
Larrondo UretaA.CanavilhasJ.Fernandes TeixeiraJ.MartinsG. L.Meso AyerdiK.Peña FernándezS.Pérez DasilvaJ.ZamithF. (2020). Innovación educativa para la internacionalización y la convergencia de la enseñanza del ciberperiodismo en Iberoamérica. Anàlisi, 62, 35–56. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3264
25.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
26.
LopezosaC.CodinaL.Pont-SorribesC.VállezM. (2023). Uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la formación de los periodistas: Desafíos, usos y propuesta formativa. Profesional de la Información, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.jul.08
27.
MalterudK.SiersmaV. D.GuassoraA. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Mayo-CuberoM. (2024). Aplicación y principios éticos de la inteligencia artificial en medios audiovisuales: El caso de Sky News. Espejo de Monografías de Comunicaciónsocial, 25, 141–163. https://doi.org/10.52495/c6.emcs.25.p108
30.
McEneryT.HardieA. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
OlsenR. K.OlsenG. R.Røsok-DahlH. (2024). Unpacking value creation dynamics in journalism education. A COVID-19 case study. Journalism Practice, 18(3), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2043767
33.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
34.
PavlikJ. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 78(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
35.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
ScottM.TribbleC. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22
39.
SeverijnenM.de HaanY. (2024). Educating for a changing media landscape: Four scenarios for journalism education in 2030. Journalism Studies, 25(16), 1931–1948. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2406814
40.
SolkinL. (2020). Journalism education in the 21st century: A thematic analysis of the research literature. Journalism, 23(2), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920977299
41.
UsherN. (2016). Interactive journalism: Hackers, data and code. University of Illinois Press.
42.
VasileiouK.BarnettJ.ThorpeS.YoungT. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), Article 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
43.
VeenstraA. S.WilderM.ShimuF.SchlauderL.DousdebésF. (2024). Journalism students’ use, expectations, and understanding of generative AI tools. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 80(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958241296474
WilnerT.MuseH.CoddingtonM.García HernándezF.JohnsonP. R.McLemoreD.MuddimanA.RhodesS.SridharanN.AppelmanA.AssafC. T.BentleyJ.Núñez-MussaE.Green-BarberL.LewisS. C.Bélair-GagnonV.GolenJ.HoltonA.MahmoodR. (2024). The research-practice gap in journalism: Why it exists and how we can address it. Journalism Bridging Project & American Press Institute. https://www.journalismbridgingproject.com/white-paper
