Linking Media Instruction,Media Literacy,and Digital Skills to Fake News Beliefs and Censorship Support

Abstract

Arabic

Spanish

French

Chinese

This study explores the link between knowledge and skills related to online information consumption and implications for fake news beliefs and support for censorship. The goal of this project was to explore the link between media instruction and students’ news beliefs and attitudes. In particular, survey participants were asked about fake news beliefs, completed digital skill and media literacy assessments, and then completed a measure of their support for government censorship of media. Results indicate that more literate and more skilled users are more skeptical of news media reporting and are more supportive of censorship.

Keywords

media literacy censorship news survey internet/web/digital/online

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amazeen

M. A.

Bucy

E. P.

(2019). Conferring resistance to digital disinformation: The inoculating influence of procedural news knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1653101

Ashley

Maksl

Craft

(2013). Developing a news media literacy scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 68(1), 7–21.

Baek

Y. M.

Kang

Kim

(2019). Fake news should be regulated because it influences both “others” and “me”: How and why the influence of presumed influence model should be extended. Mass Communication and Society, 22(3), 301–323.

Bago

Rand

D. G.

Pennycook

(2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(8), 1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729

Bakker

T. P.

De Vreese

C. H.

(2011). Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38(4), 451–470.

Bronstein

M. V.

Pennycook

Bear

Rand

D. G.

Cannon

T. D.

(2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108–117.

Cheng

Chen

Z. F.

(2020). The influence of presumed fake news influence: Examining public support for corporate corrective response, media literacy interventions, and governmental regulation. Mass Communication and Society, 23(5), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1750656

Curnalia

R. M. L.

(2017). The news media lost at their own game: How @realDonaldTrump framed the “phony,” “fake,” and “failing” news media in his tweets about polls [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Dallas, TX, United States.

Drummond

Siegrist

Árvai

(2020). Limited effects of exposure to fake news about climate change. Environmental Research Communications, 2(8), Article 081003.

10.

Fishbein

Ajzen

(1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.

11.

Gerstmann

(2021, March 22). What is cancel culture? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/evangerstmann/2021/03/22/what-is-cancel-culture/?sh=766c969abd55

12.

Guess

A. M.

Nagler

Tucker

(2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), Article eaau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586

13.

Guess

A. M.

Lerner

Lyons

Montgomery

J. M.

Nyhan

Reifler

Sircar

(2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536–15545.

14.

Hall

(2007). Encoding and decoding television discourse. In Gray

Campbell

Erickson

Hall

Wood

(Eds.), CCCS selected working papers (pp. 386–398). Routledge. (Original work published 1974)

15.

Hameleers

(2022). Separating truth from lies: Comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands. Information, Communication & Society, 25, 110–126.

16.

Jang

S. M.

Kim

J. K.

(2018). Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 295–302.

17.

Jones-Jang

S. M.

Mortensen

Liu

(2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371–388.

18.

Kahne

Lee

N. J.

Feezell

J. T.

(2012). Digital media literacy education and online civic and political participation. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1–24.

19.

Kellner

(2005). Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 369–386.

20.

Kozol

(2011). Illiterate America. Doubleday Publishing.

21.

Ladd

J. M.

Podkul

A. R.

(2020). Sowing distrust of the news media as an electoral strategy. In Suhay

Grofman

Trechsel

A. H.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of electoral persuasion (pp. 427–454). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.013.17

22.

Lane

(2020). Cultivating distrust of the mainstream media: Propagandists for a liberal machine and the American establishment. In Nadler

Bauer

A. J.

(Eds.), News on the right: Studying conservative news cultures (p. 157–173). Oxford University Press.

23.

Lee

T. T.

(2010). Why they don’t trust the media: An examination of factors predicting trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(1), 8–21.

24.

Lee

T. T.

(2021). How people perceive influence of fake news and why it matters. Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2021.1954677

25.

Lopez

M. H.

Levine

Dautrich

Yalof

(2009). Schools, education policy, and the future of the First Amendment. Political Communication, 26(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802622910

26.

Martel

Pennycook

Rand

D. G.

(2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 1–20.

27.

Michael

R. B.

Breaux

B. O.

(2021). The relationship between political affiliation and beliefs about sources of “fake news.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 1–15.

28.

Mihailidis

Thevenin

(2013). Media literacy as a core competency for engaged citizenship in participatory democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1611–1622.

29.

Mossberger

(2009). Toward digital citizenship: Addressing inequality in the information age. In Chadwich

Howard

P. N.

(Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 173–185). Routledge.

30.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS). https://nces.ed.gov/statprog/handbook/pdf/nals.pdf

31.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Skills of U.S. unemployed, young, and older adults in sharper focus. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED565447.pdf

32.

Paek

H. J.

Lambe

J. L.

McLeod

D. M.

(2008). Antecedents to support for content restrictions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(2), 273–290.

33.

Park

(2012). Dimensions of digital media literacy and the relationship with social exclusion. Media International Australia, 142(1), 87–100.

34.

Pennycook

Epstein

Mosleh

Arechar

A. A.

Eckles

Rand

D. G.

(2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592, 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2

35.

Pennycook

Rand

D. G.

(2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007

36.

Perry

K. H.

Shaw

D. M.

Ivanyuk

Tham

Y. S.

(2018). The “Ofcourseness” of functional literacy: Ideologies in adult literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X17753262

37.

Potter

W. J.

(2010). The state of media literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(4), 675–696.

38.

Potter

W. J.

Thai

C. L.

(2019). Reviewing media literacy intervention studies for validity. Review of Communication Research, 7, 38–66. https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.018

39.

Roberts

Wahl-Jorgensen

(2020). Breitbart’s attacks on mainstream media: Victories, victimhood, and vilification. In Boler

Davis

(Eds.), Affective politics of digital media: Propaganda by other means (pp. 150–184). Taylor & Francis.

40.

Ross

A. S.

Rivers

D. J.

(2018). Discursive deflection: Accusation of “fake news” and the spread of mis-and disinformation in the tweets of President Trump. Social Media+ Society, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010

41.

Salwen

M. B.

(1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25(3), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025003001

42.

Shen

Kasra

Pan

Bassett

G. A.

Malloch

O’Brien

J. F.

(2019). Fake images: The effects of source, intermediary, and digital media literacy on contextual assessment of image credibility online. New Media & Society, 21(2), 438–463.

43.

Tong

Gill

Valenzuela

Rojas

(2020). “Fake news is anything they say!” Conceptualization and weaponization of fake news among the American public. Mass Communication and Society, 23(5), 755–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1789661

44.

Tsfati

Cappella

J. N.

(2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529.

45.

Tully

Maksl

Ashley

Vraga

E. K.

Craft

(2022). Defining and conceptualizing news literacy. Journalism, 23(8), 1589–1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211005888

46.

Tully

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

(2020). Designing and testing news literacy messages for social media. Mass Communication & Society, 23(1), 22–46. https://doi-org.eps.cc.ysu.edu/10.1080/15205436.2019.1604970

47.

Vallone

R. P.

Ross

Lepper

M. R.

(1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585.

48.

Van der Linden

Panagopoulos

Roozenbeek

(2020). You are fake news: Political bias in perceptions of fake news. Media, Culture & Society, 42(3), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720906992

49.

Van de Vord

(2010). Distance students and online research: Promoting information literacy through media literacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 170–175.

50.

Van Duyn

Collier

(2019). Priming and fake news: The effects of elite discourse on evaluations of news media. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807

51.

Vogel

E. A.

Anderson

(2019). Americans and digital knowledge. Pew Research Center: Internet and Technology. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/10/09/americans-and-digital-knowledge/

52.

Vraga

E. K.

Tully

Rojas

(2009). Media literacy training reduces perception of bias. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 68–81.