Understanding the profiles of communication students offers meaningful information for the design of satisfactory academic programs which enhance their skills and orientate their future professional careers. This research studies the relationship between creativity, personality, and relation to art of 126 Singaporean communication students. It gathers psychometric evidence for the K-DOCS, analyzes its relationship with personality, and proposes an orientation toward arts scale. Main results show that these students relate art to self/everyday, scholarly, and artistic creativity. Also, there is a link between their personality (agreeableness and openness) and creativity (self/everyday, scholarly, and artistic) in the relation to art.
ArmstrongP. I.AnthonyS. F. (2009). Personality facets and RIASEC interests: An integrated model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.004
4.
BateyM.FurnhamA. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430
5.
BeghettoR. A.CorazzaG. E. (Eds.). (2019). Dynamic perspectives on creativity. New directions for theory, research, and practice in education. Springer Nature.
6.
BodenM. A. (2011). Creativity and art: Three roads to surprise. Oxford University Press.
7.
ByrgeC.NúñezP. (2019). Think Piece: New perspectives for the role of creativity in Education. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 5, 104–108.
8.
Cohen. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
9.
DollingerS. J.UrbanK. K.JamesT. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_4
10.
DwyerC. P.HoganM. J.StewartI. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
11.
EganA.MaguireR.ChristophersL.RooneyB. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004
12.
FeistG. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
13.
GlaveanuV. P. (2011). Is the lightbulb still on? Social representations of creativity in a Western context. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 21(1), 53–72.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwith, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In MervieldeI.DearyI.De FruytF.OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
16.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
17.
HallerC. S.CourvoisierD. S. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017084
18.
HoagA.GrantA. E.CarpenterS. (2017). Impact of media on major choice: Survey of communication undergraduates. NACADA Journal, 37(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-15-040
19.
HockingD. (2018). Communicating creativity. The discursive facilitation of creativity in arts. Palgrave MacMillan.
20.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
21.
KandlerC.RiemannR.AngleitnerA.SpinathF. M.BorkenauP.PenkeL. (2016). The nature of creativity: The roles of genetic factors, personality traits, cognitive abilities, and environmental sources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000087
22.
KarwowskiM.LebudaI. (2016). The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000035
23.
KaufmanJ. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetic, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751
24.
KaufmanJ. C.PumaccahuaT. T.HoltR. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 93–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.013
25.
KingL. A.WalkerL. M.BroylesS. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 189–203.
26.
KratzerJ.LeendersO. T. A. J.van EngelenJ. M. L. (2004). Stimulating the potential: Creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00294.x
27.
LarsonL. M.RottinghausP. J.BorgenF. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1854
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999 findings). Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
30.
McCraeR. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1258–1263. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.52.6.1258
31.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
32.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd Ed.). Guilford Press.
33.
McStayA. (2013). Creativity and advertising: Affect, events and process. Routledge.
PatstonT. J.CropleyD. H.MarroneR. L.KaufmanJ. C. (2018). Teacher implicit beliefs of creativity: Is there an arts bias?Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.001
36.
PrabhuV.SuttonC.SauserW. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701841955
37.
PuryearJ. S.KettlerT.RinnA. (2017). Relating personality and creativity: Considering what and how we measure. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.174
38.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
39.
RomoM.Sánchez-RuizM. J.Alfonso-BenlliureV. (2017). Creatividad y personalidad a través de dominios: una revisión crítica [Creativity and personality across domains: A critical review]. Anuario de Psicología, 47, 64–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpsic.2017.04.003
40.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
41.
RuncoM. A. (2007). Encouraging creativity in education. In TanA. G. (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp. 7–9). World Scientific.
42.
RuncoM. A. (2018). Authentic creativity: Mechanisms, definitions, and empirical efforts. In SternbergR. J.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (pp. 246–263). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108185936.018
43.
SengT. C.AunT. S.MayC. S.HashimI. H. M. (2016). Factor structure and psychometric qualities of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale [Conference session]. International Conference on Education and Psychology (pp. 389–400), Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
ShimonakaY.NakazatoK. (2007). Creativity and factors affecting creative ability in adulthood and old age. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.55.2_231
46.
SilviaP. J.NusbaumE. C. (2012). What’s your major? College majors as markers of creativity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 22(2), 31–43.
47.
SilviaP. J.NusbaumE. C.BergC.MartinC.O’ConnorA. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, higher-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015
48.
SilviaP. J.WigertB.Reiter-PalmonR.KaufmanJ. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology Faculty Publication, 54. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/psychfacpub/54
49.
SilviaP. J.WintersteinB. P.WillseJ. T.BaronaC. M.CramJ. T.HessK. I.MartinezJ. L.RichardC. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68
50.
SnyderH. T.HammondJ. A.GrohmanM. G.Katz-BuonincontroJ. (2019). Creativity measurement in undergraduate students from 1984-2013: A systematic review. Psychology of Aesthetic, Creativity and the Arts, 13(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000228
51.
SnyderH. T.SowdenP. T.SilviaP. J.KaufmanJ. C. (2020). The creative self: Do people distinguish creative self-perceptions, efficacy, and personal identity. Psychology of Aesthetic, Creativity and the Arts, 15(4), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000317
52.
SternbergR. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.
53.
TejedorS.CerviL. (2017). Análisis de los estudios de Periodismo y Comunicación en las principales universidades del mundo. Competencias, objetivos y asignaturas [Analysis of the journalism and communication degree programmes of the world’s top-ranked universities. Competencies, objectives and subjects]. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 72, 1626–1647. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1238
54.
ViladrichC.Angulo-BrunetA.DovalE. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
