While several studies have examined the learning outcomes of student-run communications agencies, these studies have mostly been from the perspective of faculty advisors. Through in-depth interviews with student agency graduates, this study examined how current industry professionals perceive the benefits of their student agency experiences and how they applied those experiences to their professional careers. Graduates placed a high value on the real-world experience gained from student agencies, learning how a professional agency functions, and working with a diverse set of clients and people in team-based settings. Graduates also reported that their student agency involvement set them apart in job interviews and made them better prepared than their peers for entry-level positions.
AttanseyM.OkigboC.SchmidtM. (2008). Preparing PR students for the brave new world: Students’ perceptions of problem-based learning. Public Relations Quarterly, 52(2), 29-37.
2.
BeachboardM. R.WeidmanL. M. (2013). Client-centered skill sets: What small IMC agencies need from college graduates. Journal of Advertising Education, 17(2), 28-38.
3.
BronsteinC.FitzpatrickK. R. (2015). Preparing tomorrow’s leaders: Integrating leadership development in journalism and mass communication education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 70, 75-88.
4.
BuschA. M. (2013). A professional project surveying student-run advertising and public relations agencies at institutions with AEJMC accredited programs (Thesis and Professional Projects from the College of Journalism and Mass Communications, Paper, 35, pp. 1-75). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&;context=journalismdiss
5.
BushL. (2009). Student public relations agencies: A qualitative study of the pedagogical benefits, risks and a framework for success. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 64, 27-38.
6.
BushL.MillerM. (2011). U.S. student-run agencies: Organization, attributes and advisor perceptions of student learning outcomes. Public Relations Review, 37, 485-491.
7.
CookeL.WilliamsS. (2004). Using client projects in the classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 139-152.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquire and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
DiStasoM. W.StacksD. W.BotanC. H. (2009). State of public relations education in the United States: 2006 report on a national survey of executives and academics. Public Relations Review, 35, 254-269.
10.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
11.
HaleyE.TaylorR.MorrisonM. (2014). How advertising creatives define excellent planning. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 35, 167-189.
12.
HanneyR. (2005). Work-based learning and problem-based learning. Journal of Media Practice, 6, 105-112.
13.
Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling short? College learning and career success: Selected findings from online surveys of employers and college students conducted on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/leap/public-opinion-research/2015-survey-results
14.
HopkinsC. D.RaymondM. A.CarlsonL. (2011). Educating students to give them a competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 337-347.
McCrackenG. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
17.
PavlikJ. V. (2013). A vision for transformative leadership: Rethinking journalism and mass communication education for the twenty-first century. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 68, 211-221.
18.
QuintanillaK. M.WahlS. T. (2005). Incorporating service learning into communication courses: Benefits, guidelines and challenges. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 30, 67-97.
The Report on the Commission on Public Relations Education. (2006, November). The professional bond: Public relations education for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.commpred.org/theprofessionalbond/index.php
21.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
SwansonD. J. (2011). The student-run public relations firm in an undergraduate program: Reaching learning and professional development goals through real-world experience. Public Relations Review, 37, 499-505.
23.
TaylorR.HoyM. G.HaleyE. (1996). How French advertising professionals develop creative strategy. The Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 1-14.
24.
ToddV. (2009). PRSSA faculty and professional advisors’ perceptions of public relations curriculum, assessment of students’ learning, and faculty performance. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 64, 71-90.
25.
WestJ. J.SimmonsD. (2011). Giving students the competitive edge: Selecting clients for client based projects. Journal of Advertising Education, 15(2), 35-39.
26.
WindelsK.MalliaK. L.BroylesS. J. (2013). Soft skills: The difference between leading and leaving the advertising industry. Journal of Advertising Education, 17(2), 17-27.
