Prior scholastic journalism research did not adequately address the possibility that journalism students perform better academically because of their backgrounds and inherent abilities. Using Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 data, this study shows that high school journalism attracts better students. Although for-credit and extracurricular programs differentiate journalism student characteristics, journalism students generally tend to have greater English self-efficacy, higher English grade point average, greater involvement in schools, be female and White, or have a higher socioeconomic background than those who do not participate in journalism. Future assessments of journalism’s contribution to academic achievement should account for students’ pre-journalism characteristics.
AlemánS. M. (2014). Locating whiteness in journalism pedagogy. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31, 72-88. doi:10.1080/15295036.2013.808355
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BeckerL. B.HanJ. Y.WilcoxD.VladT. (2014). The effects of pre-university study of journalism on entry to the job market. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91, 344-356. doi:10.1177/1077699014527458
4.
BobkowskiP. S.GoodmanM.BowenC. P. (2012). Student media in U.S. secondary schools: Associations with school demographic characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 67, 252-266. doi:10.1177/1077695812444699
5.
BrohB. A. (2002). Linking extracurricular programming to academic achievement: Who benefits and why?Sociology of Education, 75, 69-91. doi:10.2307/3090254
6.
BruschkeJ.GeorgeM. H. (1999). Verbal skills and the value of scholastic journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 54(3), 65-72. doi:10.1177/107769589905400305
7.
CarnevaleA. P.RoseS. J. (2003). Socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and selective college admissions. New York, NY: Century Foundation.
8.
ClarkL. S.MonserrateR. (2011). High school journalism and the making of young citizens. Journalism, 12, 417-432. doi:10.1177/1464884910388225
9.
DvorakJ.BowenC. P.ChoiC. (2009). Minority journalism student academic comparisons between those with and those without high school print media experience. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 64, 258-272. doi:10.1177/107769580906400303
10.
DvorakJ.ChoiC. (2009). High school journalism, academic performance correlate. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(3), 75-89.
11.
DvorakJ.LainL.DicksonT. (1994). Journalism kids do better: What research tells us about high school journalism. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication: EDINFO Press.
12.
EngbergM. E.WolniakG. C. (2010). Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 51, 132-153. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9150-y
13.
FeingoldA. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95-103. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.2.95
14.
FejginN. (1994). Participation in high school competitive sports: A subversion of school mission or contribution to academic goals?Sociology of Sport Journal, 11, 211-230.
15.
FeldmanA. F.MatjaskoJ. L. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75, 159-210. doi:10.3102/00346543075002159
16.
FeldmanA. F.MatjaskoJ. L. (2007). Profiles and portfolios of adolescent school-based extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 313-332. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.03.004
17.
FinnJ. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142. doi:10.3102/00346543059002117
18.
FredricksJ. A.BlumfieldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
19.
GeiserS.StudleyR. E. (2004). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I. and SAT II at the University of California. In ZwickR. (Ed.), Rethinking the SAT: The future of standardized testing in university admissions (pp. 125-152). New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
20.
GoodmanM.BowenC. P.BobkowskiP. S. (2011). The scholastic journalism census. Kent, OH: Center for Scholastic Journalism.
21.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
HayesA. F. (2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32, 385-410. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00281.x
23.
HonakerJ.KingG. (2010). What to do about missing values in time series cross-section data. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 561-581. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x
24.
IngelsS. J.PrattD. J.AlexanderC. P.JewellD. M.LauffE.MattoxT. L.. . . ChristopherE. (2014). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002) Third follow-up data file documentation (NCES 2014–364). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
IngelsS. J.PrattD. J.RogersJ. E.SiegelP. H.StuttsE. S.OwingsJ. A. (2004). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base year data file user’s manual (NCES 2004-405). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26.
Journalism Education Association. (1987). High school journalism confronts critical deadline: A report by the Journalism Education Association Commission on the role of journalism in secondary education. Manhattan, KS: Author.
27.
LucasS. M. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
MarchiR. (2012). From disillusion to engagement: Minority teen journalists and the news media. Journalism, 13, 750-765. doi:10.1177/1464884911431379
29.
MorganL.DvorakJ. (1994). Impact of journalism instruction on language arts in Alaskan schools. Journalism Educator, 49(3), 15-19. doi:10.1177/107769589404900302
30.
OakesJ.LiptonM. (1990). Tracking and ability grouping: A structural barrier to access and achievement. In GoodlandJ. I.KeatingP. (Eds.), Access to knowledge: An agenda for our nation’s schools (pp. 187-204). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
31.
PajaresF. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 139-158. doi:10.1080/10573560308222
32.
PajaresF.JohnsonM. J.UsherE. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 104-120. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40171749
33.
PajaresF.SchunkD. H. (2001). Self-beliefs in school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In RidingR. J.RaynerS. G. (Eds.), Self perception: International perspectives on individual differences (pp. 239-268). Westport, CT: Ablex.
34.
PopeD. G.SydnorJ. R. (2010). Geographic variation in the gender differences in test scores. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 95-108. doi:10.1257/jep.24.2.95
35.
SackettP. R.KuncelN. R.AmesonJ. J.CooperS. R.WatersS. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance?Psychological Bulletin, 135, 1-22. doi:10.1037/a0013978
36.
SchmidtW. H.McKnightC. C. (2012). Inequality for all: The challenge of unequal opportunity in American schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37.
SchunkD. H.MullenC. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieK. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219-235). New York, NY: Springer.
38.
VoelklK. E. (2012). School identification. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieK. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 193-218). New York, NY: Springer.
