In-depth qualitative interviews with participants of a high school journalism workshop reveal that immersing students in coverage of a historically important news event enhances learning of multimedia journalism. Study explores how using a team-based approach to coverage of the 50th anniversary of Freedom Summer, a key event in Mississippi’s civil rights history, bolsters students’ ability to learn to tell stories using text, photos, video, social media, radio, and blogs. Ramifications for multimedia education are proposed.
AlexandraD. (2008). Digital storytelling as transformative practice: Critical analysis and creative expression in the representation of migration in Ireland. Journal of Media Practice, 9, 101-112.
2.
BanduraA. (1971). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
3.
BanduraA. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In BryantJ.OliverM., Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 94-124). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BockM. A. (2011). You really, truly, have to “be there”: Video journalism as a social and material construction. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 705-718.
5.
BoersR.ErcanE.RinsdorfL.VaaganR. W. (2012). From convergence to connectivism: Teaching journalism 2.0. Online Journal of Communication & Media Technologies, 2(4), 52-64.
6.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BorS. E. (2014). Teaching social media journalism: Challenges and opportunities for future curriculum design. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 69, 243-255.
8.
BrechinA.SidellM. (2000). Ways of knowing. In GommR.DaviesC. (Eds.), Using evidence in health and social care (pp. 3-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
BrunerJ. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BullA. (2010). Multimedia journalism: A practical guide. London, England: Routledge.
11.
CassellJ. (1977). The relationship observer to observed in peer group research. Human Organization, 36, 412-416.
12.
ChockT. M.WolfJ.ChenG. M.SchweisbergerV. N.WangY. (2013). Social media features attract college students to news websites. Newspaper Research Journal, 34(4), 96-108.
13.
CrouchM.McKenzieH. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45, 483-499.
14.
DawsonK. W. (2014). The digital reporter. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
15.
DeuzeM. (2004). What is multimedia journalism?Journalism Studies, 5, 139-152.
16.
DeweyJ. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: The Free Press.
17.
DownsE.BoysonA. R.AlleyH.BloomN. R. (2011). iPedagogy: Using multimedia learning theory to iDentify best practices for MPC player use in higher education. Journal of Applied Communication, 39, 184-200.
18.
DunawayM. K. (2011). Connectivism: Learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, 39, 675-685.
19.
HaleJ. (2011). “The student as a force for social change”: The Mississippi freedom schools and student engagement. The Journal of African American History, 96, 325-347.
20.
HanG.NewellJ. (2014). Enhancing student learning in knowledge-based courses: Integrating team-based learning in mass communication theory classes. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 69, 180-196.
21.
HartA. (2001). Research media education in English. Research in Education, 66, 28-39.
22.
HoagA. M.JayakarK. P.EricksonK. (2003). The role of trust in virtual and interpersonal environments: Implications for team learning and case method pedagogies. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 57, 370-383.
23.
HongS. (2012). Online news on Twitter: Newspapers’ social media adoption and their online readership. Information Economics and Policy, 24, 69-74.
24.
HuangE. (2007). Use of rich media differs at newspapers, TV web sites. Newspaper Research Journal, 28(3), 85-97.
25.
HuangH. M. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 27-37.
26.
JenkinsH. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.
27.
JohnsonK. (2000). Interpreting meanings. In GommR.DaviesC. (Eds.), Using evidence in health and social care (pp. 64-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
LatherP. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
MathesonD. (2004). Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: Some trends in online journalism. New Media & Society, 6, 443-468.
30.
MayerR. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In MayerR.E. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 43-71). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MayerR. E.MorenoR. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Education Psychology, 90, 312-320.
32.
McCrackenG. D. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
33.
MichaelsenL. K. (1992). Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. To Improve the Academy, 11, 107-122.
34.
MontgomeryS. M. (1995). Addressing diverse learning styles through the use of multimedia. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference of the IEEE, 1, 2-13.
35.
OliverW. M. (2011). Crime, history, and Hollywood: Learning criminal justice history through major motion pictures. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 420-439.
36.
PrenskyM. (2006). Don’t bother me mom—I’m learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
RitchieJ.LewisJ.NichollsC. M.OrmstonR. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
