This case study focusing on journalism curriculum in Tennessee sheds light on the obstacles that journalism schools face in efforts to include more instruction of sunshine laws into courses. Journalists use these laws to gather information to write their stories, either by attending public meetings or by filing open records requests. This study identified three issues—curriculum structure, faculty background, and ongoing sunshine law developments—as emergent themes that may pose similar concerns for journalism educators elsewhere. Pedagogical recommendations also are offered.
ArwoodJ. M. (1993, August). What editors and educators say about news-editorial education: Toward a curriculum that responds to change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City, MO.
2.
AumanA. E.CookB. D. (1995, August). Preparing students to work on newspaper copy desks: Are educators meeting editors’ expectations?Paper presented in the Newspaper Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication for the annual convention, Washington, DC.
3.
DayN. (2002, Winter). What journalism schools do best. Nieman Reports, 56(4), 108-109.
4.
DeuzeM. (2001). Educating “new” journalists: Challenges to the curriculum. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 56(1), 4-17.
5.
DicksonT.BrandonW. (2000). The gap between educators and professional journalists. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 55(3), 50-67.
StepanekS. (2012). The logic of experience: An historical study in the halting birth and subsequent life of open meeting law in Iowa. Drake Law Review, 60, 497-559.
