This article presents findings from a pilot study of postgraduate journalism students in Dublin and Amman. The study compared professional outlooks and social characteristics of students in both contexts and examined institutional settings. The study finds that journalism students in Dublin and Amman have very similar views on the profession, although the students in Amman have a somewhat more activist outlook and less of a commitment to neutral or objective reporting; they also appear modestly more interested in effecting political and social change. We believe this has significant implications for journalism education across the region and for cross-cultural exchanges.
HallinD.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
HallinD.ManciniP. (2011). Comparing media systems beyond the western world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
HanitzschT. (2008). Comparing journalism across cultural boundaries: State of the art, strategies, problems and solutions. In LöffelholzM.WeaverD. (Eds.), Global journalism research: Theories, methods, findings, future (pp. 93-105). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7.
HanitzschT.BerganzaR. (2012). Explaining journalists’ trust in public institutions across 20 countries: Media freedom, corruption and ownership matter most. Journal of Communication, 62, 794-814.
8.
HanitzschT.MelladoC. (2011). What shapes the news around the world? How journalists in 18 countries perceive influences on their work. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16, 404-426.
9.
HusbandC. (2005). Minority ethnic media as communities of practice: Professionalism and identity politics in interaction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 461-479.
10.
KovachB.RosensteilT. (2007). The elements of journalism. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
11.
KraidyM. M. (2011). The rise of transnational media systems: Implications of pan-Arab media for comparative research. In HallinD. C.ManciniP. (Eds.), Beyond the western world (pp. 177-200). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
MellorN. (2005). The making of Arab news. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
O’DonnellP. (2006). Journalism students and intergenerational change in journalism. Australian Journalism Review, 28, 23-42.
15.
PintakL. (2011). The new Arab journalist: Mission and identity in time of turmoil. New York, NY: Tauris.
16.
PintakL.GingesJ. (2008). The mission of Arab journalism. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 193-227.
17.
PlaisanceP. L.SkewesE. A.HanitzschT. (2012). Ethical orientations of journalists around the globe: Implications from a cross-national survey. Communication Research, 39, 641-661.
18.
PrestonP. (2009). Making the news: Journalism and news cultures in Europe. London, England: Routledge.
RughW. A. (1979). The Arab press. New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.
21.
RughW. A. (2004). Arab mass media. New York, NY: Praeger.
22.
SchudsonM. (2000). The sociology of news production revisited (again). In CurranJ.GurevitchM. (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 175-200). London, England: Arnold.
23.
SiebertF.PetersonT.SchrammW. (1956). Four theories of the press. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
24.
SparksC. (1998). Communism, capitalism and the mass media. London, England: SAGE.
25.
WardS. (2004). Invention of journalism ethics: The path to objectivity and beyond. Montreal, Canada: McGill.
