BarabS.DuffyT. (2000). From practice fields to community practice. In JonassenD.LandS. M., Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments.Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
BarabS.SquireK.DueberW. (1999). Supporting Authenticity through Participatory Learning. Unpublished manuscript.
3.
BeardJ. D.RymerJ.WilliamsD. L. (1989). An assessment system for collaborative-writing groups: Theory and empirical evaluation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3(2), 29–51.
4.
BelangerK.GreerJ. (1992). Beyond the group project: A blueprint for a collaborative writing course. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6(1), 99–115.
5.
BrownJ.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
6.
ColeM.EngestromY. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In SalomonG., Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Cognition Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 2–10.
8.
Cognition Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1993). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Technology, 33, 52–70.
9.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and Education.New York: Macmillan.
10.
DobosJ. A. (1996). Collaborative learning: Effects of student expectations and communication apprehension on student motivation. Communication Education, 45, 118–134.
11.
DuffyT.CunninghamD. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In JonassenD., Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 170–198). New York: Macmillan.
12.
DuffyT.JonassenD. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In DuffyT.JonassenD., Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
DuinA. H. (1991). Computer-supported collaborative writing: The workplace and the writing classroom. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 5(2), 123–150.
14.
EvansF. (1976). What research says about grading. In SimonS. B.BellancaJ. A., Degrading the Grading Myths: A Primer of alternatives to grades and marks (pp. 30–50). Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
15.
FormanJ. (1991). Collaborative business writing: A Burkean perspective for future research. The Journal of Business Communication, 28(3), 233–257.
16.
FranzC. R.JinK. G. (1995). The structure of group conflict in a collaborative work group during information system development. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 108–127.
17.
HaberM. W. (1994). Strategies of collaborative writing and intellectual enrichment. Journalism Educator, 48(4), 47–53.
18.
HmeloC.EvensenD. (2000). Introduction, Problem-Based Learning: Gaining Insights on Learning Interactions Through Multiple Methods of Inquiry. In EvensenD.HmeloC., Problem-Based Learning: A Research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
HoweK.BervJ. (2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In PhillipsD., Constructivism in Education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 19–40). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
20.
JonassenD. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In ReigeluthC., Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume II: A New paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215–239). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
KellyJ. D.MurrieM. (1995, August). The effects of collaborative learning techniques on student learning and attitudes toward mass communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, D.C.
22.
KornegayV. (1991). How teaching informs research in graphics field experience. Journalism Educator, 46(1), 38–45.
23.
KuhnT. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolution.Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
24.
LaveJ. (1997). The culture of acquisition and practice of understanding. In KirshnerD.WhitsonJ. A., Situated Cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 63–82). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
LayM. M. (1989). Interpersonal conflict in collaborative writing: What we can learn from gender studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3(2), 5–28.
26.
MayerR. (1999) Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In ReigeluthC., Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume II: A New paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 141–159). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
PalmerP. (1998). The Courage to Teach.San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.
28.
PerkinsD. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In SalomonG., Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PhillipsD. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12.
30.
PhillipsD. C. (2000). An opinionated account of the constructivist landscape. In PhillipsD., Constructivism in Education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 1–16). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
PoindexterP. M. (1998). A model for effective teaching and learning in research methods. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 52(4), 24–36.
32.
RichC. (1997). Writing and Reporting News: A Coaching method.Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Pub. Co.
33.
SafersteinB. (1992). Collective cognition and collaborative work: The effects of cognitive and communicative processes on the organization of television production. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 61–86.
34.
SaveryJ.DuffyT. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.
35.
SchmidtH.MoustJ. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A Review of research. In EvensenD.HmeloC., Problem-Based Learning: A Research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 19–51). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36.
SchoenfeldA. (1996). In fostering communities of inquiry, must it matter that the teacher knows the “answer”?For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(3), 11–16.
37.
SteinerG. (1997). Educational learning theory. In TennysonR.SchottF.SeelN.DijkstraS., Instructional Design: International Perspectives. Volume 1: Theory, Research, and Models (pp. 41–53). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38.
StewartD. C. (1988). Collaborative learning and composition: Boon or bane?Rhetoric Review, 7(1), 58–83.
39.
TennysonR. (1997). Research foundations for instructional design: Introduction and overview. In TennysonR.SchottF.SeelN.DijkstraS., Instructional Design: International Perspectives. Volume 1: Theory, Research, and Models (pp. 177–182). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
TennysonR.SchottF. (1997) Instructional design theory, research, and models. In TennysonR.SchottF.SeelN.DijkstraS., Instructional Design: International Perspectives. Volume 1: Theory, Research, and Models (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
WallaceD. L. (1994). Collaborative planning and transforming knowledge. The Journal of Business Communication, 31(1), 41–60.