Irresponsible Testimony by Medical Experts in Cases Involving the Physical Abuse and Neglect of Children

Abstract

Irresponsible testimony by medical experts is a growing problem exemplified by three particularly egregious cases reported herein. The types of irresponsible testimony include the witness's absence of proper qualifications, use of unique theories of causation, use of unique or very unusual interpretations of medical findings, alleging nonexistent medical findings, flagrant misquoting of medical journals or widely used texts, making false statements, and deliberate omission of pertinent facts or knowledge. Criteria to qualify as an expert witness in child abuse and neglect are proposed. Finally, physicians, lawyers, and their respective professional licensing boards and societies are urged to develop a process by which such testimony is exposed, peer reviewed, and used in credentialing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Medical Liability . (1989). Guidelines for expert witness testimony. Pediatrics, 83, 312-313.

Brent, R. L. (1982). The irresponsible expert witness: A failure of biomedical graduate education and professional accountability. Pediatrics, 70, 754-762.

Chadwick, D. L. (1990). Preparation for court testimony in child abuse cases. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 37, 955-970.

Diamond, B. L. (1959). The fallacy of the impartial expert. Arch Criminal Psychodynamics, Spring, 221-236.

Diamond, B. L. (1988). The psychiatric expert witness: Honest advocate or “hired gun.” In R. Weinstock & R. Rosner (Eds.), Critical issues in American psychiatry and the law, vol. 7, Ethical issues in psychiatry and the law. New York: Plenum.

Jones, K. L. (1997). Smith's recognizable patterns of human malformation (5th ed.). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

Leestma, J. E. (1988). Forensic neuropathology, New York: Raven.

Lynch, R. E. (1990). Ionized calcium: Pediatric perspective. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 37, 373-389.

Okerblom, J. , & Wilkens, J. (1994, October 23). Woman still determined to prove ex-beau innocent of murdering her toddler. San Diego Union, p. 1.

10.

Ophoven, J. J. (1992). Forensic pathology. In J. T. Stocker & L. P. Dehner (Eds.), Pediatric pathology (pp. 257-324). Philadelphia: J. B. Lipponcott.

11.

Robbins, S. L. , & Cotran, R. S. (Eds). (1989). Nutritional disease. In Pathologic basis of disease (2nd ed., pp. 435-468). New York: W. B. Saunders.

12.

Rosai, J. , & Levine, G. D. (1975). Tumors of the thymus. AFIP Fascicle 13, Second Series (pp. 17-25). Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

13.

Stocker, J. T. , & Dehner, L. P. (Eds.). (1992). Pediatric pathology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.

14.

Van Vaarlen, J. , Schuurman, H. J. , & Huber,J. (1988). Acute thymus involution in infancy and childhood: A reliable marker for duration of acute illness. Human Pathology, 19, 1155-1160.

15.

Weintraub, M. I. (1995). Expert witness testimony: A time for self-regulation. Neurology, 45, 855-858.

16.

Zaloga, G. P. , & Chernow, B. (1986). Hypocalcemia in critical illness. Journal of the American Medical Association, 256, 1924-1929.