Current Trends in Children's Legal Representation

Abstract

Over the past quarter of a century, the legal representation of children has matured into a recognized subspecialty, complete with its own professional organizations, literature, continuing education, jurisprudence, and emerging ethical consensus. The trend has been away from a subjectively based, paternalistic, guardian ad litem model to a more traditional, client-directed, advocacy model. There continues to be recognition of the special duties owed to child clients, with the resulting need for multidisciplinary education and consultation and a more informed, objective method for determining the legal position of children who cannot or will not provide appropriate direction to their lawyers. This article discusses the historical development of child advocacy and the current standards and recommendations applicable to children's lawyers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Bar Association (ABA) . (1969). Model code of professional responsibility. Chicago: Author.

American Bar Association (ABA) . (1983). Model rules of professional conduct. Chicago: Author.

American Bar Association (ABA) . (1996). Standards of practice for lawyers who represent children in abuse and neglect cases. Chicago: Author.

Arizona v. Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).

Ark. Code Ann. §9-27-316(e) (1) (1995).

Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code §317(c) (1996).

Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 42 U.S.C. §5106a(b)(6) (1988).

Duquette, D. (1990). Advocating for the child in protection proceedings: A handbook for lawyers and court appointed special advocates. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Duquette, D. (1992). Child protection legal process: Comparing the United States and Great Britain. Pittsburgh Law Review, 54(1), 239-294.

10.

Federle, K. H. (1996). The ethics of empowerment: Rethinking the role of lawyers in interviewing and counseling the child client. Fordham Law Review, 64(4), 1655-1697.

11.

Guggenheim M. (1996) A paradigm for determining the role of counsel for children. Fordham Law Review 64(4), 1399-1433.

12.

Haralambie, A. M. (1993). The child's attorney: A guide to representing children in custody, adoption, and protection cases. Chicago: American Bar Association.

13.

Haralambie, A. M. , & Glaser, D. L. (1995). Practical and theoretical problems with the AAML standards for representing “impaired” children. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 13(1), 57-94.

14.

Ichikawa, D. P. (1997). An argument on behalf of children. Child Maltreatment, 2(3), 202-211.

15.

Jacobs, T. (1995). Children and the law: Rights and obligations. Deerfield, IL: Clark Boardman Callaghan.

16.

Margulies, P. (1996). The lawyer as caregiver: Child client's competence in context. Fordham Law Review, 64(4), 1473-1504.

17.

National Association of Counsel for Children (NACC) . (1997). Deskbook and directory. Denver: Author.

18.

Peters, J. K. (1997a). The lawyer in the interdisciplinary meeting. Child Maltreatment, 2(3), 226-244.

19.

Peters, J. K. (1997b). Representing children in child protective proceedings: Context, ethics and practice. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.

20.

Recommendations of the Conference on Ethical Issues in the Legal Representation of Children . (1996). Fordham Law Review, 64(4), 1301-1323.

21.

Weinberg, L. A. , Weinberg, C. , & Shea, N. M. (1997). Advocacy's role in identifying dysfunctions in agencies serving abused and neglected children. Child Maltreatment, 2(3), 212-225.