Many benefits have been attributed to multidisciplinary team (MDT) approaches used in the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect. Yet more than a decade has passed since the nature and characteristics of MDTs have been examined. Findings presented in this article suggest that MDTs vary according to configuration, legislation, function, composition, and training. Current approaches are distinctive when compared with approaches found in previous national surveys. Specifically, the past 10 years have been characterized by the creation of a variety of MDT configurations, a dramatic expansion of legislation permitting or mandating MDT use, an increased diversity of MDT functions, a broader spectrum of discipline representation on MDTs, and an augmented use of training to implement and maintain MDTs. Results described here enable comparison with previous national surveys to shed light on the evolution of MDT system design and to suggest an agenda for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amacher, E.
, Cramer, R. E., Jr., Hall, K. K., & Lind, J. (1990). The best practices manual of children's advocacy centers. Huntsville, AL: National Children's Advocacy Center.
2.
American Humane Association
. (1979). Child protective services entering the 1980s. Englewood, CO: Author.
3.
American Prosecutors Research Institute
. (1993). Investigation and prosecution of child abuse (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
4.
American Prosecutors Research Institute
. (1994). Legislation mandating or authorizing the creation of multidisciplinary/multiagency child protection teams. Alexandria, VA: Author.
5.
Berthier, M.
, Oriot, D., Bonneau, J., Chevrel, G., Magnin, G., & Garnier, P. (1993). Failure to prevent physical child abuse despite detection of risk factors at birth and social work follow-up. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17, 691-692.
6.
Besharov, D. J.
(1988). Protecting children from abuse and neglect. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
7.
Burt, M. R.
, & Pittman, K. J. (1985). Testing the social safety net: The impact of changes in support programs during the Reagan administration. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
8.
California Attorney General's Office
. (1994). Child victim witness investigative pilot projects: Research and evaluation final report. Washington, DC: Author.
9.
Chadwick, D. L.
(1996). Community organization of services needed to deal with child abuse. In J. Briere, L. Berliner, J. A. Bulkley, C. Jenny, & T. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (pp. 398-408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Cohn, A. H.
(1982). Organization and administration of programs to treat child abuse and neglect. In E. H. Newberger (Ed.), Child abuse (pp. 89-103). Boston: Little, Brown.
11.
Dinsmore, J.
(1992-1993). A safety net of bridges: Interagency coordination on child abuse investigations. Part I. National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse Update, 5-6(12-1), 1-2.
12.
Faller, K. C.
(1985). Unanticipated problems in the United States child protection system. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9, 63-69.
13.
Goldstein, J.
, & Griffin, E. (1993). The use of physician-social worker team in the evaluation of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2, 85-95.
14.
Gray, J.
, & Fryer, G. E. (1991). Physician assistants as members of social service child protection units. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 415-421.
15.
Hochstadt, N. J.
, & Harwicke, N. J. (1985). How effective is the multidisciplinary approach? A follow-up study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9, 365-372.
16.
Jones, D. P.
(1991). Professional and clinical challenges to protection of children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 57-66.
17.
Kaminer, B. B.
, Crowe, A. H., & Budde-Giltner, L. (1988). The prevalence and characteristics of multidisciplinary teams for child abuse and neglect: A national survey. In D. C. Bross, R. Krugman, M. Lenherr, D. Rosenberg, & B. Schmitt (Eds.), The new child protection team handbook (pp. 548-567). New York: Garland.
18.
Kolbo, J. R.
, Lowe, E., Wood, M. B., Efaw, B., & Strong, E. (1994). Children's justice task force: A report on multidisciplinary team approaches to the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect. Charleston: West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources.
19.
Krugman, R. D.
(1988). Future challenges for child protection teams: Research, education, advocacy. In D. C. Bross, R. Krugman, M. Lenherr, D. Rosenberg, & B. Schmitt (Eds.), The new child protection team handbook (pp. 616-624). New York: Garland.
20.
Meddin, J.
, & Hansen, I. (1985). The services provided during a child abuse and-or neglect case investigation and the barriers that exist to service provision. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9, 175-182.
21.
Mercer, S. O.
, & Perdue, J. D. (1993). Munchausen Syndrome by proxy: Social work's role. Social Work, 38, 74-81.
22.
Meriwhether, M. H.
(1988). Child abuse reporting laws: Time for change. In D. J. Besharov (Ed.), Protecting children from abuse and neglect (pp. 9-45). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
23.
National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect
. (1992). Children's justice act grant program: A report to congress on state programs for the investigation and prosecution of child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse
. (1995). Current trends in child abuse reporting and fatalities: The results of the 1994 annual fifty-state survey. Chicago: Author.
25.
Pardess, E.
, Finzi, R., & Sever, J. (1993). Evaluating the best interests of the child—A model of multidisciplinary teamwork. Medicine and Law, 12, 205-211.
26.
Pence, D.
, & Wilson, C. (1994). Team investigation of child sexual abuse: The uneasy alliance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Pettiford, E. K.
(1981). Improving child protective services through the use of multidisciplinary teams. Washington, DC: National Professional Resource Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Public Welfare Association and National Association of Social Workers.
28.
Roane, T. H.
(1992). Male victims of sexual abuse: A case review within a child protective team. Child Welfare, 71, 231-239.
29.
Rogan, M. S.
(1990). The multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. In S. M. Stith, M. B. Williams, & K. Rosen (Eds.), Violence hits home: Comprehensive treatment approaches to domestic violence (pp. 105-114). New York: Springer.
30.
Salovitz, B.
, & Keys, D. (1988). Is child protective service still a service?Protecting Children, 5, 17-23.
31.
Sas, L.
(1991). Reducing the system-induced trauma for child sexual abuse victims through court preparation, assessment and follow-up. London, Ontario: London Family Court Clinic.
32.
Sas, L.
(1993). Three years after the verdict: A longitudinal study of the social and psychological adjustment of child witnesses referred to the child witness project. London, Ontario: London Family Court Clinic.
33.
Saywitz, K. J.
, & Goodman, G. S. (1996). Interviewing children in and out of court: Current research and practice implications. In J. Briere, L. Berliner, J. A. Bulkley, C. Jenny, & T. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (pp. 297-318). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Selinske, J.
(1981). A survey of the use and functioning of multidisciplinary teams in child protective services. Washington, DC: National Professional Resource Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Public Welfare Association.
35.
Skaff, L. F.
(1988). Child maltreatment coordinating committees for effective service delivery. Child Welfare, 67, 217-230.
36.
Tedesco, J.
, & Shell, S. (1987). Children's reactions to sex abuse: Investigation and litigation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 267-272.
37.
U.S. Department of Justice
. (1996). Fiscal Year 1996 Discretionary Competitive Program Announcements and Application Kit. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
Whitworth, J. M.
, Lanier, M. W., & Haase, C. C. (1988). The influence of child protection teams on the development of community resources. In D. C. Bross, R. Krugman, M. Lenherr, D. Rosenberg, & B. Schmitt (Eds.), The new child protection team handbook (pp. 548-567). New York: Garland.
39.
Younges, L. A.
, & Besharov, D. J. (1988). State child abuse and neglect laws: A comparative analysis. In D. J. Besharow (Ed.), Protecting children from abuse and neglect (pp. 450-452). Spring-field, IL: Charles C Thomas.
