Parents with intellectual disabilities are disproportionately represented within child welfare systems in the US. Meanwhile, there is evidence to suggest that this is a sizeable population, and child welfare systems encounter challenges in meeting families’ needs. This study examines the potential efficacy of Project IMPACT, an intensive, in-home parent training program designed for parents with intellectual disabilities who have child welfare involvement. The aim of the program is to prevent family separation by improving parenting skills. The sample included 134 families who had participated in Project IMPACT and 355 families from a neighboring state who also had child welfare involvement. All families included a parent with intellectual disabilities. Treatment effects analysis was used to compare parents participating in Project IMPACT with a similar group of untreated parents. Logistic regression was used to identify between-group differences in family separation. Post-hoc analysis explored which families might benefit most from Project IMPACT. Project IMPACT families were 486% more likely to remain intact one year after program completion than untreated families. Effects were strongest for families with the youngest children. Child welfare systems should prioritize the implementation of evidence-informed interventions that tailor services to parents’ distinct needs and learning styles. By providing effective preventive interventions, programs such as Project IMPACT can focus on keeping children safe at home while preventing family separation.
AlC. M. W.StamsG. J. J. M.BekM. S.DamenE. M.AsscherJ. J.Van Der LaanP. H. (2012). A meta-analysis of intensive family preservation programs: Placement prevention and improvement of family functioning. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(8), 1472–1479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.04.002
2.
AugsbergerA.ZeitlinW.RaoT.WeisbergD.ToraifN. (2021). Examining a child welfare parenting intervention for parents with intellectual disabilities. Research on Social Work Practice, 31(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731520958489
3.
AunosM.PachecoL. (2020). Able or unable: How do professionals determine the parenting capacity of mothers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1729923
4.
AzarS. T.MaggiM. C.ProctorS. N. (2013). Practices changes in the child protection system to address the needs of parents with cognitive disabilities. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(5), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2013.857630
5.
BarthR. P.GuoS.McCraeJ. S. (2008). Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating the success of child and family service programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507307791
6.
BertramJ. E.Boyle‐DukeB. (2021). Children in out‐of‐home placement. In YearwoodE. L.PearsonG. S.NewlandJ. A. (Eds.), Child and adolescent behavioral health (1st ed., pp. 444–457). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119487593.ch25
7.
BoothT.BoothW. (2004). Findings from a court study of care proceedings involving parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 1(3), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2004.04032.x
8.
CEBC Overview. (2021). The California evidence-based clearinghouse for child welfare. https://www.cebc4cw.org/
9.
CollingsS.GraceR.LlewellynG. (2017). The role of formal support in the lives of children of mothers with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, 30(3), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12361
10.
DeZelarS.LightfootE. (2018). Use of parental disability as a removal reason for children in foster care in the US. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.01.027
11.
DeZelarS.LightfootE. (2020). Who refers parents with intellectual disabilities to the child welfare system? An analysis of referral sources and substantiation. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, Article 105639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105639
FeldmanM.McConnellD.AunosM. (2012). Parental cognitive impairment, mental health, and child outcomes in a child protection population. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 5(1), 66–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2011.587632
14.
FeldmanM. A. (2002). Parents with intellectual disabilities and their children: Impediments and supports. In GriffithsD.FederoffP. (Eds.), Ethical dilemmas: Sexuality and developmental disability (pp. 255–292). NADD Press.
15.
FeldmanM. A.AunosM. (2020). Recent trends and future directions in research regarding parents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 7(3), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-020-00204-y
16.
FeldmanM. A.CapponA.CorbierK.CaruanaV.LarondeM.ThomsonK. (2025). Preliminary evaluation of the step-by-step parenting program for expectant parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, 38(2), Article e70034. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.70034
17.
FeldmanM. A.CaseL. (1993). Step-by-step child-care: A pictorial manual for parents, child-care workers, and babysitters. Authors.
18.
FeldmanM. A.CaseL. (1997). The effectiveness of audiovisual self-instructional materials in teaching child-care skills to parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7(2), 235–257.
19.
FeldmanM. A.CaseL. (1999). Teaching child-care and safety skills to parents with intellectual disabilities through self-learning. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 24(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668259900033861
20.
FeldmanM. A.CaseL.SparksB. (1992). Effectiveness of a child-care training program for parents at-risk for child neglect. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 24(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078698
21.
FeldmanM. A.DucharmeJ. M.CaseL. (1999). Using self-instructional pictorial manuals to teach child-care skills to mothers with intellectual disabilities. Behavior Modification, 23(3), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445599233007
22.
FeldmanM. A.GarrickM.CaseL. (1997). The effects of parent training on weight gain nonorganic-failure-to-thrive children of parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 5(1), 47–61.
23.
FeldmanM. A.SparksB.CaseL. (1993). Effectiveness of home-based early intervention on the language development of children of mothers with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14(5), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(93)90010-h
24.
FeldmanM. A.TahirM. (2016). Skills training for parents with intellectual disabilities. In SinghN. N. (Ed.), Handbook of evidence-based practices in intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 615–631). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26583-4_23
25.
GarciaC. (2019). Replacing foster care with family care: The family first prevention services Act of 2018. Family Law Quarterly, 53, 27.
26.
GuoS.BarthR. P.GibbonsC. (2006). Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating substance abuse services for child welfare clients. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.04.012
27.
GuoS.FraserM. W. (2014). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (2nd ed.). Sage publications.
28.
HodesM. W.MeppelderM.de MoorM.KefS.SchuengelC. (2018). Effects of video-feedback intervention on harmonious parent–child interaction and sensitive discipline of parents with intellectual disabilities: A randomized controlled trial. Child: care, health and development, 44(2), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12506
Huntington-KleinN. (2022). The effect: An introduction to research design and causality. CRC Press.
31.
IASSID Special Interest Research Group on Parents and Parenting with Intellectual Disabilities. (2008). Parents labelled with intellectual disability: Position of the IASSID SIRG on parents and parenting with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21(4), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00435.x
LaLiberteT. L. (2013). Are we prepared? Child welfare work with parents with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(5), 633–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2013.861382
34.
LightfootE.DeZelarS. (2016). The experiences and outcomes of children in foster care who were removed because of a parental disability. Children and Youth Services Review, 62, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.029
35.
LlewellynG.McConnellD.FerronatoL. (2003a). Prevalence and outcomes for parents with disabilities and their children in an Australian court sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00004-8
36.
LlewellynG.McConnellD.HoneyA.MayesR.RussoD. (2003b). Promoting health and home safety for children of parents with intellectual disability: A randomized controlled trial. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24(6), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2003.06.001
37.
McConnellD.AunosM.PachecoL.FeldmanM. (2020). Child maltreatment investigations in Canada: Main and moderating effects of primary caregiver cognitive impairment. Child Maltreatment, 26, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559520910806
38.
McConnellD.LlewellynG. (2002). Stereotypes, parents with intellectual disability and child protection. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 3, 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649060210161294
39.
McDanielB.DillenburgerK. (2007). Can childhood neglect be assessed and prevented through childcare skills training?Child Abuse Review, 16(2), 120–129.
40.
National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect. (2021b). In National child abuse and neglect data system (NCANDS) child file FFY 2019: User’s guide. Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research. Cornell University.
National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect. (2021a). In National child abuse and neglect data system (NCANDS) child file FFY 2019: Codebook. Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research. Cornell University.
43.
NielsonW.RomanT.Ecotone Analytics GBC. (2019). The unseen costs of foster care: A social return on investment study. Alia Innovations.
44.
OlivierJ.MayW. L.BellM. L. (2017). Relative effect sizes for measures of risk. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 46(14), 6774–6781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2015.1134575
45.
PowellR. (2023). Legal ableism: A systematic review of state termination of parental rights laws. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378408
46.
PowellR.AlbertS. (2020). Barriers and Facilitators to Compliance with the Americans with disabilities Act by the child welfare system: Insights from Interviews with disabled parents, child welfare workers, and attorneys (SSRN scholarly Paper ID 3679229). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3679229
47.
PowellR. M.ParishS. L.AkobirshoevI. (2017). The health and economic well-being of US mothers with intellectual impairments. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, 30(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12308
48.
PowellR. M.ParishS. L.MitraM.WaterstoneM.FournierS. (2022). Child welfare system inequities experienced by disabled parents: Towards a conceptual framework. Disability & Society, 39(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2071675
49.
RaoT. (2013). Implementation of an intensive, home-based program for parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(5), 691–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2013.857628
50.
RothbardA. (2015). Quality issues in the use of administrative data records. In FantuzzoJ.CulhaneD. P. (Eds.), Actionable intelligence: Using integrated data systems to achieve a more effective, efficient, and ethical government (pp. 77–103). Palgrave Macmillan.
51.
SchweitzerD. D.PecoraP. J.NelsonK.WaltersB.BlytheB. J. (2015). Building the evidence base for intensive family preservation services. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 9(5), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2015.1090363
52.
SimonJ. D.D’AndradeA.HsuH.-T. (2021). The intersection of child welfare services and public assistance: An analysis of dual-system involvement and successful family preservation completion on a maltreatment re-report. Children and Youth Services Review, 127, Article 106075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106075
53.
TarletonB.WardL. (2007). “Parenting with support”: The views and experiences of parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00118.x
The California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (2024). Skills Assessment for Parents with Intellectual Disability (SAPID). Measurement Tools. http://www.cebc4cw.org/assessment-tool/sapid/.
TymchukA. J. (1999). Moving towards integration of services for parents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 24(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668259900033881
59.
TymchukA. J.GroenA.DolyniukC. A. (2000). Health, safety, and well-being reading recognition abilities of young parents with functional disabilities: Construction and preliminary validation of a prescriptive assessment instrument. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 12(4), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009484114146
60.
TymchukA. J.LangC. M.SewardsS. E.LiebermanS.KooS. (2003). Developmental and validation of the illustrated version of the home inventory for dangers and safety precautions: Continuing to address learning needs of parents in injury prevention. Journal of Family Violence, 18(4), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024020431801
61.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2023a). Child maltreatment 2021. Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau.
62.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2023b). Discrimination on the basis of disability in health and human service programs or activities (HHS-OCR-2023-0013-0001). Federal Register, 88(177), 63392–63512.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2025). Child maltreatment 2023. Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cb/cm2023.pdf
65.
WaltermaurerE. (2018). Westchester Institute for Human Development: Social return on investment & economic impact study. SUNY New Paltz.
66.
WardL. (2010). Supporting parents, supporting families: Changing approaches to parents with intellectual disability. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 4(2), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.5042/amhid.2010.0319
WhiteB. R. (2015). Termination of parental rights of mentally disabled parents in New York: Suggestions for fixing an overbroad, outdated statute. Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal, 34, 1–42. https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj/vol34/iss1/1
69.
WilsonS.McKenzieK.QuayleE.MurrayG. (2014). A systematic review of interventions to promote social support and parenting skills in parents with an intellectual disability. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12023
ZeitlinW.AugsbergerA. (2024). Mothers in the community: Intellectual functioning and child welfare involvement. Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development, 21(2), 193–210. DOI:10.1080/26904586.2023.2259382
72.
ZeitlinW.AugsbergerA. (2024). Mothers in the community: Intellectual functioning and child welfare involvement. Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development, 21(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/26904586.2023.2259382
73.
ZeitlinW.AugsbergerA.RaoT. (2024). Do intensive specialized services prevent family separation in parents with intellectual disabilities? A treatment effects analysis. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2024.2382261
74.
ZeitlinW.AugsbergerA.RaoT. (2025) (In press). Do intensive specialized services prevent family separation in parents with intellectual disabilities? A treatment effects analysis. Journal of Public Child Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2024.2382261
75.
ZeitlinW.AugsbergerA.RaoT.WeisbergD.ToraifN. (2021). Measuring parenting skills: Validating the Skills Assessment for Parents with Intellectual Disability. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 18(2), 235–248.
76.
ZeitlinW.AugsbergerA.RaoT.WeisbergD.ToraifN. (2021). Measuring parenting skills: Validating the skills assessment for parents with intellectual disability. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 18(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2020.1830909
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
