Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-8
Relations Between Psychological Maltreatment by Teachers and Cyberbullying Perpetration Among Elementary School Students: The Roles of Self-Esteem and Sex
The topics of psychological maltreatment by teachers and children’s cyberbullying perpetration have both attracted increasing research attention. However, clarification of the development and specific psychological mechanisms linking psychological maltreatment by teachers to cyberbullying perpetration by students remains necessary. Thus, this study examined the longitudinal relations between psychological maltreatment by teachers and subsequent cyberbullying perpetration, along with the mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of sex. A total of 5563 Chinese elementary school students (56% boys; Mage = 9.92 years, SD = 0.74) completed self-report measures on 5 occasions across 2.5 years. Latent growth curve mediation modeling was applied to examine the longitudinal relations among the variables. Results showed that (a) Psychological maltreatment by teachers was positively associated with subsequent cyberbullying perpetration; (b) The developmental trajectory of psychological maltreatment by teachers was indirectly associated with the developmental trajectory of cyberbullying perpetration through the mediating role of self-esteem; (c) Sex moderated the relations among psychological maltreatment by teachers, self-esteem and cyberbullying perpetration among children such that self-esteem mediated the relation between psychological maltreatment by teachers and cyberbullying perpetration for boys but not girls. Implications for the prevention of psychological maltreatment by teachers and cyberbullying perpetration were discussed.
AbeeleM. V.CockR. (2013). Cyberbullying by mobile phone among adolescents: The role of gender and peer group status. Communications, 38(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0006
AluedeO.OjugoA. I.OkozaJ. (2012). Emotional abuse of secondary school students by teachers in Edo state, Nigeria. Research in Education, 88(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.88.1.3
4.
ArslanS.SavaserS.HallettV.BalciS. (2012). Cyberbullying among primary school students in Turkey: Self-reported prevalence and associations with home and school life. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0207
5.
BalakrishnanV. (2015). Cyberbullying among young adults in Malaysia: The roles of gender, age and Internet frequency. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.021
BaumeisterR. F. (1997). Esteem threat, self-regulatory breakdown, and emotional distress as factors in self-defeating behavior. Review of General Psychology, 1(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.145
8.
BenbenishtyR.ZeiraA.AstorR. A.Khoury-KassabriM. (2002). Maltreatment of primary school students by educational staff in Israel. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(12), 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00416-7
9.
BerneS.FrisénA.Schultze-KrumbholzA.ScheithauerH.NaruskovK.LuikP.KatzerC.ErentaiteR.ZukauskieneR. (2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.022
10.
BlaneyJ. M.FeldonD. F.LitsonK. (2022). Student and advisor gender identity in STEM doctoral programs: Examining longitudinal and mediating effects with latent growth models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(8), 1416–1446. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21761
11.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equation models with latent variables. Wiley.
12.
BonannoR. A.HymelS. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1
CameriniA. L.MarcianoL.CarraraA.SchulzP. J. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics and Informatics, 49, Article 101362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101362
15.
CauffmanE.SteinbergL. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18(6), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.416
16.
ChenJ.ZhouJ.HuebnerE. S.TianL. (2022). Co-development of aggression in elementary school children: The predictive roles of victimization experiences. Aggressive Behavior, 48(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22011
17.
ChenJ. K.WeiH. S. (2011). Student victimization by teachers in Taiwan: Prevalence and associations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(5), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.009
18.
ChenQ.ZhuY. (2023). Experiences of childhood trauma and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 33(1), 50–63. https://10.1080/02185385.2022.2077816
19.
CheongJ.MacKinnonD. P.KhooS. T. (2003). Investigation of mediational processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(2), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1002_5
20.
DengC.GongX.LiuW.HuebnerE. S.TianL. (2022). Co-developmental trajectories of interpersonal relationships in middle childhood to early adolescence: Associations with traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(9), 2701–2723. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221087618
21.
DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.MoffittT. E.CaspiA. (2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science, 16(4), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01535.x
22.
DoumenS.BuyseE.ColpinH.VerschuerenK. (2011). Teacher-child conflict and aggressive behaviour in first grade: The intervening role of children’s self-esteem. Infant and Child Development, 20(6), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.725
23.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences. In The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies (pp. 1–3). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183
24.
EllisP. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.
25.
EvangelioC.Rodríguez-GonzálezP.Fernández-RíoJ.Gonzalez-VilloraS. (2022). Cyberbullying in elementary and middle school students: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 176(1), Article 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104356
26.
FergusonC. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
27.
FromuthM. E.DavisT. L.KellyD. B.WakefieldC. (2015). Descriptive features of student psychological maltreatment by teachers. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 8(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-015-0042-3
28.
GaoJ.LiuF.XuJ.WangJ.MouJ.WangL. (2022). The influence of family incivility on cyberbullying perpetration: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 975335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.975335
29.
GongX.HuebnerE. S.TianL. (2022). Longitudinal relations between child maltreatment in families and psychological maltreatment by teachers: The mediating roles of internalizing and externalizing problems among Chinese children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(3-4), 2716–2741. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221104524
30.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
31.
JinT.WuY.ZhangL.LiX.LiuZ. (2020). Childhood psychological maltreatment and cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents: The moderating roles of perceived social support and gender. Journal of Psychological Science, 43(2), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200210
32.
KimD.LiuQ.QuartanaP. J.YoonK. L. (2022). Gender differences in aggression: A multiplicative function of outward anger expression. Aggressive Behavior, 48(4), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22028
LearyM. R.TamborE. S.TerdalS. K.DownsD. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518
35.
LeeD. Y.HarringJ. R.StapletonL. M. (2019). Comparing methods for addressing missingness in longitudinal modeling of panel data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1520683
36.
LeiH.MaoW.CheongC. M.WenY.CuiY.CaiZ. (2020). The relationship between self-esteem and cyberbullying: A meta-analysis of children and youth students. Current Psychology, 39(3), 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00407-6
37.
LiW.ZengX.WangY.CurtisR.SparksE. (2021). Does school matter for students’ self-esteem? Associations of family SES, peer SES, and school resources with Chinese students’ self-esteem. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 71(6), Article 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100565
38.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
39.
LizutJ. (2019). Cyberbullying at school: Prevention and intervention strategies. In KeengweJ. (Ed.), Cyberbullying and the critical importance of educational resources for prevention and intervention (pp. 267–292). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8076-8.ch009
40.
LongobardiC.SettanniM.PrinoL. E.GastaldiF. G. M. (2018). Emotionally abusive behavior in Italian middle school teachers as identified by students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(8), 1327–1347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515615144
41.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
MooreP. M.HuebnerE. S.HillsK. J. (2012). Electronic bullying and victimization and life satisfaction in middle school students. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9856-z
NearchouF. (2018). Resilience following emotional abuse by teachers: Insights from a cross-sectional study with Greek students. Child Abuse & Neglect, 78, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.012
46.
NiY.HeskethT. (2021). Childhood maltreatment: Experiences and perceptions among Chinese young people. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23-24), 11385–11408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519898446
47.
NieR.ZhouN.ZhangY.FangX. (2017). Associations among interpersonal relationships and high students’ internalizing and externalizing problems: The mediating roles of self-esteem and gender differences. Psychological Development and Education, 33(6), 708–718. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.06.09
48.
PabianS.VandeboschH. (2016). Short-term longitudinal relationships between adolescents’ (cyber)bullying perpetration and bonding to school and teachers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415573639
49.
PalermitiA. L.BartoloM. G.MussoP.ServidioR.CostabileA. (2022). Self-esteem and adolescent bullying/cyberbullying and victimization/cybervictimization behaviours: A person-oriented approach. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.5379
50.
PaniaguaC.García-MoyaI.Sánchez-QueijaI.MorenoC. (2022). Bullying, cyberbullying, and adoption: What is the role of student-teacher connectedness?School Psychologist, 37(5), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000508
51.
PeterI. K.PetermannF. (2018). Cyberbullying: A concept analysis of defining attributes and additional influencing factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.013
52.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
53.
RezaM. H.BromfieldN. F.SultanaS.KhanM. M. R. (2020). Child maltreatment in Bangladesh: Poverty, social class, and the emotional abuse of elementary school children by teachers. Children and Youth Services Review, 116(2), Article 105195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105195
54.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
55.
ScharpfF.KızıltepeR.KirikaA.HeckerT. (2023). A systematic review of the prevalence and correlates of emotional violence by teachers. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 2581–2597. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221102559
56.
SmithP. K.MahdaviJ.CarvalhoM.FisherS.RussellS.TippettN. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
57.
SuW.HanX.YuH.WuY.PotenzaM. N. (2020). Do men become addicted to internet gaming and women to social media? A meta-analysis examining gender-related differences in specific internet addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 113(1), Article 106480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106480
58.
SunS.FanX.DuJ. (2016). Cyberbullying perpetration: A meta-analysis of gender differences. International Journal of Internet Science, 11(1), 61–81.
VogelR. M.MitchellM. S. (2017). The motivational effects of diminished self-esteem for employees who experience abusive supervision. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2218–2251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314566462
61.
von SoestT.HagtvetK. A. (2011). Mediation analysis in a latent growth curve modeling framework. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(2), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.557344
62.
WangM.HuebnerE. S.LiuY.TianL. (2022). Longitudinal relations between traditional bullying victimization and cyberbullying perpetration in elementary school students: Deviant peer affiliation as a mediator. Psychology of Violence, 12(5), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000433
63.
WangX.HuebnerE. S.TianL. (2023). Longitudinal relations among perceived parental warmth, self‐esteem and social behaviours from middle childhood to early adolescence in China: Disentangling between- and within-person associations. British Journal of Psychology, 114(4), 969–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12672
64.
WeiB. (2015). Classroom perspective: Study on primary and secondary school teachers’ criticism behavior and its influence to teacher-student relationship and students’ self-esteem(Unpublished master’s thesis). Soochow University.
65.
WeiR. (2007). Effects of playing violent videogames on Chinese adolescents’ pro-violence attitudes, attitudes toward others, and aggressive behavior. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10(3), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9942
66.
XiangX. (2009). A study on schoolchildren psychological abuse and the abused schoolchildren’s mental health(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Central South University.
67.
XuW.ZhengS. (2022). Childhood emotional abuse and cyberbullying perpetration among Chinese university students: The chain mediating effects of self-esteem and problematic social media use. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), Article 1036128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036128
68.
YangJ.WangN.GaoL.WangX. (2021). Childhood maltreatment and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: The roles of self-esteem and friendship quality. Journal of Psychological Science, 44(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20210111
69.
ZychI.Ortega-RuizR.Marín-LópezI. (2016). Cyberbullying: A systematic review of research, its prevalence and assessment issues in Spanish studies. Psicología Educativa, 22(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.03.002
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
