Limited research describes approaches for applying a public health lens to fatal child maltreatment classification. Specialized terminology and tools could help improve consistency in classifying deaths resulting from caregiver behavior. A six-criterion classification tool was developed via expert panel review of over 100 child deaths by the Alaska Division of Public Health’s Child Death Review (CDR) program. Next, accuracy and acceptability were assessed by inviting staff from other CDRs using a national listserv to classify 21 brief case scenarios with the tool. Among the 47 respondents, sensitivity was 0.87, specificity 0.77, and accuracy 0.84. Variability by tool criterion ranged from 97% to 74% accurate. Most respondents (66%) reported the tool as being helpful for classifying deaths and moderate reliability was found. Study participants found it difficult to consistently apply specific criteria which resulted in a modification of the tool to improve the potential for universal adoption.
BoddyC. (2012). The nominal group Technique: An aid to brainstorming ideas in research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751211191964
3.
Commission to Eliminate Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities. (2016). Within our reach: A national strategy to eliminate child abuse and neglect strategies. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/resource/cecanf-final-report
4.
CovingtonT. (2013). The public health approach for understanding and preventing child maltreatment. Child Welfare, 92(2), 21–40.
5.
CovingtonT. M. (2011). The US national child death review case reporting system. Injury Prevention, 17(Suppl I), i34. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2010.031203
6.
FortsonB. L.KlevensJ.MerrickM. T.GilbertL. K.AlexanderS. P. (2016a). Preventing child abuse and neglect: A technical package for policy, norm, and programmatic activities. In National center for injury prevention and Control (U.S.). Division of violence prevention. Retrieved from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/38864
7.
FortsonB. L.KlevensJ.MerrickM. T.GilbertL. K.AlexanderS. P. (2016b). Preventing child abuse and neglect: A technical package for policy, norm, and programmatic activities (cdc:38864). Retrieved from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/38864
8.
JennissenC. A.EvansE.OralR.DenningG. (2018). Child abuse and neglect experts’ determination of when a child being left home alone constitutes child neglect. Injury Epidemiology, 5(Suppl 1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-018-0144-0
9.
MantellD. M.ChongN.TakenoT.PazdurM.WalkerT. (2024). Child fatality individual case reports: A 24‐year national state‐by‐state review. Child Abuse Review, 33(1), Article e2855.
10.
MorrongielloB. A.CorbettM.McCourtM.JohnstonN. (2006). Understanding unintentional injury risk in young children II. The Contribution of caregiver supervision, child attributes, and parent attributes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31(6), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsj073
11.
Office of the Surgeon General (US). (2005). Surgeon general’s workshop on making prevention of child maltreatment a national priority: Implementing innovations of a public health approach. Lister Hill Auditorium, National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK47486/
12.
OverpeckM. D.BrennerR. A.TrumbleA. C.TrifilettiL. B.BerendesH. W. (1998). Risk factors for infant homicide in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(17), 1211–1216. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199810223391706
13.
PalusciV. J.WirtzS. J.CovingtonT. M. (2010). Using capture-recapture methods to better ascertain the incidence of fatal child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(6), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.11.002
14.
ParrishJ. W.SchnitzerP. G.LanierP.ShanahanM. E.DanielsJ. L.MarshallS. W. (2017). Classification of maltreatment-related mortality by Child Death Review teams: How reliable are they?Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.03.003
15.
PaulozziL. J.MercyJ.FrazierL.Jr.AnnestJ. L.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). CDC's national violent death reporting system: Background and methodology. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 10(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2003.003434
16.
PetersonL.EwigmanB.KivlahanC. (1993). Judgments regarding appropriate child supervision to prevent injury: The role of environmental risk and child age. Child Development, 64(3), 934–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02953.x
17.
QuintonR. A. (2017). Child death review: Past, present, and future. Academic Forensic Pathology, 7(4), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.23907/2017.045
18.
RebeccaT. L.LeonardJ. P.MelansonC.SimonT. R.AriasI. (2008). Child maltreatment surveillance: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Retrieved from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/cm_surveillance-a.pdf
19.
Richmond-CrumM.JoynerC.FogertyS.EllisM. L.SaulJ. (2013). Applying a public health approach: The role of state health departments in preventing maltreatment and fatalities of children. Child Welfare, 92(2), 99–117.
20.
SchnitzerP. G.CovingtonT. M.KruseR. L. (2011). Assessment of caregiver responsibility in unintentional child injury deaths: Challenges for injury prevention. Injury Prevention, 17(Suppl I), i45. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2010.027094
21.
SchnitzerP. G.CovingtonT. M.WirtzS. J.Verhoek-OftedahlW.PalusciV. J. (2008). Public health surveillance of fatal child maltreatment: Analysis of 3 state programs. American Journal of Public Health, 98(2), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.087783
22.
SchnitzerP. G.DowdM. D.KruseR. L.MorrongielloB. A. (2015). Supervision and risk of unintentional injury in young children. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 21(e1), e63–e70. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041128
23.
SchnitzerP. G.GulinoS. P.YuanY.-Y. T. (2013). Advancing public health surveillance to estimate child maltreatment fatalities. Child Welfare, 92(2), 77–98.
24.
TurszA.CrostM.Gerbouin-RérolleP.CookJ. M. (2010). Underascertainment of child abuse fatalities in France: Retrospective analysis of judicial data to assess underreporting of infant homicides in mortality statistics. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(7), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.12.005
25.
United States Government Accountability Office. (2011). Report to the chairman, committee on ways and Means, House of Representatives. (2011, july 12). In Child Maltreatment: Strengthening National Data on Child Fatalities Could Aid in Prevention. Retrieved from: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-11-599
26.
US. (2020). Department of health & human services, administration for children and families, administration on children, youth and families, children’s bureau. Child Maltreatment. Retrieved from: https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/data-research/child-maltreatment
27.
WolfL. L.ChowdhuryR.TweedJ.VinsonL.LosinaE.HaiderA. H.QureshiF. G. (2017). State-level geographic variation in prompt access to care for children after motor vehicle crashes. Journal of Surgical Research, 217(1), 75–83.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
